NP Rank:
Mark Zuckerberg backs down on new Facebook terms of service
In a major relief to millions of die hard fans of social network site Facebook, your photographs, videos and comments on Facebook are still yours, at least for the moment.
The social networking website has posted a statement on its site saying it has reverted to its former terms of use policy after thousands of users objected furiously to the site's new policy.
Facing a federal complaint from a leading privacy advocacy organization and a revolt of tens of thousands of its users, Facebook on Tuesday night backed down from what many have seen as an onerous privacy policy.
![]()
Facebook informed all its users that it has, temporarily at least, reverted its terms of service to the previous version.
(Credit: Screenshot by CNET Networks)
The policy had seemed to grant Facebook perpetual rights to users' uploaded content, and the threatened complaint from the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) had demanded, essentially, that the social-networking service return to its previous terms.
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg wrote in a blog post late Tuesday that the company had decided to do just that
Crowd Power
-
Edmund Jenks
Los Angeles, California, United States -
stvalentine
California, United States -
mchawk
Maidenhead, United Kingdom -
edfrench
Lille, France -
mafik66
abadan, Iran -
blondino
Seattle, Washington, United States
Recommendations (24)
-
Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan 
Anonymous user
-
sara star
Halifax, NS, Canada -
mtammas
Vancouver, Canada -
Pythiian1
New York, New York, United States -
Blue Crush
Toronto, Canada -
Edmund Jenks
Los Angeles, California, United States




















Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (8)
at 04:46 on February 18th, 2009
Text, Photos, Video and other such items as long as original material have to remain in control of the one owning them or that created them. On all Web sites.
at 06:59 on February 18th, 2009
Can Facebook, or any social site for that matter, ever be trusted from this point forward?
It's a little like trusting an Obama Cabinet appointee to have paid all of his/her taxes before being placed into consideration for appointment.
at 07:44 on February 18th, 2009
Yeah, or trusting anyone in the former Bush administration to be ethical.
at 07:00 on February 18th, 2009
What did Zuckerberg think was going to happen? Why would he imagine that users would be anything other than angry?
at 07:44 on February 18th, 2009
Just to add: it's not that Facebook's change was all that big (they better be caching content, or pageloads would be measured in minutes), but it was poorly explained, and the public's reaction (or overreaction) was really predictable.
When you're as big as Facebook, you need to understand that all eyes are on you at all times, and the world's social networkers are an excitable bunch.
Source: techdirt.com
at 15:21 on February 18th, 2009
Good for the users and privacy advocacy organizations.
at 16:11 on February 18th, 2009
Who has 216 messages in their inbox? Let's see some upkeep. Geez
at 08:58 on February 19th, 2009
Bad marketing and PR is what is behind this.