Truemors
Even if you play with the contrast, still no necklace appears!
+++
Regarding the anomalies in the two famous "Sarah Palin pregnancy pictures":
HERE IS THE DIRECT COMPARISON BETWEEN THE PICTURES:
www.flickr.com/photos/32527116@N06/3093518201/
There is no necklace visible at all in the picture during the interview!
You can very clearly see in the comparison of the enhanced shots that there is no necklace in the picture during the interview (everything else stayed the same - contrast, brightness etc.).
It should also not be forgotten that this picture was uploaded to the internet by Erik99559 on 31th August 2008 - two days after Sarah Palin was nominated as John McCain's running mate! At this time, quite a lot of "strange occurences" on the internet took place - see the manipulation of Sarah Palins's Wikipedia entry etc.
Just through our research today I heard that it was Andrea Gusty herself (the journalist in the shot during the interview) that gave those pictures to www.factcheck.org - as a proof that Sarah Palin was "indeed" pregnant!
See this video here:
www.factcheck.org/just-the-facts/this_little_piggy_went_t...
(starting at 1:19)
And factcheck.org swallowed the bait - killing the discussion about the pregnancy in the MSM.
May I also point to apparent anomalies regarding the EXIF-data (you get this information if you click on the original photographs on flickr under "more properties").
Here (for the original shots in the strea of Erik99559):
www.flickr.com/photos/30076181@N02/2814979078/meta/in/pho...www.flickr.com/photos/30076181@N02/2814199887/meta/in/pho...
Here is the short version of the EXIF-data:
www.flickr.com/photos/32527116@N06/3094757954/
It is not relevant in my opinion that the date shows a day in 2005. However, and may a more knowledgable person please correct me if I am wrong: The time (minutes, seconds) cannot easily be manipulated! The time keeps running.
The picture WITHOUT the necklace 23:26:00.
The picture WITH the necklace was taken at 23:29:14.
There was just 3 min 14 sec between those two shots! They show two completely different situations - and SP took the necklace on and off in between??
I hope that I could make clearer why we think that these observations are important.
Therefore, Andrea Gusty played an extremely important part in "debunking" the rumours that SP was not pregnant with Trig. Let's put her to the test now.
+++
The original links from ERIK99559 are:
www.flickr.com/photos/30076181@N02/2814199887/in/photostr...www.flickr.com/photos/30076181@N02/2814979078/in/photostr...
Comments (0)