Twitter Conversations Come To A Screaming Halt; Users Simply Move To Friendfeed

by kferaday | June 27, 2008 at 09:52 pm
359 views | 7 Recommendations | 4 comments

Photos

Is twitter a serious business tool or just a complete waste of time?

Is twitter a serious business tool or just a complete waste of time?

see larger image

uploaded by andrewgrill

I've become a bit addicted to Twitter in the past while. I've been playing with it and if you subscribe to the right feeds it can be a great way to keep up on whatever you're interested in. I wish I could find more tech feeds that were directly related to work.

This morning however, I couldn't even get on to the site. "Net net" (as VP sales at my old company used to say) they can't start putting that $15M to work fast enough.

 

A key feature of Twitter has been down most of this week: Replies. The core Twitter service itself is alive, but the team took the Reply feature down on Tuesday when the service started to slow. As of now, Friday afternoon, Replies are still down.

Disabling certain features is Twitter’s recent attempt to keep their frail architecture from failing completely. They tried it out during Apple’s recent WWDC keynote and it worked, so they’re clearly using this approach more often now to deal with problems.

But here’s the problem - Replies was the wrong feature to turn off (whether there was a choice in the matter or not). The beautiful thing about Twitter is that spontaneous, diverse conversations erupt that are almost synchronous, or chat like (see our post about Quotably, which pulls these conversations out and highlights them). Conversations are what makes Twitter magic.

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
Heiky
Heiky
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 01:34 on June 28th, 2008

kferaday, I like this story. It's good stuff.
I'm actually quite annoyed with twitter's constant technical difficulties. I know what it means to not be able to reply. Really sucks.

Thanks for posting this!

0
mgmirkin

Is the title accurate to the story contents? I don't see anything in *this* article about users switching services / protocols or whatever. Is that part of the title really necessary if it's not going to be covered in the article? It sounds like users are simply switching from one program to another competitor program? But the article on NowPublic says nothing of it? If users are fleeing a sinking ship, wouldn't that be important? Or will they be back once Twitter starts working properly again?

Could probably use a bit more detail / exegesis. Just my 2c.

Cheers,

~Michael Gmirkin

0
kferaday

The title was picked up from the original TechCrunch post. The reference to the switch to FriendFeed is towards the end of the post.

andrewgrill
andrewgrill
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 05:42 on June 28th, 2008

kferaday, I like this story. It's good stuff.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Heiky
First Flagged at 1:34 AM, Jun 28, 2008 by Heiky
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in Tech & Biz

 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from