NP Rank:
US spells out Fannie-Freddie backstop plan
How is that the government can extend unlimited credit to prop up financial institutions but can't extend enough credit to keep people in their homes. Given the role predatory lending played in creating the current credit crisis, how is it that the very institutions who have created the problem are being rewarded for their behaviour, while ordinary citizens are being thrown out of their homes.
If the Fed and Treasury can find billions in credit and what amounts to a guarantee of debt (through a temporary authority of the Treasury to purchase equity) but they can't provide the same security to homeowner? If they did the economy would be in much better shape than it is. You can glean a hint from the the network map presented here (courtesy of Silobreaker).
Here is the full statement from Treasury:
Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson, Jr. issued the following statement:
"Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac play a central role in our housing finance system and must continue to do so in their current form as shareholder-owned companies. Their support for the housing market is particularly important as we work through the current housing correction.
GSE debt is held by financial institutions around the world. Its continued strength is important to maintaining confidence and stability in our financial system and our financial markets. Therefore we must take steps to address the current situation as we move to a stronger regulatory structure.
In recent days, I have consulted with the Federal Reserve, OFHEO, the SEC, Congressional leaders of both parties and with the two companies to develop a three-part plan for immediate action. The President has asked me to work with Congress to act on this plan immediately.
First, as a liquidity backstop, the plan includes a temporary increase in the line of credit the GSEs have with Treasury. Treasury would determine the terms and conditions for accessing the line of credit and the amount to be drawn.
Second, to ensure the GSEs have access to sufficient capital to continue to serve their mission, the plan includes temporary authority for Treasury to purchase equity in either of the two GSEs if needed.
Use of either the line of credit or the equity investment would carry terms and conditions necessary to protect the taxpayer.
Third, to protect the financial system from systemic risk going forward, the plan strengthens the GSE regulatory reform legislation currently moving through Congress by giving the Federal Reserve a consultative role in the new GSE regulator’s process for setting capital requirements and other prudential standards.
I look forward to working closely with the Congressional leaders to enact this legislation as soon as possible, as one complete package."
The Federal Reserve and the U.S. Treasury announced steps Sunday to shore up mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, whose shares have plunged as losses from their mortgage holdings threatened their financial survival.
The Federal Reserve said it granted the Federal Reserve Bank of New York authority to lend to the two companies "should such lending prove necessary." If the companies did borrow directly from the Fed, they would pay 2.25 percent -- the same rate given to commercial banks and Big Wall Street firms.
Secretary Henry Paulson said the Treasury is seeking authority to expand its current line of credit to the two companies should they need to tap it and to make an equity investment in the companies -- if needed. Such moves will require congressional approval
News Tools
July 13, 2008 at 06:19 pm by kferaday, 250 views, 5 comments




Add a comment
Comments (5)
at 18:27 on July 13th, 2008
I found the following analysis very useful. Maybe it can address some of the questions you raise in your opening paragraphs.
Source: prospect.org
at 18:43 on July 13th, 2008
I agree that if Freddie and Fannie failed the housing market would likely crash. Their failure to build up anywhere near adquate capital reserves is a failure of their management. It also doesn't reflect well on the Fed which should have put in a regulatory framework that is at least as rigorous as Basel.
The Fed and Treasury bailout of Fannie and Freddie and the investment banks, while necessary, doesn't absolve them from holding those responsible to account. Nor does it absolve them from their refusal to provide the same broad liquidity support to homeowners.
at 00:37 on July 14th, 2008
kferaday, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 00:42 on July 14th, 2008
kferaday, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 23:25 on July 18th, 2008
A look at The Big Picture: