It Is Time To Dump John Boehner As House Leader

by Edmund Jenks | December 23, 2011 at 11:23 am
129 views | 0 Recommendations | 3 comments

Photos

It Is Time To Dump John Boehner As House Leader

It Is Time To Dump John Boehner As House Leader

see larger image

uploaded by Edmund Jenks

Congressman Boehner caves to the unfactual positions and political tactics of the Senate Democrats led by the 44th President of the United States. Image Credit: johnboehner.house.gov

It Is Time To Dump John Boehner As House Leader

John Boehner is the worst leader of the Republican party in the House of Representatives in over sixty years (maybe longer). The latest evidence of this horrible level of leadership is shown on how he continues to have trouble closing the door on original arguments made and legislation passed when the opposition is able to out-and-out lie and get away with it.

Facts are facts, and lies are lies ... it is time that the American people have a leader of the Republican party in the House of Representatives that knows how to communicate the difference and stand for the truth.

This excerpted and edited from The White House - Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President on the Payroll Tax Cut

South Court Auditorium - December 22, 2011, 1:00 P.M. EST

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you, everybody. (Applause.) Please have a seat. Good afternoon to all of you. Merry Christmas. Happy holidays
----
Now, on Saturday, we reached a bipartisan compromise that would do just that — make sure that people aren’t seeing a tax cut the first of the year; make sure that they still have unemployment insurance the first of the year. Nearly every Democrat in the Senate voted for that compromise. Nearly every Republican in the Senate voted for that compromise. Democrats and even some Republicans in the House voted for that compromise. I am ready to sign that compromise into law the second it lands on my desk.

So far, the only reason it hasn’t landed on my desk — the only reason — is because a faction of House Republicans have refused to support this compromise.
[this is because the Republicans and some Democrats in the House of Representatives passed an extension that was for one year and received back a bill to approve that was for only two months]

Now, if you’re a family making about $50,000 a year, this is a tax cut that amounts to about $1,000 a year [WRONG - the comprimise amounts to only 1/6th of this amount or about $160.00]. That’s about 40 bucks out of every paycheck [for two months as opposed to what the House of Representatives had approved ... 12 months]. It may be that there's some folks in the House who refuse to vote for this compromise because they don’t think that 40 bucks is a lot of money. But anyone who knows what it’s like to stretch a budget knows that at the end of the week, or the end of the month, $40 can make all the difference in the world [the President is arguing for a continued return of $160.00 as opposed to $1,000.00].

And that’s why we thought we’d bring your voices into this debate. So many of these debates in Washington end up being portrayed as which party is winning, which party is losing. But what we have to remind ourselves of is this is about people. This is about the American people and whether they win. It's not about a contest between politicians [NO - this is all about the President and Senate Democrats only wishing to extend the tax policy for two (2) months as opposed to all of the Republicans in the House passing a bill for one (1) full year].

So on Tuesday, we asked folks to tell us what would it be like to lose $40 out of your paycheck every week [the President and Senate Democrats for eight (8) weeks as opposed to House Republicans fifty-two (52) weeks]. And I have to tell you that the response has been overwhelming. We haven't seen anything like this before. Over 30,000 people have written in so far — as many as 2,000 every hour. We’re still hearing from folks — and I want to encourage everybody who's been paying attention to this to keep sending your stories to WhiteHouse.gov and share them on Twitter and share them on Facebook.

The responses we’ve gotten so far have come from Americans of all ages and Americans of all backgrounds, from every corner of the country. Some of the folks who responded are on stage with me here today, and they should remind every single member of Congress what’s at stake in this debate. Let me just give you a few samples.

Joseph from New Jersey talked about how he would have to sacrifice the occasional pizza night with his daughters. He said — and I'm quoting — “My 16-year-old twins will be out of the house soon. I'll miss this.”
[I thought that Michelle Obama and "My Plate" wanted the American people to eat healthier - no pizza | the President and Senate Democrats only wish Joseph and his family to have an occasional pizza night with his family two (2) months as opposed to all of the Republicans in the House passing a bill for a one (1) full year extension]

Richard from Rhode Island wrote to tell us that having an extra $40 in his check buys enough heating oil to keep his family warm for three nights. In his words — I'm quoting — “If someone doesn't think that 12 gallons of heating oil is important, I invite them to spend three nights in an unheated home. Or you can believe me when I say that it makes a difference.” [The President and Senate Democrats only wish Richard from Rhode Island to have fuel to heat his home for two (2) months as opposed to all of the Republicans in the House passing a bill for a one (1) full year extension]

Pete from Wisconsin told us about driving more than 200 miles each week to keep his father-in-law company in a nursing home — $40 out of his paycheck would mean he'd only be able to make three trips instead of four. [The President and Senate Democrats wish to allow Pete from Wisconsin to visit his father-in-law in a nursing home for two (2) months as opposed to all of the Republicans in the House passing a bill for a one (1) full year extension]

We heard from a teacher named Claire from here in D.C. who goes to the thrift store every week and uses her own money to buy pencils and books for her fourth grade class. Once in a while she splurges on science or art supplies. Losing $40, she says, would mean she couldn’t do that anymore. [The President and Senate Democrats wish to allow Teacher Claire from D.C. to visit the thrift store every week and use her own money to buy pencils and books for her fourth grade class for two (2) months as opposed to all of the Republicans in the House passing a bill for a one (1) full year extension]

For others, $40 means dinner out with a child who's home for Christmas, a new pair of shoes, a tank of gas, a charitable donation. These are the things at stake for millions of Americans. They matter to people. A lot. [NO - this is all about the President and Senate Democrats only wishing to extend the tax policy for two (2) months as opposed to all of the Republicans in the House passing a bill for one (1) full year]

And keep in mind that those are just the individual stories. That doesn’t account for the overall impact that a failure to extend the payroll tax cut and a failure to extend unemployment insurance would have on the economy as a whole. We've seen the economy do better over the last couple of months, but there's still a lot of sources of uncertainty out there — what's going on in Europe, what's going on around the world. And so this is insurance to make sure that our recovery continues. [NO - this is all about the President and Senate Democrats only wishing to extend the tax policy for two (2) months an maintaining UNCERTAINTY as opposed to all of the Republicans in the House passing a bill for one (1) full year thus eliminating UNCERTAINTY for 12 months]

So it's time for the House to listen to the voices who are up here, the voices all across the country, and reconsider. What’s happening right now is exactly why people just get so frustrated with Washington. This is it; this is exactly why people get so frustrated with Washington. This isn’t a typical Democratic-versus-Republican issue [NO - this is all about the President and Senate Democrats only wishing to extend the tax policy for two (2) months as opposed to all of the Republicans in the House passing a bill for one (1) full year]. This is an issue where an overwhelming number of people in both parties agree {to extend current tax policy for one full year as opposed to a minority of Democrats holding this issue hostage and have it be talked about in another two months}. How can we not get that done? I mean, has this place become so dysfunctional that even when people agree to things we can't do it? (Applause.) It doesn’t make any sense. [NO - this is all about the President and Senate Democrats only wishing to extend the tax policy for two (2) months as opposed to all of the Republicans in the House passing a bill for one (1) full year]

So, enough is enough. The people standing with me today can’t afford any more games. They can’t afford to lose $1,000 [another lie - two months is only $160.00 as opposed to the $1,000.00 for what the Republicans in the House of Representatives had passed] because of some ridiculous Washington standoff [by you, Barack Obama and the Senate Democrats]. The House needs to pass a short-term version of this compromise, and then we should negotiate an agreement as quickly as possible to extend the payroll tax cut and unemployment insurance for the rest of 2012 [NO - all of the Republicans in the House passed a bill for one (1) full year already]. It's the right thing to do for the economy, and it's, most importantly, the right thing to do for American families all across the country.

This is not just my view. Just a few hours ago, this is exactly what the Republican Leader of the Senate said we should do [NO - this is all about the President and Senate Democrats only wishing to extend the tax policy for two (2) months as opposed to all of the Republicans in the House passing a bill for one (1) full year - Senator Mitch McConnell needs to be dumped as well for he will not stand for the truth over lies]. Democrats agree with the Republican Leader of the Senate. We should go ahead and get this done. This should not be hard. We all agree it should happen [all Democrats and one Republican in the Senate]. I believe it's going to happen sooner or later. Why not make it sooner, rather than later? [EXACTLY - agree to the one full year extension NOW ... not later] Let’s give the American people — the people who sent us here — the kind of leadership they deserve.

Thank you, everybody. (Applause.)


END
1:08 P.M. EST
[Reference Here]

The fact of the matter is that we will hear the following on the Sunday news shows ... pre-taped for Christmas Sunday.

SNEAK PEEK - CBS News correspondent predictions for 2012, pre-taped for Christmas Day edition of "Face the Nation":

--Nancy Cordes, Congressional Correspondent: "I think a day of reckoning is coming between House Speaker John Boehner and his number two man, Eric Cantor, because they have been on opposites sides of almost every major fight this year."

--Bob Schieffer, Chief Washington Correspondent and "Face the Nation" anchor: "I think we'll see a wholesale turnover in the congress. I think we'll see more incumbents turned out of office, both Republicans and Democrats, than in any time since I've been in Washington, and that's been a long time." (41 years!)
(ht: Politico)


Again, facts are facts, and lies are lies ... it is time that the American people have a leader of the Republican party in the House of Representatives [an the United States Senate] that knows how to communicate the difference and stand for the facts.


<Article first seen as It Is Time To Dump John Boehner As House Leader at Technorati>

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
"thirty-aught-six"

I think it must be very difficult for Congressional Republicans to vouch for further tax breaks under the Obama regime when they were so vilified by Democrats and the liberal media for the Bush tax breaks when the economic recession[s] 2002-3 and 2007 hit hard. The banks were collapsing thanks to the Clinton repeal of Glass-Steagal, Chrysler and GM bankrupt, and Clinton's Fannie Mae housing and mortgage fiasco. The liberal mantra of "make the rich pay" must still be ringing in their ears. To now have the Democrats flip flop on raising taxes and finally supporting the business man, and the liberal media forgetting their assertion that a recession is no time to lower the taxes. Well, it must leave the Congressional Republicans a little confused as to where they should stand with a federal election just around the corner. Do they say they learned their lesson and fight further tax breaks or do they roll over and blame Obama when their constituents ask about an ever increasing national and fiscal debt load? Personally, I think the Congressional Republicans have done well under the circumstances. My only caveat is that they, the Congressional Republicans,  need to work harder at reducing the size and scope of the federal government. Blue Dog Democrats have gone the way of the Dodo. So there is no centrist voice in this Obama progressive left White House to stand up against Obama's big government agenda.

0
Edmund Jenks

Correct - there is NO such thing as a moderate Democrat but I still question ... why in the H E Double-Toothpicks did Mitch McConnell leave Boehner swinging? - and ... as the post suggests ... a more vigorous declaration of the facts in defense that the Republicans passed a one-year solution while the Democrat controlled Senate and the President changed this all to just two months.  
 
Further, if one was to CAVE ... do not cave the day before Christmas, cave in the week between Christmas and New Year's Eve. This is all just Bush era and Bush league tactics. It is time to get rid of all Bush era Republican leadership - McConnell, Boehner, and the folks who back them.

0
"thirty-aught-six"

I assume that the rift with in the Republican Party is based exactly on that. Though I don't know if I would characterize it as being "Bush era" holdouts. There isn't many of those left. I think it has more to do with the fact that those running for election Nov. 2012 are not in line with either McConnell or Boehner or even maybe Eric Cantor. RINO Romney sure ain't.

Eric cantor got so mad at the Democrats double speak he walked away from the super-committee on deficit reduction. Democrats made it damn clear they will not be doing anything that really curbs long term government spending. They have a lot of votes to buy from the illegals and minority vote and have promised larger government to the SEIU.

Seems to me there is a lot of Republican intra-party positioning from the experienced. Could be a shake up in the works. Have to see what happens with Newt and Rick Perry in the election lead up. There is a hell of a lot of new Republicans in this 112th Congress. Well over one hundred. And this has left a large hole in terms of experience and thus actual voices that carry weight. It's a shame that the old guard [what is left of them] have concentrated on the Nov. 2012 election instead of bringing the new crop into the game preparing them for the next four years... plus? If the young ones get re-elected.

Personally, I think the Republican Party as a whole will pay a price down the road for this neglect of not listening to the new voices and getting some of the more promising members in front of the media to speak about their concerns and their take on current events. Not that the liberal media wants to hear anything from a green Republican or an old one either, but it might give some of the Tea Party members an idea whether or not anyone is listening to them.

The Tea Party have spent quite a bit of capital getting this new group into government hoping for some tangible change and while the liberal media says that the Tea Party are Republicans that just isn't so. They can as promised switch to the first Democrat who promises to listen and act on their concerns. I thought that when Obama said that the OWS was like the Tea Party that he might reach out, but no. He barely gave the OWS a passing wave before disappearing behind the skirts of the SEIU. With out them Obama has no re-election.

I'm waiting to see what Newt Gingrich has up his sleeve for after the election. I don't see him going quietly into political obscurity.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from