NP Rank:
key packages to help home buyers and repossession families..
UPDATE; 03rd September 2008
After months of continuing gloom on the UK housing front with more repossessions, more banks losing money and buyers waiting for the Government to decide what to do with stamp duty.
The long-awaited housing package, announced by Communities Secretary Hazel Blears, aims to help first-time buyers, protect homeowners from repossession and provide more social housing. As well as the £175,000 threshold stamp duty holiday, there are four other measures.....
HOMEBUY DIRECT
• How it works: First-time buyers whose household income is under £60,000 are entitled to an equity loan for up to 30 per cent of the price of a new-build property. It will be interest free for five years but a fee may be payable at the end. Cofunded by Government and developer.
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
•How it works: Local authorities will apply for grants to build more social housing over the next 18 months
MORTGAGE RESCUE
• How it works: Option A - Shared Ownership. Housing association buys share of property if owner cannot meet mortgage payments.
Owner pays rent on this portion, but their total bill is lower. When property is sold, housing association receives its share
Option B - Shared Equity. Housing association lends cash to owner to help pay mortgage; homeowner pays this back at low interest rate
Option C - Sale and Rent Back. Housing association pays off entire mortgage and rents back the property at an affordable rate.
Homeowner is now permanent tenant
IMPROVED INCOME SUPPORT FOR MORTGAGE INTEREST
• How it works: From April 2009, the Government will pay the interest on a mortgage of up to £175,000, 13 weeks after a homeowner loses their job.
Currently the wait is 39 weeks. To get ISMI, a homeowner must be receiving one of three benefits - income support, Jobseeker's Allowance or pension credit and have less than £16,000 in savings.
UPDATE; 18 August 08
London councils want to offer home loans to repossessed families and families who have been refused a loan by commercial lenders. ...London councils and Alistair Darling now think there is a better solution than repossession ..
1st time buyers....
Alistair Darling wants local authorities to take on families who have been refused a loan by commercial lenders.
The measure could help first-time buyers who struggle to raise the big deposits demanded by banks and building societies.
Town hall chiefs in London are drawing up proposals to offer mortgages to thousands of families struggling to buy a home.
They are urging Chancellor Alistair Darling to relax borrowing rules so councils can offer loans to home buyers.
Local authority bosses in the capital are looking at a safety net scheme to avoid repossessions.
They would take over the mortgage, or part of it, of people falling into arrears and then rent back the property.
In London, the number of court orders rose by 12% to 4,052, according to non-seasonally adjusted data.
There were large increases at several county courts including Edmonton, 34% to 395, Kingston-upon-Thames, 22 per cent to 93, and Brentford, 20 per cent to 191. 'The level of growth of repossession orders suggests that we are on track for a repossession-crisis very similar to the early Nineties,' said Liberal Democrat Treasury spokesman Vince Cable.
Demand for rented accommodation in July grew by 76 per cent year-on-year, according to new data from estate agent Your Move.
HOUSE repossessions across the UK were up 48 PER CENT in the fast half of the year – the highest level for 12 years, figures showed today.
A total of 18,900 homes were taken back by lenders after their owners failed to keep up with mortgage repayments – the equivalent of 0.16 per cent of all mortgages, the Council of Mortgage Lenders said.
The CML forecasts that 45,000 homes will be repossessed by the end of the year as cash-strapped borrowers struggle to repay their mortgages.
The total number of households with mortgage arrears of three months or more was 155,600 at the end of the first half, up from 120,800 in the same period last year.
Adam Sampson, Shelter's chief executive, said: "With current fears that unemployment is set to grow, there is no doubt we are inching ever closer to the dark days of the last repossession crisis.
"We know that behind these figures are thousands of families facing sleepless nights worrying about how to make their next mortgage payment, and many thousands more will be waking up to the frightening reality of repossession.
"Government urgently needs to step in to prevent thousands more families from losing their homes and provide the significant financial support troubled homeowners need to keep a roof over their head."
Earlier this week, the Financial Service Authority said some lenders had been too quick to take action against struggling borrowers and called on them to treat repossession only as a last resort.
Coogan said lenders would work with the FSA to ensure borrowers were treated fairly. "No-one wants to see a household lose their home, and repossession typically leads to a loss for the lender as well.
"The focus of lenders' arrears management policies today is on seeking realistic alternatives that balance the interests of customer and lender.
Sue Edwards, head of consumer policy at Citizens Advice, said: 'We are continuing to see high numbers of people coming to see us with mortgage and secured loan arrears.
'Yet in too many cases, lenders are still not doing everything they can to help borrowers in trouble, piling on extra charges, not negotiating with borrowers to come to a workable solution over repayment arrangements and using court action as a first rather than a last resort.'
For families who lose their homes, the consequences are heart-breaking, with many parents saying they feel like complete failures.
The downturn, combined with slowing car sales and the biggest slump in high-street takings for 25 years, had raised hopes that the gurus on the Bank's Monetary Policy Committee might cut the cost of borrowing.
Their decision to freeze rates at five per cent was heavily influenced by the spiralling cost of living. Inflation is at a 16-year high of 3.8 per cent - almost twice the government's two per cent target - and widely expected to hit five per cent later this year.
But the Bank's decision sparked fierce criticism from union leaders and those with a vested interest in the property market.
Royal Bank of Scotland has reported losses of £692 million for the first half of 2008.
The group reported statutory pre-tax losses of £692 million for the six months to June 30 - which compares with profits of £5 billion the previous year. Underlying profit fell 3 per cent to £5.1 billion.
Management was seeing "some increased strains" particularly among small business clients, it added, but has been offset by reductions in losses among personal unsecured debts thanks to a "conservative approach" to this sector in recent years.
Caroline Flint, the housing minister, argued that people's experiences now were nowhere near as bad as those in the last recession in the early 1990s.
"In the 1990s the problems people faced were high unemployment and high interest rates," she said.
The fact of the matter is that too many people have paid for their houses at unreasonable prices. If people had stopped buying when the national average house price had risen to greater than four times the national average wage then no one would be now facing repossessions. People can blame the banks, high energy prices, or acts of god but at the end of it all we each have our own responsibility to spend within our means and not beyond them.Posted By :Nick Ashwell
Chancellor Alistair Darling is believed to be looking at a number of measures to restore confidence in the UK’s stalling property market, including reforming the payment of stamp duty.
Options include a stamp duty holiday for all buyers, scrapping the tax for first time buyers or allowing purchasers to defer the payment of stamp duty. The idea of tax-free savings accounts for first-time buyers has also been mooted.
Details of the chancellor’s plans will be presented to Gordon Brown at the end of August.
Whatever the government decides, Mark Wallace, campaign director at TaxPayeyers Alliance, believes urgent action is needed. “The government can’t hedge their bets and not follow through what they’ve started,” says Wallace. “After the u-turn on home information packs, the 10p tax rate and proposed fuel duty hike this autumn we’ve almost come to accept that the government will change its mind. Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling need to acknowledge the financial pain many families are suffering and do something meaningful about it.”








Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (13)
at 06:25 on August 8th, 2008
liamssoft, I like this story. It's good stuff.
I am not surprised unfortunately!
at 09:25 on August 8th, 2008
Many thanks for the GS and comments Pachen, The Government and Lenders seem unconcerned when they could be implementing financial help as they did with Northern Rock. Reduced payments to what the buyer can afford could be a solution or an extension to the Low-cost home ownership scheme to allow for home-owners under threat of repossession to repurchase their home on a shared ownership basis.
Doing nothing is not an option for a Government that wants to be re-elected.
at 06:58 on August 8th, 2008
liamssoft, I like this story. It's good stuff.
The news is just getting worse isn't it? terrible
at 07:17 on August 8th, 2008
So, this mortgage crisis is a global problem! Crooked and shaky financial dealings by banks, mortgage lenders and agents, and realtors have fostered this problem. Hope help comes for the victims, not the criminals.
at 07:44 on August 8th, 2008
Many thanks for your comments and GS amyjudd. It's hard to imagine what it must feel like to lose your home and see it being sold at auction for a fraction of the amount you paid for it. It does not end there because they still owe the Lender the outstanding amount even though the property in reality is now only worth the auction price.
at 07:37 on August 8th, 2008
Many thanks for your comments and GS René.
I agree the property market is to blame for the inflated prices and the banks for loaning on that basis. In May 2007 House Prices And People’s Incomes were 10 times average earnings. Fine if you have the cash but otherwise a risky business which bankers at least should have been aware of. All common sense seems to have flown out the window.
at 07:35 on August 8th, 2008
liamssoft, I like this story. It's an excellent summary of the issues. its really sad that we've all been sold the 'dream' of buying when, in the rest of Europe people rent much more widely. There has been far too much money devoted to house purchasing and not enough towards 'venture capital' which creates real wealth rather than this illusory amount!
at 08:33 on August 8th, 2008
liamssoft, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 09:44 on August 8th, 2008
Many thanks for your comments a GS Gerry. Yes I agree, and in many cases sold the dream of somewhere to live.
For low income groups it is difficult to find affordable accommodation. The higher housing prices have changed the social housing landscape forcing social housing into shared ownership, where the tenant/purchaser can more easily get a mortgage for their share, but pays for all the maintenance and running cost whilst paying rent and a mortgage. If the property is sold the housing association receives the market value share and the tenant/purchaser the remainder.
Its critics say it's only a plus if properties rise in value but in many cases they have fallen. But the scheme has housed thousands of people who might not have had the income to buy or rent on the open market.
With millions of council homes sold off since the 1970s the private landlord who has more incentives to invest in buy-to-let than pension schemes, which have largely failed in many cases, they have taken over much of the rental sector, taking away the Councils financial burden of building and maintaining social housing. Even with the boom-and-bust cycle people will always need somewhere to live.
at 09:27 on August 8th, 2008
Many thanks for your comments and GS Vinny.
at 05:12 on August 17th, 2008
Have any one got the FIX ? Lets look where this mess all started. Well is it the BANKER ? NO? Tell me this, when is the LAST time you herd of anyone walking into a BANK ECT: and tell them they wanted to BUY A HOME, and here are my terms, you can not ask what I make or if I have a JOB, and you are not going to look at my F I C O SCOOR, and I want to get the loan for more than the SELLING PRICE , because I will improve the VALUE w/the up grades, and as a GOOD BANKER , you made the loan in GOOD FAITH. AT a good intrest rate, for the BANK and SHAREHOLDERS, every body got a piece of the PIE. BIG BROTHER AT HIS BEST The Real Problem is NOT many people can see it.? What do you think of becomming a Third World Country? The HAVES an The HAVE NOTS DO you have a choice? NO look what is headed to the WHITE HOUSE, Bouth want to GIVE the COUNTRY AWAY, open the BORDERS, unlimited VISA to ant one, sell most big cos to any country, out source anything to any cheap labor market, give away our jobs, OH YEA what a wounderful world. What a BRIGHT FURTURE OUR CHILDREN HAVE.. GOOD LOOK AMERICA
at 05:18 on August 17th, 2008
Nothing will change, look what we have in CONGRESS and the House, there ALL in bed w/ BIG MONEY. GOOD LUCK AMERICA
at 16:34 on August 17th, 2008
Thanks arol Gober (not verified). I would say the mess started at or before 9/11.