NP Rank:
GM: We'll Lose Our Shirts on the Volt, But That's OK
The Chevrolet Volt might just prove to be the game-changing car its supporters say it is, but General Motors expects to lose money on the car "for years," said Vice Chairman Bob Lutz.
Maximum Bob's frank admission isn't terribly surprising given the resources GM is pouring into the Volt and the expense of the technology behind the range-extended EV, but you've got to admire his honesty.
"We won't make a dime on this car for years, and the board is OK with that," he told a group of Volt enthusiasts at the New York International Auto Show, according to the Detroit News.
As for the car itself, Lutz says it's still on pace for a late 2010 launch. Battery testing is going well, he said during a meeting with reporters, and the competition to supply the batteries is "a horse race" that will run "a little longer."
And why is GM prepared to lose its shirt?
Lutz said GM screwed up by ceding the hybrid market to Toyota even though it had largely mastered EV technology in the 1960s. The General won't make that mistake again, he said, even if it means subsidizing the Volt until it's firmly established. That's a noteworthy about-face, because according to Lutz, GM dropped the ball on hybrids because it believed it would lose $250 million a year selling them. Toyota, on the other hand, decided that short-term losses on the Prius would pay huge dividends once it caught on.
GM clearly hopes the same strategy will work with the Volt and put the company at the forefront of automotive technology. There's no question GM hopes to leapfrog Toyota and claim the green mantle -- a point Lutz stressed in an interview with Wired.com not long ago.
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
-
Khaz
Edison, New Jersey, United States -
ryan
Vancouver, Canada -
scofire
Lubbock, Texas, United States -
JeniJen737
Miami, Florida, United States -
electrofreeze
San Francisco, California, United States -
tuffdante
Canada -
V Taitano
San Jose, California, United States -
e2of4
Grand Blanc, Michigan, United States -
mikepj
Mount Pleasant, Michigan, United States -
vicbel
Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States -
mmforan1
Lansing, Michigan, United States -
J_duber
Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States -
david.stingray
Leesburg, Virginia, United States -
Durwoood
Toledo, Ohio, United States -
ford302_91
Falls Church, Virginia, United States -
patrick_r
Germantown, Maryland, United States -
Kinmar
Bloomington, Indiana, United States -
brightvette09
Frankenmuth, Michigan, United States -
c.a.muller
Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States -
joeolas
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States -
uttarabodhi
San Francisco, California, United States -
ripismoney
Flint, MI, Michigan, United States -
elecrzy
Milpitas, California, United States
















Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (8)
at 16:35 on March 20th, 2008
The Volt and the E-Flex system are huge keystones for the future of GM. Though the car may not appear as sleek or affordable in the production version, the Volt is a car I have been looking forward to ever since the concept first arrived.
at 18:23 on March 20th, 2008
I have a feeling this is going to be another smokescreen. They've already started with the excuses. I will not be looking to GM to lead the electric car revolution. That's for sure.
vicbel has contributed a photo to this story.
at 18:04 on March 20th, 2008
Hey guys: don't forget that Toyota was losing about $20k on each Prius they sold for (Sorry, I don't remember how long ago that was - it took a while, though.)
They have all kinds of reports on the consequences of using different technologies in different places - like some kinds of paint don't work in Canada but they work fine in Mexico because of the weather differences. The problem is that they have no such reports for the new technology that they introduce. They need to pour the money into it, pay to repair and replace whatever gets sent back, pay the law suits associated with big mistakes, etc.
They still make the same kinds of investments in gas cars - but they don't lose money on those investments because they have a better idea of how things will turn out.
Incidentally: Fire departments reported that they, too, were forced into new situations when they responded to the first electric car and truck emergencies. The fire crews were not trained to deal with the power issues - not just the electricity from the batteries but also the acid, the weight, etc.
It's a bridge we're all going to have to cross; it seems we're moving along.
--Sam.
at 21:06 on March 20th, 2008
Thanks for the great perspective on this issue.
Obviously, when a totally new product is launched it takes some time to re-coop the initial development costs but those are one time costs and the rest is pure profit...hopefully at least.
at 18:32 on March 20th, 2008
Afraid of losing $230M a year? Don't they hope to just lose $230M these days?
at 20:38 on March 20th, 2008
Chevy Volt Concept. It's almost all electric!
elecrzy has contributed a photo to this story.
at 07:12 on March 21st, 2008
Plug it into 120V outlet! The classic lines of this car really drew a crowd at the 2008 Detroit Auto Show.
e2of4 has contributed a photo to this story.
at 06:56 on March 22nd, 2008
We were visiting California for the first time and this ad really caught our eye. It's cropped out of the photo, but it has "an electric cord" plugged into an oversized outlet.
JeniJen737 has contributed a photo to this story.