Please boycott Wikipedia and Nature
plus: scientific proof the internet is controlled by big brother
“Dear Mr Micheal,
The Editor thanks you for your communication but regrets that he is unable to publish it. He regrets also that he cannot enter into further correspondence on this matter.
Manuscript Administration, Nature”
“he”? That's a dead-give-away! ;) How freaking sexist! [giggle] When I wrote my articles on the Round Table, I deliberately used the more neutral “they” and “their” over “he” and “his” and no: you don't have to speak plurally to use them. More seriously, Wikipedia has also snubbed me three times attempting to publish legitimate statements/articles about: quantum realism, Caroline Thompson, and Adenier's refutation of Bell's theorem. Nature rejected two articles and I sincerely doubt they will ever publish me.. Please boycott Nature and Wikipedia in protest! :) Let's show some solidarity! :)
Btw, I now have unequivocal scientific proof the internet is controlled by big brother. Or conversely, I need to thank Anonymous (point #25) for my web-hits on Scribd. ;) Check this out:
“opinion by sam_micheal | 2 days ago 40 views | 0 recommendations | 1 comment”
“Reads: 753 Uploaded: 01/28/2012”
This never happened to me before. 48 hours and 750 views! Thank you Anonymous! :)
So which is it? Both? It can't be a 'fluke' .. We all know there's no such things as 'internet flukes'.. My only articles that got that many reads took months and months.. ^^ So it must be both or Anonymous! Either way, Anonymous participated! :) Anonymous, you rock! :) The only sad thing is.. If indeed Anonymous participated, that means my article did not get viewed by 753 visitors. :( Just 753 net-bots. :( [giggle] .. I wonder if bots can understand English yet.. ;)
If they can, “take me to your leader” :P [giggle]
..sigh.. Silliness aside, I ask again please: boycott Wikipedia and Nature.. They're draconian.
sam iam, 2012/JAN/30
ps to Anonymous: feel free to shut down Wikipedia/Nature's servers at your convenience.