One-year ban on new fast-food restaurants in South L.A.

by JeffHuang | July 23, 2008 at 01:40 pm
927 views | 5 Recommendations | 10 comments

Photos

Wendy's, Tim Hortons, Mississauga

Wendy's, Tim Hortons, Mississauga

see larger image

uploaded by Nikon Norm

Is this the beginning of a new movement towards banning fast-food chains?

Major corporations such as McDonalds is definitely going to fight hard over this decision. As of now, only South L.A. is doing this ban, but if more areas or even states follows suit, then this will become quite chaotic with lawsuits flying all over the place.
This bannishment has a lot of grey areas. What constitues as "fast food" and what should be ban and what shouldn't be banned. Subway gets a free pass on this ban, then why shouldn't McDonalds. There just seems to be too many grey areas and leniency towards certain companies. We will definitely be hearing more about this, and if other places decides to join in on this ban, it will be interesting what fast food chains will do to loop around some of the rules.


A proposal that would place at least a one-year moratorium on new fast-food restaurants in a broad swath of neighborhoods, mostly in South Los Angeles, won unanimous support from a Los Angeles City Council committee Tuesday.

If approved by the full council and signed by the mayor, the law would prevent fast-food chains from opening new restaurants in a 32-square-mile area, including West Adams, Baldwin Village and Leimert Park. The moratorium would be in effect for one year, with the possibility of two six-month extensions.

The measure, proposed by Councilwoman Jan Perry, whose 9th District includes much of South Los Angeles, defines a fast-food restaurant as "any establishment which dispenses food for consumption on or off the premises, and which has the following characteristics: a limited menu, items prepared in advance or prepared or heated quickly, no table orders and food served in disposable wrapping or containers."

Fast food chains are finding loop-holes in this new ban.

"McDonald's has been increasing the number of items on their menu, so at what point would they exceed that definition?" Huizar said.

There are still a lot of grey areas in this proposal

Perry said that after speaking with restaurant lobbyists, she amended her proposal to allow for "fast-food casual" restaurants, such as Subway or Pastagina, that do not have heat lamps or drive-through windows and that prepare fresh food to order.

Reason for this fast food ban

Perry said she has been attempting to address the health issues associated with fast food, such as diabetes and obesity. She is trying to persuade supermarket chains and sit-down restaurants to open in her district, which has been especially hard hit with such health problems.

"It's important to offer incentives to bring restaurants into an area, especially an area that has suffered prejudices and stereotypes," Perry said.



recommend This comment thread is now closed
nukemdomis
nukemdomis
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 20:32 on July 23rd, 2008

JeffHuang, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
streeter

This was taken in Singapore.

chrisstreeter has contributed a photo to this story.

0
PnOyMoDe

Taken After eating a meal at Carls Jr :]

PnOyMoDe has contributed a photo to this story.

iTroyboy
iTroyboy
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 01:48 on July 24th, 2008

JeffHuang, I like this story. It's good stuff.

I myself am a fast food enthusiast, if you will. I understand the underlying meaning of limiting fast food chains to open "new" restaurants in an already saturated market. But if the lawmakers' intent is to make "fast food" restaurants more accountable for serving fresh, healthier foods, then I feel that they may be going about it in the wrong direction.

But is there an easier I answer? At this point, I'm afraid not. This type of ordinance certainly brings more attention to the consumers about healthier choices in the food they eat. But ultimately consumers will be the ones to determine if the market will support the moratorium for the long term. And in the land of America, having a choice, wether good or bad, will always win out in the end.

0
tchitchi

This is the only subway restaurant in Zurich (CH)

tchitchi has contributed a photo to this story.

0
thedowneyconservancy

Vintage picture of Carl's Jr.

The Downey Conservancy has contributed a photo to this story.

0
super_suz

super_suz has contributed a photo to this story.

0
frankophilia

i love fast food....but in moderation

frankophilia has contributed a photo to this story.

0
mawabunga

It was interesting to see this warning legend at the door of this Carl“s Jr. at Pleasanton, California. Nobody seemed to care about the warning sign, many people had their meal at the restaurant day after day.

mawabunga has contributed a photo to this story.

0
teh_oo_ice

this is the 1st time i eat carls jr. fast food,
what can i say is it taste fresh, and tasty.

for the pricing is worth for what you get,
crispy fries, huge burger, free pickles, and lot choices for drinks.

for me its much better than eat "M" brand fast food,
its worth for a try. trust me!! *wink*

teh_oo_ice has contributed a photo to this story.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

nukemdomis
First Flagged at 8:32 PM, Jul 23, 2008 by nukemdomis
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in Tech & Biz

Recommendations (5)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from