Oil Companies Saved By Republicans

by VLOGZ | June 10, 2008 at 05:52 pm
254 views | 0 Recommendations | 2 comments

Photos

Oil Companies Saved By Republicans

Oil Companies Saved By Republicans

see larger image

uploaded by VLOGZ

WASHINGTON — Senate Republicans blocked a proposal Tuesday to tax the windfall profits of the largest oil companies, despite pleas by Democratic leaders to use the measure to address America's anger over $4 a gallon gasoline.

The Democratic energy package would have imposed a tax on any "unreasonable" profits of the five largest U.S. oil companies and given the federal government more power to address oil market speculation that the bill's supporters argue has added to the crude oil price surge.

"Americans are furious about what's going on," declared Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., and want Congress to do something about oil company profits and "an orgy of speculation" on oil markets.

But Republicans argued the Democratic proposal focusing on new oil industry taxes is not the answer to the country's energy problems.

"The American people are clamoring for relief at the pump," said Sen. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., but if taxes are increased on the oil companies "they will get exactly what they don't want. The bill will raise taxes, increase imports."

The Democrats failed, 51-43, to get the 60 votes needed to overcome a GOP filibuster and bring the energy package up for consideration.

Separately, Democrats also failed to get Republican support for a proposal to extend tax breaks for wind, solar and other alternative energy development, and for the promotion of energy efficiency and conservation. The tax breaks have either expired or are scheduled to end this year.

The tax provisions were included in a broader $50 billion tax measure blocked by a GOP filibuster threat. A vote to take up the measure was 50-44, short of the 60 votes needed.

The windfall profits bill would have imposed a 25 percent tax on profits over what would be determined "reasonable" when compared to profits several years ago. The oil companies could have avoided the tax if they invested the money in alternative energy projects or refinery expansion. It also would have rescinded oil company tax breaks _ worth $17 billion over the next 10 years _ with the revenue to be used for tax incentives to producers of wind, solar and other alternative energy sources as well as for energy conservation.

The legislation also would:

_Require traders to put up more collateral in the energy futures markets and open the way for federal regulation of traders who are based in the United States but use foreign trading platforms. The measures are designed to reduce market speculation.

_Make oil and gas price gouging a federal crime, with stiff penalties of up to $5 million during a presidentially declared energy emergency.

_Authorize the Justice Department to bring charges of price fixing against countries that belong to the OPEC oil cartel.

Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky has acknowledged that Americans are hurting from the high energy costs but strongly opposes the Democrats' response and has ridiculed those who "think we can tax our way out of this problem."

"Republicans by and large believe that the solution to this problem, in part, is to increase domestic production," McConnell said.

A GOP energy plan, rejected by the Senate last month, calls for opening a coastal strip of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska to oil development and to allow states to opt out of the national moratorium that has been in effect for a quarter century against oil and gas drilling in more than 80 percent of the country's coastal waters.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
SteelePop

Gas here in the San Francisco area is near $5/gallon already. It was very interesting to watch the oil company CEOs at a congressional hearing last week, or the week before. Interestingly they all said that tight supply is not the cause of the run up in prices, i.e., there is plenty of supply to meet needs. If this is true, a "free market" would keep prices stable or force them down, not drive them sharply higher. This means the price change is due to the financial markets and have nothing to do with the people who produce and consume oil. This is another bubble that is possible because so much money has been concentrated in so few hands that when those hands chase the "next great thing" they completely overwhelm whatever market they go after. Unlike the fairytale about the investor class putting their money to productive work, thus creating jobs and making the world better for working folks, "trickle down economics", they are gambling with the loot and putting us all at risk. To add insult to injury we give them our tax and social security money. If that's still not enough, we borrow money from them to give it back to them through tax breaks and pay them interest for their trouble.

0
René

This is infuriorating! Promises! Promises! Why weren't our presidential candidates (all Senators) proving their worth in this battle? The speculators don't have to put up much money? And US traders who use foreign platforms aren't regulated?

Require traders to put up more collateral in the energy futures markets and open the way for federal regulation of traders who are based in the United States but use foreign trading platforms.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from