Naked Scanners on Trial at Manchester Airport: Rapiscan Screeners

by Mary Richard | October 14, 2009 at 06:17 am
3916 views | 73 Recommendations | 15 comments

Videos

Airport's 'naked' scanners

see larger video

sourced by Mary Richard

Airport's 'naked' scanners

Do you get weary of having to remove your jacket and shoes while going through security at the airport?  Or getting the pat down?

How about the new alternative, showing all your naked glory to airport security staffers in the new Rapiscan people screeners?

A full body scanner has been introduced that produces "naked" pictures of passengers, and is now being used on a trial basis at Manchester Airport. 

There is no hiding place for breast enlargements, piercings, hip replacements and, more importantly, knives or guns.

This full body image will take away the hassle of undressing and will be seen by an anonymous security person in another room.

But it also means intimate parts of the human body will be revealed to airport staff.

This is already on the way in North America. The manufacturer, Rapiscan Systems has posted an announcement on their website that an order for $25M has been placed by the U.S. Transportation Security Administration.

We appreciate the confidence that TSA has demonstrated not only in the Secure 1000 Single Pose but also in Rapiscans program management, manufacturing, service and logistics capabilities by placing this significant first order. 

Will this be adapted throughout the world? Only time and technology will tell.

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
2
158

I seldom fly so this is not an issue for me.

I would prefer the scanner.

I doubt anyone would want to stare at my body.


2
Amy Judd

I don't know how I feel about this; it seems weird to me. I bet people will be lining up to apply for those security guard jobs though!

3
israeli.agent

A great disadvantage to terrorists and smugglers who always find very innovative ways to smuggle things into airplanes.

I wonder how religious and other fanatics would react to this. Let us find out if this is against any religion or not.

Run for the books...!

 

.Agent.

0
Mary Richard

Religion.  I hadn't thought of that, just children and privacy issues.  Hmm ...

2
israeli.agent

"... Didn't seem any faster to me..."

Maybe the authorities shoud provide special training and teach some survival techniques to the poor 'anon' operators.

Definitely their union is going to protest this move..!

 

.Agent.

1
Spydermonkey

Tighter security at the gate will not stop a determined terrorist, but a intelligent & flexible security team can prevent a lot more than a box run by a bored operator...

Remember, aircraft are not the only place we are vulnerable (but it does have a "fear factor" about it) & these people are very good at finding holes & exploiting them. If we just try & plug all the holes we will just block all our freedoms in the process...

War Begets War...


1
Mary Richard


They say it's safe, and being used at some airports in the US and Canada already.  It's getting a favorable reaction too, apparently.

The scanner uses Terahertz radiation, a band that lies between microwaves and infrared. The so-called "T-rays" carry much less energy than X-rays, which means that while they can penetrate a layer of clothing, they cannot penetrate materials such as water and metal. This also makes them much safer than X-rays.
4
Concerned1

I don't really want some random person seeing my naked body but more importantly what about kids? My daughter is going through pubity and needs her privacy, she would be traumatised knowing a strange man or woman is seeing her naked body. Also would it pick up tampons as "strange" packages, can it see inside the body?

2
mudricky

I saw this on the television set.

2
anarkissed

I see the advantages of this technology but it's sure disturbing putting that kind of opportunity in the hands of authoritative strangers.   How long till this is so common that they think it's okay to make cracks and laugh at people?  Or perhaps they'll get so immune that they manage to stay professional.  I dunno.  

I do know I already will choose any alternative transport possible over flying, which used to thrill me unendingly, simply the restrictions are enough.  I don't go where I can't take my survival pocket tools!

2
Tomitheos Linardos

wow! there will be no privacy in the future..!

0
Great idea

Concerned1 above, is worried about her daughter, why?You will not be able to see the man/lady behind the monitor, neither will he/she see you. So why would you care what they see? If you act calmly, your children will be calm. It's not that you see yourself naked while being scanned. As for somebody seeing me naked, who cares. Poor man/lady is going to be sick and tired staring at naked bodies after the second hour in any case! At least I would feel safer, knowing that it has been made more difficult for those whith devious plans to ruin my flight!

3
Grant McCahon

  Freedom is in it's death throes. Democracy is being diluted and basic human rights are eroded day after day without so much as a whimper anymore. How many years did we hear our grandparents tell us that they fought in wars to secure our freedom for the future, " Some gave their tomorrows for our todays " yet we just hand over our privacy, freedoms and democratic choices like some insignificant possessions. How long before we have a barcode on our forearm? Hitler would be proud.

2
Fio Carter

I'm really against the scanners fro more than one reason: First of all it's against basic human rights and ANY democratic state should be offended by the idea to take away the human rights of basically everyone who ever uses airplanes (I guess over half of the population). Another issue is that it's just embarrasing, maybe not for everyone, but it would be for me (maybe because I'm just 17, but I really really won't feel comfortable to know that there is some stranger that I don't even know seeing me naked). Anyway, what I wanted to say is that there are quite a lot of people who have similar feelings about this, especially many teenagers, but also others.Then there are the health risks, or the possible health issues that might occur from beeing scanned too many times. This technology is so new that no one can know for sure what it does to the human body and even though the governments say it's save, it doesn't have to be true. Not that the governments are generally lying, but who whould admit the possible risks, if the national security is concerned?Besides, I bet the high government officials wouldn't even have to use the body scanners. Is that a fair treatment?And last, but not least, I'm not quite sure that it would stop the terrorists. It's not even proven that terrorists smuggel weapons through security, I'd rather say that they have someone of the flight personel who helps them, because that's way more likely and in this case the body scanners whould be no good at all.You don't have to agree with me, but just think about it and create your own opinion.

2
Tomas Estrada-Palma

The government is lying about the scanners. You will be buck naked, data based and stored for future use. Certainly this young woman thought she was anonymous. Please find her and tell her she's naked on the Internet.tomasestradapalma4today.blogspot.com/

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Susan Marie Kovalinsky
First Flagged at 6:39 AM, Oct 14, 2009 by Susan Marie Kovalinsky
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in Tech & Biz

Recommendations (73)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from