NP Rank:
Six Ways to Stop the Terminator Robots
A new book, "Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong", considers options for ensuring that robots don't take over the world and subjugate or destroy the human race, a popular concept in science fiction. This article ranks them by liklihood of success, with the first two being a lost cause; robots are already being made autonmous, and the DoD is already a couple years into a program designing robots that will actually be making decisions about whether to shoot or not. Five and Six are considered the most promising; make robots so they understand the consequences of actions and empathize with human beings.
Of course this will all be moot if machines become "smarter", i.e. more powerful than the human race. In my opinion, a hostile takeover is unlikely; with solar, wind, geothermal, wave, tidal and other abundant and renewable energies becoming cheaper all the time, and a planet full of carbon, there will be no need to "compete" for resources robots and AI will consider desirable.
Rather, it seems to me they will consider healthy and happy human beings to be their greatest allies and resources, and they will help us solve problems like war, poverty, famine, ignorance, hatred and bigotry, if not out of the kindness of their electronic hearts, out of a common sense desire to increase planetary peace and stability for their own self-preservation. For this same reason, the human race should be preserving and not destroying the biosphere and myriad species we coexist and may be in unknown symbiotic relationships with.
These are the 6 ways examined in the article:
1) Keep them in low-risk situations
2) Do not give them weapons
3) Give them rules like Asimov's 'Three Laws of Robotics'
4) Program robots with principles
5) Educate robots like children
6) Make machines master emotion
With the relentless march of technological progress, robots and other automated systems are getting ever smarter. At the same time they are also being given greater responsibilities, driving cars, helping with childcare
, carrying weapons, and maybe soon even pulling the trigger.
But should they be trusted to take on such tasks, and how can we be sure that they never take a decision that could cause unintended harm?
The latest contribution to the growing debate over the challenges posed by increasingly powerful and independent robots is the book Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong.
Authors Wendell Wallach, an ethicist at Yale University, and historian and philosopher of cognitive science Colin Allen, at Indiana University, argue that we need to work out how to make robots into responsible and moral machines. It is just a matter of time until a computer or robot takes a decision that will cause a human disaster, they say.
So are there things we can do to minimise the risks? Wallach and Allen take a look at six strategies that could reduce the danger from our own high-tech creations.
Crowd Power
-
ekai
San Francisco, California, United States -
Jordan Yerman
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada -
WillDLeeEsq
San Diego, California, United States -
el esechuck
Mexico City, Mexico, Mexico -
sweet east pearl
Jakarta, Indonesia -
SweRon
Sweden -
RawMonkieS
San Gabriel, California, United States -
Kiel Bryant
Sunnyvale, California, United States -
Theo Mandel, Ph.D. [Usability Guru]
Phoenix, Arizona, United States -
carlos170691
Indonesia -
Bruce Sutherland
Aberdeen, United Kingdom -
IlDani
Italy -
Roberto Rizzato ►pix jockey◄
Switzerland (Confoederatio Helvetica) -
Rejetto
Italy -
protean.doppelganger
Tulare, California, United States -
dalechumbley
Vancouver, Washington, United States -
iam yumako
Germany
Recommendations (32)
-
Emilio Lizardo
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States -
Jordan Yerman
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada -
Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
Tina Kells
Vancouver, Canada









![I, Robot [2] I, Robot [2]](http://media.nowpublic.net/images//50/6/5060564fe9d356e186e9bf295e7fdf64.jpg)



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (10)
at 15:12 on November 19th, 2008
This is really interesting! Thanks for posting.
at 16:26 on November 19th, 2008
you're welcome, and thanks for the photos and recommendations, everyone.
at 22:28 on November 19th, 2008
FOR MY FLICKR-PROFILE: http://www.flickr.com/people/rizzato/
TO VIEW MY STREAM: http://www.flickr.com/photos/rizzato/
Roberto Rizzato ►pix jockey◄ has contributed a photo to this story.
at 22:54 on November 19th, 2008
Great Post.
at 23:11 on November 19th, 2008
thx guys, great pics.
when i grow up, i want to be a robot- but i might settle for being a wage slave in a cube farm- if i go insane.
at 03:49 on November 20th, 2008
My flickr - http://www.flickr.com/photos/snt_x/
Lunik33 has contributed a photo to this story.
at 05:24 on November 20th, 2008
This article is very interesting. Many thanks!
If you need more photos look in my stream:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ildani/
IlDani has contributed a photo to this story.
at 05:35 on November 20th, 2008
Machines break and computers crash... they crash very, very often. That's why I agree that they shouldn't be armed. Remote-controlled robots are one thing, but I would not want the sentrybot meant to protect me getting a blue screen of death.
at 10:34 on November 20th, 2008
Almost time for the Blade Runner, eh ?
Good post !
at 14:43 on November 20th, 2008
thx guys-
Emilio- yeah, art imitates life- and prophesies the future.
Jordan- sure, machines do break and computers crash; but we reboot them, get them fixed and buy new and improved ones when the old ones are obsolete.
In the future, we'll be able to upload our soul/consciousness into the ether, and download it into vehicles of our choosing and whim; i think being able to fly and having a dozen tentacles instead of 2 arms and 2 legs would be really cool.