Local Radio Freedom Act Gains Support

by CynicalPatriot | June 11, 2009 at 05:51 am
758 views | 4 Recommendations | 4 comments

WASHINGTON, DC -- The Local Radio Freedom Act, introduced in late October by Reps. Gene Green (D-TX) and Mike Conaway (R-TX), is now backed by 148 members of the House of Representatives.

"Congress should not impose any new performance fee, tax, royalty, or other charge relating to the public performance of sound recordings on a local radio station for broadcasting sound recordings over-the-air, or on any business for such public performance of sound recordings," reads House Concurrent Resolution 244.

The growing chorus of lawmakers opposing a "performance fee, tax, royalty, or other charge" on local radio was announced one day after the Grammy Awards, where Alicia Keys thanked radio stations during her acceptance speech for Best Female R&B Performance.

"I have to thank... every DJ, every radio guy, every promotions guy, everybody who ever put up a poster for me and spread the word," Keys said. Keys was accepting an award for her chart-topping hit, 'No One,' which received significant airplay on local radio stations across the country.

The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) is backing legislation that would require America's hometown broadcasters to compensate the foreign-owned record labels for radio airplay of music. The House version of the RIAA-backed bill was introduced by Reps. Howard Berman (D-CA) and Darrell Issa (R-CA). Companion legislation has been offered in the Senate by Sens. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Orrin Hatch (R-UT).

;

recommend This comment thread is now closed
1
CynicalPatriot

that is all I have right now.

I find myself posting anything that affects free speech/ free press and I ran across this by accident.

Don Mashak

The Cynical patriot

0
Roy C

I don't know enough about the particulars here to say anything but I have heard that the foreign record companies are receive compensation.

I don't know why a second round of payment would be due.

Got more info?

0
Jack Taylor

this is just another way for the obama people to raise taxes so that they

can pay for all of their give away programs.

0
CynicalPatriot

Hello Jack Taylor:

I have remained neutral as possible on the Obama Presidency until now.  The Dems kept saying give him 6 months.  Until now, i have not criticized much except broken campaign promises of no lobbyist in the  white house and no ear marks in the budget.  And also, the tax cheats nominated for high positions.  I would have voiced the same sentiments if it were a republican president doing the same things.

However, I feel I now am in a position to safety condemn this administration.  I do not want to live in a socialist country.  I don't want the value of the dollar destroyed.  This crap of jamming 300 pages at 3am in the morning the day before a vote is criminal.  What is in those 300 pages that cannot withstand the scrutiny of  waiting at least a week to allow people to examine this.

These are the tactics of other men in history that I am not allow to mention or I will be call a "fear mongerer" or "fringe element".

I am an American first and a Conservative Second.  What is happening would be wrong even if the Republicans were doing it.

The Democrats must be a cult or their own members would voice opposition to such tactics.

These thoughts were on my mind.

Respectfully,

Don Mashak

The Cynical Patriot


This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

QueensHart
First Flagged at 6:54 AM, Jun 11, 2009 by QueensHart

Related Stories

Recommendations (4)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from