NP Rank:
Protesting arises in Oshawa after GM is set to scrap 4 production plants
What is new in the world of GM? Coming on the heels of a massive buyout in the US of 19,000 workers, an announcement was made this morning that GM will be closing down four North American plants. Manufacturing SUV's and pickup-trucks, these plants couldn't weather the developments in the global oil prices and had to be axed, according to chief executive Rick Wagoner.
As a response to this announcement, hundreds of workers moved to set up a blockade near the plant.
Several
hundred General Motors workers have set up a blockade near the GM plant
in Oshawa, Ont., to protest the automaker's announcement that is will
cease production at the plant's pickup truck facility in 2009."We're demanding General
Motors reverse their decision," Canadian Auto Workers Local 222
president Chris Buckley told Canwest News Service this morning."We want a meeting with General Motors and we'll be here as long as it takes."
About 100 CAW members are involved and are preventing anyone from driving into the site via Colonel Sam Boulevard. However, workers are being allowed to pass the blockade on foot.
"I am encouraging my
members to remains on their jobs," Buckley added. "I want my members to
continue to build the best trucks and cars in the industry."
Speakingto reporters in a conference call ahead of the automaker's annualmeeting, Wagoner said the Oshawa plant, east of Toronto, will ceaseproduction in 2009 "and we don't have plans to allocate futureproducts" - meaning a probable permanent closure.
It's also "unlikely" there will be new mandates for the otherplants affected by Tuesday's announcement, two in the United States andone in Mexico, as GM moves "to address the rapid industry shift awayfrom trucks and SUVs."
As the market for pickups and large sport utility vehiclesvaporized amid high gasoline prices and slumping construction-industrydemand, the Oshawa plant lost one shift last year and GM announced inApril that the second shift would end in September. Each shiftrepresented about 1,000 production workers, plus associatedtradespeople.
Closureof the plant means GM will no longer produce trucks in Canada and willbe reduced to one auto plant in Oshawa and a share of a joint-ventureplant in Ingersoll, Ont.
Savings target
GM, which has lost a combined $51bn over the past three years, said it had no plans to allocate products to the four affected plants in the future.
The closures will save the firm $1bn a year from 2010, it said.
However, Mr Wagoner said GM was not ready to lay out a timetable for returning to profitability.
GM shares have lost almost 60% of their value since their peak in October 2007.
'Behind the curve'
Some analysts said that GM had dithered over what to do with the Hummer brand.
"Unfortunately, it's just a sign that once again they're behind the curve," said Peter Jankovskis, a chief investment officer with Oak Brook Investments, which owns GM shares in some of its portfolios.
"If they were looking to sell the Hummer brand, the more sensible thing would have been to do it three years ago," he added.
"They're not going to get anything for it. Just in terms of timing, it's a very poor example."
Crowd Power
-
joits23
West Covina, California, United States -
straightedge217
Springfield, Illinois, United States -
Mustangmatt
North Peel Regional Municipality (Kleinburg), Ontario, Canada -
msmail
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States -
bigmikelakers
Lawndale, California, United States -
princedl
Batavia, Ohio, United States -
Jobe Roco
Lafayette, Louisiana, United States -
cfoxtrot
Southgate, Michigan, United States -
chrisclan127@sbcglobal.net
Tallmadge, Ohio, United States -
t13
Arlington, Virginia, United States -
Jimbonegro
Oviedo, Asturias, Spain -
KimCo.
New York, New York, United States -
jimbohoo2003
Denver, Colorado, United States -
jamiperry-livsmom
Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, United States -
Sebastian Bergmann
Germany -
Infiniti.guy
Canada -
35ford
Tyler, Texas, United States -
Swanee 3
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States -
MADMATTHEW2008
Saint Charles, Michigan, United States -
hansenbrian
Riverton, Utah, United States -
azhben
Omaha, Nebraska, United States -
juan8armenta
Phoenix, Arizona, United States -
grncivic03
Deer Park, Texas, United States -
patrick_j
Fort Worth, Texas, United States -
dbh9828
Grand Forks, North Dakota, United States -
toolnorth
Burnsville, Minnesota, United States -
tagz_1977
Wyandotte, Michigan, United States -
pinguy
Canada -
Steven Harrell
Springfield, Massachusetts, United States -
afm1405
Arlington, Texas, United States -
luciddaemon
Orange, California, United States -
jchav62
Santa Fe, New Mexico, United States -
parsons206
London, Ohio, United States -
Chris Lehmann
Australia -
j_gelernter9
Canada -
Wayne1961
Anderson, Indiana, United States -
argosytech
China Grove, North Carolina, United States -
lexmotors.com
Lexington, South Carolina, United States -
Darilov
Jackson Heights, New York, United States -
Schlüsselbein2007
Plano, Texas, United States -
Huizen
Canada -
dozer63
Montrose, Missouri, United States -
codylusnia
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States -
dominik.kreutz
Germany -
gallai
Switzerland (Confoederatio Helvetica) -
fastlane
Houston, Texas, United States -
r.mcneill
Douglas, Massachusetts, United States -
biblicone
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States -
Mark Riley
Franklin, Tennessee, United States -
CreaseKeeper28
Levittown, Pennsylvania, United States -
x_philes
Carmel, Indiana, United States -
Abdullah S. Al-Salloum
Kuwait -
chrishammond
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States -
GTM
Kuwait -
octaneguy95
Placentia, California, United States














Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (11)
at 13:58 on June 3rd, 2008
I hate to see these great truck plants shut down. I love GM/Chevy pickups.
35ford has contributed a photo to this story.
at 15:17 on June 3rd, 2008
Have you looked inside the engine lately? Have you ever seen anything more complex? Used to be so accessible and easy to fix, many owners did their own upkeep and repairs.
And what happened to all those innovative carburators that cut gas consumption way down? too bad the oil and auto industry bought them all up and buried them instead of putting them to good use. Maybe we wouldn't be in the situations we find ourselves in now.
at 19:20 on June 3rd, 2008
this is my truck. wich was passed down to me from my father.. this truck has been in our family for over 10 years now.. and i enjoy driving it every where i go..
juan8armenta has contributed a photo to this story.
at 22:10 on June 3rd, 2008
Hay all, took a nice photo of the 2007 Chevrolet Silverado, one of my best and favourite cars, we don't get many in Australia, since they don't sell them here.
Chris Lehmann has contributed a photo to this story.
at 04:51 on June 4th, 2008
The morning of March 9 2008 after 50 cm of snow. It took a while to dig out the vehicles. Half buried in the snow are a 1985 Buick Regal and a 1982 Chevy Silverado Pickup.
pinguy has contributed a photo to this story.
at 05:11 on June 4th, 2008
the maroon Trailblazers are Fastlane's Turbo Trailblazer SS preparing for it's 10.7 sec. 1/4 mile run. it's a really heavy SUV but we still made it go fast.
fastlane has contributed a photo to this story.
at 05:25 on June 4th, 2008
Maybe GM should start making small cars like this (see link).
GTM has contributed a photo to this story.
at 06:20 on June 4th, 2008
GM has plenty of woes but not as much as Ford. The American automakers need to think more progressively and adapt to changing times. Families still need a larger vehicle for convenience and comfort but the days of the 12 MPG gas guzzlers are behind us. New and Used truck and SUV sales along with wholesale values have plummeted since late 2007. Gas guzzling inventory is sitting on dealers lots and the values keep dropping. Many dealerships won't survive. A fresh inventory and offering a product that the public wants is paramount.
The federal government has put a bill in place forcing automakers to have all vehicles meet an industry standard of at least 22 MPG (I believe that is the number). The current technology and weight limitations make it nearly impossible for this to happen. This standard will never see the light of day. As it nears, auto lobbyist will have it axed as unrealistic. It has to be sales that drive change not government and sales will dictate which automaker survives and who fails. The sooner manufacturers like GM get aggressive towards better fuel economy the better off they'll be.
lexmotors.com has contributed a photo to this story.
at 06:21 on June 4th, 2008
One day the SUV will live again
at 09:58 on June 4th, 2008
Nice truck but eats too much gas!
Darilov has contributed a photo to this story.
at 06:00 on June 16th, 2008
we love are trucks just not the gas prices
MADMATTHEW2008 has contributed a photo to this story.