OWS/Tea Party Convergence - moment dreaded by the 1%

by DrMarty | October 12, 2011 at 03:51 am
350 views | 6 Recommendations | 9 comments

Photos

the true, not the bastardized, spirit of the American Revolution

the true, not the bastardized, spirit of the American Revolution

see larger image

uploaded by DrMarty

In a not so distant future, the following argument may take place, between a Tea Party advocate and an Occupy advocate, where the Tea Partier says, "You Keynesians, if you really wanted to attack Wall Street, you'd reinstate Glass- Steagall!" And the Occupier would counter, "You Friedmanites, if you really wanted to attack Wall Street, you'd reinstate Glass Steagall!" 

The right supports it -  If you listened to Michael Savage's conservative nationwide AM-radio talk show last night you would have heard an exchange with a caller who was defending the OWS demos (which Savage considers "vermin" and "jerks"). Savage was disparaging the demos as "communist," etc., but then berated the caller, saying, "if you really want to reform Wall Street, you want to restore Glass-Steagall!" Apparently, neither the OWS caller, nor Savage, realized that Glass-Steagall leads the list of protest demands. Savage is a staunch critic of the OWS demos, but, as it turns out, also of "uncontrolled speculation," and features the repeal of Glass-Steagall in his book, "Trickle Up Poverty." 

The left supports it - Former Clinton Labor Secretary Robert Reich, writing in today's Christian Science Monitor, questions whether the Occupy movement will infiltrate the Democrats as the Tea Party has the Republicans; identifies the bailout as the common origin of both protests; and how Glass-Steagall would address it. "...Most tellingly, it was President Obama's unwillingness to place conditions on the bailout of Wall Street -- not demanding, for example, that the banks reorganize the mortgages of distressed homeowners, and that they accept the resurrection of the Glass-Steagall Act, as conditions for getting hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars -- that contributed to the new populist insurrection. The Wall Street bailout fueled the Tea Party (at the Utah Republican convention that ousted incumbent Republican Senator Robert Bennett in 2010, the mob repeatedly shouted TARP! TARP! TARP!), and it surely fuels some of the current fulminations of Occupy Wall Street..." 

What do the Occupiers say? - An article in the Chicago SunTimes, posted late Monday, lists the complete demands of the OccupyChicago movement to the left of the article text, as it appears on the computer screen. A modified version of the "official" Occupy Wall Street list, it nonetheless leads with Glass-Steagall as the number one item. Glass-Steagall is also mentioned in the article text, as follows: "...Leading off a list of 12 points was a wonkish [sic] one, a demand for the reinstatement of the federal Glass-Stegall Act, which kept banks out of the securities business. It's repeal in 1999 was a precursor to the financial speculation leading to the housing bust and a deep U.S. recession..." A "live Blog" from the "Speakers Corner" of the New York Occupy demos, proves that Glass-Steagall is a known theme among the demonstrators. At 3:22, "Woman from Maine came down to share her views. She wants to see the Glass-Steagall Act brought back. She wants to see a debt relief on student loans -- and she says Wall Street can pick up the tab. She wants to see an end to the rapid/computer-driven trades on Wall Street." At 2:29, "Man speaking now says the folks on Wall Street don't really create a thing ... it's all funny money, they move assets from one account to another. Says we took away the "adult supervision" and that Wall Street needs more regulation -- not less. Then he says the young generation is drawn to Wall Street for the money -- and that's causing a huge drain in other areas like education and medicine. Says it's time to bring back the Glass-Steagall Act... ends by saying, Bring back the sanity." At 1:31, "[Unemployed] Jacob has a sign saying, "Bill Clinton, Why did you remove the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933?" And just under that -- "Mr. Bush, Why did you rape the US?" Interviewed in the Burlington [Vermont] Free Press, the home-town Senator is all for the Occupy protests. In response to the question, "How does Wall Street consolidate money and power?" Sen. Bernie Sanders says, "One example from a political a perspective: when Wall Street wanted more deregulation, over a 10-year period, they spent $5 billion in lobbying and campaign contributions to do away with Glass-Steagall, to do away with the regulations that had prevented them from getting into this hyper-speculative mode. Five billion dollars to get what they wanted! That's extraordinary power." 

What does the financial press say? -  An "opinion" piece by financial writer and former Senate staffer Jeff McCord is featured in BusinessInsider, today, where he lobbies for Glass-Steagall. Apparently not aware that Glass- Steagall is already a demand of the OWS movement, McCord puts it second in his list of "suggestions" to OWS demonstrators. "As the lion of the Federal Reserve, Paul Volcker, and others have been saying for several years, it is time to restore the Glass- Steagall Act's separation of commercial banking from investment banking. Congress and the Clintonites (in unholy alliance with then Senator Phil Gramm, R-TX, and now Governor Rick Perry's adviser-mentor) made a serious and very expensive blunder in gutting Glass-Steagall..." An Oct. 7 NYT posting by Joe Nocera, "Revenge of the Gougers," mainly about credit card fees, reposted in today's eTaiwanTimes, sees the repeal of Glass-Steagall as pivotal. "It was, to be sure, a different world then, with regulated interest rates, the Glass-Steagall Act preventing banks from getting into lucrative trading and a sleepy business model that valued a steady dividend over a high-flying stock price. As interest rates were deregulated, Glass-Steagall abolished and investors demanded that bank stocks perform like Internet stocks, that ethos changed. Banks began looking in some dark corners for new revenue; this is when hidden fees began to creep into credit-card agreements, for instance..." A posting on CNNMoney by Jennifer Liberto says "The Volcker rule is a nod toward Glass-Steagall, a Depression-era law that Congress repealed in 1999. Glass-Steagall had prevented commercial banks from dabbling in investment banking. Some critics argue that its demise paved the way for deposit-taking banks to make colossal bad bets, while bank traders chased profits and big bonuses. But the draft rule that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. is expected to release on Tuesday goes much easier on the banks than the originally proposed blanket ban on proprietary trading. The rule got watered down in Congress, which enacted a broad Wall Street reform law in 2010..."

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
1
Karen Hatter

That would be an interesting conversation!

Glass/Steagall acted as a firewall of protection. 

If, at the time of its demise, or more correctly, as it was dismantled, it was thought to be archaic, it should have been revamped to address the emerging so called exotic products being peddled by Wall Street movers and shakers.  

1
DrMarty

Karen,

Thanks for your insight.  The left and right have been played like puppets while the scumbags laugh on the sidelines.  Although there may be agreement on this issue, it's a ways before we see Glass Steagall reimplemented; although there are quite a few signing on to Mary Kaptur's bill in Congress.  Exotic=unfamiliar; totally against the underlying assumptions of the market system, ceteris paribus.  Flesh-eating bacteria are exotic.  Next action for OWS is occupy schools of economics for peddling the crap we are taught is a science.  It's a con game that needs exposure.

1
The 1

Thats one long paragraph..lol Need to break that up a little..Might help to clarify points in the article.

Of interest:

FDIC rule would prevent banks trading for profit

 

1
DrMarty

You have a point.  I'll edit the text and maybe add paragraph headings.  Thanks.

0
YankeeJim

Dr. Marty, we are being played like puppets. Who is Gepetto?

0
Scrivener

OWS and Tea Party:  Both psyops spawned by the same intel agents? Both fronted by agit-prop rent-a-protester phonies.  Difference is, the Tea Partiers are phony automatons of the Security State, while OWS is fronted by rent-a-protester phonies, a "honeypot" to ferret out alleged "dissidents" so they can be thrown into the Security State's extrajudicial persecution matrix, thus bolstering the bottom line of the defense contractors who profit from the war on (genuine, not "controlled opposition") dissent. Read this by a veteran journalist:

http://nowpublic.com/world/thugocracy-u-s-fed-police-vigilantes-persecute-citizen-targets

0
DrMarty

Scrivener,

I value your insights.  I am excited that this story generated so much interest.  While I share some of your views, I take what you describe as controlling factors of reality in our time as an overlay to what we must do as individuals if we are not to be made impotent, politically.  Yes, all those things you describe may be true, but... It is what comes after the "but" that we all must advance.  What I mean is.... think of the generic hero who is shot multiple times, but manages to crawl on hands and knees on his/her way to safety to save the baby, who turns out to make a difference in world history, or something like that.  Our job is to hit at our enemies at their weakest flank, in spite of all the power and control they possess.  It seems occupying Wall Street is freaking out the enemies of the 99%... left and right media just can't figure out how the movement continues to be relevant without a leader who can be bought off so "all can go home now."  If the demand for the one change in financial reform, re-implementing Glass Steagall controls on speculative finance, stays in focus, and there's no guarantee that it will, a revolution will have been won.  It's the mouse that scared the elephant, the termite that killed the mighty oak, the kid who saw a king without clothes.  Yes, all those things you say are true, but... Thank God for people who find the weak link of society's enemies.  

0
akindependent

The most fundamental issue they should agree on is reforming campaign finance laws.  The ungodly amounts of money needed to mount a campaign means that politicians will always be beholden to corporate America, and our laws will reflect their interests.  I find it hard to imagine what this country would look like if our elected officials actually voted for what they thought was best for their constituents and our country.  Seems like a pipedream.

0
nanute

Dr.Marty,

I'm late to the party. Yesterday's NY Times had a story on the Volker rule. When Volker submitted it to be considered in the Dodd/Frank legislation the rule was a mere 3 pages. Fast forward, and as a result of push back and lobbying by financial institutions, it is now 300 pages in length. As a result of all this "negotiating", to create exceptions (read loopholes), financial institutions are now crying that the rules are too complicated. It reminds me of the story of the kid that kills his parents and then laments that he's an orphan.

To your main point on Glass-Stegal: It would have been wiser to revise the rules to accommodate current global finance competitiveness. Instead, we got repeal, along with excluding derivatives from regulations and oversight. Brilliant! In case you didn't see the news, last week Bank of America moved 74 Trillion in derivative "assets" to FDIC insured accounts in a last ditch effort to stave off inevitable bankruptcy. If this action is allowed to stand, BOA will be allowed to borrow from the discount window using these so called assets as collateral. 


What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Karen Hatter
First Flagged at 11:31 AM, Oct 12, 2011 by Karen Hatter
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (6)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from