U.S. Army warns of twittering terrorists

by Maireid Sullivan | October 28, 2008 at 04:35 pm
89 views | 17 Recommendations | 6 comments

Why is Twitter different from all the other social network sites? E.g. Facebook, chief among them, because it was basically founded by people from within the CIA and DoD, etc. Maybe Twitter is a competitor :) That would be funny! ...and, for that matter, what about Google and especially Google earth?

U.S. Army warns of twittering terrorists–By Steven Musil–

The introduction to an Army intelligence report on "Potential for Terrorist Use of Twitter."

(Credit: FSA.org)

The U.S. intelligence community is concerned that terrorists might use micro-blogging tool Twitter to coordinate attacks, according to a purported draft Army intelligence report posted on the Web.

The report--present by the 304th Military Intelligence Battalion and posted to the Federation of American Scientists Web site--examines the possible ways terrorists could use mobile and Web technologies such as the Global Positioning System, digital maps, and Twitter mashups to plan and execute terrorist attacks.

The report (PDF), which appears to have been first presented earlier this month, was reported Friday by Wired magazine's Noah Shachtman. A chapter titled "Potential for Terrorist Use of Twitter," presents general, introductory information on Twitter and how it works, and describes how the service was used to report details of a recent earthquake in Los Angeles and by activists at the Republican National Convention.

"Twitter has also become a social activism tool for socialists, human rights groups, communists, vegetarians, anarchists, religious communities, atheists, political enthusiasts, hacktivists and others to communicate with each other and to send messages to broader audiences," the report said.

he report goes on to say:

Twitter is already used by some members to post and/or support extremist ideologies and perspectives. Extremist and terrorist use of Twitter could evolve over time to reflect tactics that are already evolving in use by hacktivists and activists for surveillance. This could theoretically be combined with targeting.

The report describes hacktivists as politically motivated hackers.

The report also described scenarios in which terrorists could leverage "potential adversarial use of Twitter," such as planning ambushes or detonating explosives:

Scenario 1: Terrorist operative "A" uses Twitter with (or without) a cell phone camera/video function to send back messages, and to receive messages, from the rest of his cell. Operative "A" also has a Google Maps Twitter Mash Up of where he is under a code word for other members of his cell (if they need more in-depth directions) posted on the WWW that can be viewed from their mobiles. Other members of his cell receive near real time updates (similar to the movement updates that were sent by activists at the RNC) on how, where, and the number of troops that are moving in order to conduct an ambush.

Scenario 2: Terrorist operative "A" has a mobile phone for Tweet messaging and for taking images. Operative "A" also has a separate mobile phone that is actually an explosive device and/or a suicide vest for remote detonation. Terrorist operative "B" has the detonator and a mobile to view "A's" Tweets and images. This may allow "B" to select the precise moment of remote detonation based on near real time movement and imagery that is being sent by "A."

Scenario 3: Cyber Terrorist operative "A" finds U.S. [soldier] Smith's Twitter account. Operative "A" joins Smith's Tweets and begins to elicit information from Smith. This information is then used for a targeting package (targeting in this sense could be identity theft, hacking, and/or physical.) This scenario is not new and has already been discussed for other social networking sites, such as My Space and/or Face Book.

However, the overview notes that the research used to generate the report was gathered from open source intelligence and not compared with information in classified venues.

Steven Musil is the night news editor at CNET News. Before joining CNET News in 2000, Steven spent 10 years at various Bay Area newspapers.E-mail Steven.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
Rhonda J Mangus
Rhonda J Mangus
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 16:55 on October 28th, 2008

Maireid Sullivan, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Terri Potratz
Terri Potratz
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 17:05 on October 28th, 2008

Maireid Sullivan, I like this story. It's good stuff.


markmayhew
markmayhew
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 08:54 on November 2nd, 2008

Maireid Sullivan, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
Maireid Sullivan

Thank yo for the flag, Rhonda.

0
Maireid Sullivan

Thanks for the flag, Terri.

0
Maireid Sullivan

Thank you for the flag, Mark.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from