Mark Zuckerberg backs down on new Facebook terms of service

by Sanjay Jha | February 18, 2009 at 04:40 am
422 views | 24 Recommendations | 8 comments

In a major relief to millions of die hard fans of social network site Facebook, your photographs, videos and comments on Facebook are still yours, at least for the moment.

The social networking website has posted a statement on its site saying it has reverted to its former terms of use policy after thousands of users objected furiously to the site's new policy.

Facing a federal complaint from a leading privacy advocacy organization and a revolt of tens of thousands of its users, Facebook on Tuesday night backed down from what many have seen as an onerous privacy policy.

Facebook informed all its users that it has, temporarily at least, reverted its terms of service to the previous version.

(Credit: Screenshot by CNET Networks)

The policy had seemed to grant Facebook perpetual rights to users' uploaded content, and the threatened complaint from the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) had demanded, essentially, that the social-networking service return to its previous terms.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg wrote in a blog post late Tuesday that the company had decided to do just that

Videos

Photos

The Spy who Superpoked me.

The Spy who Superpoked me.

see larger image

uploaded by mchawk

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
2
Uwe Paschen

Text, Photos, Video and other such items as long as original material have to remain in control of the one owning them or that created them. On all Web sites.

   

0
Edmund Jenks

Can Facebook, or any social site for that matter, ever be trusted from this point forward?

It's a little like trusting an Obama Cabinet appointee to have paid all of his/her taxes before being placed into consideration for appointment.

0
Texrat

Yeah, or trusting anyone in the former Bush administration to be ethical.

2
Jordan Yerman

What did Zuckerberg think was going to happen? Why would he imagine that users would be anything other than angry?

3
Jordan Yerman

Just to add: it's not that Facebook's change was all that big (they better be caching content, or pageloads would be measured in minutes), but it was poorly explained, and the public's reaction (or overreaction) was really predictable.

When you're as big as Facebook, you need to understand that all eyes are on you at all times, and the world's social networkers are an excitable bunch.

The point isn't that Facebook or any other company shouldn't change their TOS to better reflect their businesses and technology, but that in this day and age, any "minor" change is going to attract lots of scrutiny, and, in all likelihood, will be misunderstood and misinterpreted. This makes the handling of the change much more important than the change itself.


0
A. Tran

Good for the users and privacy advocacy organizations.

0
Robert Sutherland

Who has 216 messages in their inbox? Let's see some upkeep. Geez

0
Yuliya Talmazan

Bad marketing and PR is what is behind this.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Uwe Paschen
First Flagged at 4:46 AM, Feb 18, 2009 by Uwe Paschen
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (24)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from