US starts sending out tax rebates

by Rachel Nixon | April 28, 2008 at 08:18 am
745 views | 5 Recommendations | 5 comments

Photos

i hope this really happens

i hope this really happens

see larger image

uploaded by elizabethfrances

The US government has started sending out tax rebates to consumers worth more than $100 billion - as part of a wider economic stimulus plan.

"Starting Monday, the effects of the stimulus will begin to reach millions of households across our country," Bush said Friday in remarks on the South Lawn of the White House.

Those first rebates will be directly deposited into people's bank accounts. The Internal Revenue Service had been saying direct deposits wouldn't start until next Friday. Bush said paper checks would begin going out on May 9, a week earlier than previously announced.

"The money is going to help Americans offset the high prices we're seeing at the gas pump, the grocery store, and also give our economy a boost to help us pull out of this economic slowdown," Bush said.

Democrats said they were glad the rebate checks were about to go out, but suggested that multinational oil companies were not among the businesses the stimulus package was originally designed to help.

Bush's emphasis on fuel and food prices differed from other comments he's made since signing the economic stimulus legislation, intended to aid the economy by boosting overall consumer spending — which accounts for roughly two-thirds of the nation's economic activity.

Bush has suggested the rebates could trigger a spending spree. "When the money reaches the American people, we expect they will use it to boost consumer spending," he said last month.

By saying expressly that people could use these one-time checks to pay for such necessities as food and gas, Bush underscored the deepening challenges facing the economy.


CNN has details on who is eligible for the rebate - and how to receive it.

One-time payments will be sent to at least 117 million low- and middle-income households, 20 million senior citizens living off of Social Security and 250,000 disabled veterans.

To be eligible for a full rebate, single tax filers must have 2007 adjusted gross income (AGI) below $75,000 and joint filers must have AGI below $150,000.

Single filers with AGI below $75,000 will get rebates of as much as $600. Couples with AGI below $150,000 will receive rebates of up to $1,200.

In addition, parents will also receive $300 per child under 17; there is no cap on the number of qualifying children eligible.

Tax filers who do not owe income taxes, but have at least $3,000 in income - which can include Social Security and disability payments - will get $300 rebates per person or $600 per couple.

The stimulus allows for a 5% phaseout rate for households above the income caps of $75,000 for single filers and $150,000 for joint filers. The rebates of those taxpayers will be reduced by the amount of income above the cap multiplied by 5%.


In the meantime, retailers have got their eyes on consumers' extra cash and are offering rewards for rebates.

Staples used promotions to urge small business owners to spend their rebates. Until May 4, it was offering $50 off purchases of $500 or more.

Home Depot urged customers to use rebates to invest in the environment and cut energy bills, offering discounts through July on compact fluorescent light bulbs and Energy Star appliances.

Wal-Mart and Best Buy also had plans in the works in hopes of getting people to spend their rebates.


Have you received a rebate? If so - will you be spending or saving?

recommend This comment thread is now closed
Rhonda J Mangus
Rhonda J Mangus
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 11:02 on April 28th, 2008

Rachel Nixon - it will be interesting to see if the economic stimulus plan will in fact stimulate the US economy.

0
Rachel Nixon

For sure. I went to a very interesting debate a couple of weeks back at which high powered US economic advisers from both left and right seemed to agree that it would not really help matters.

What are your thoughts, Rhonda?

0
Rhonda J Mangus

Hi Rachel - I agree for the reason that the stimulus can not be maintained over time if it is in fact the case that people do not have money to spend and are only spending because they are receiving this money.  This spending 'spree'  then gives a temporary (and false) appearance of a stimulated economy yet, in reality, the problem of a declining US economy continues. 

0
Rachel Nixon

I agree. I fear it's just papering over the cracks.

0
elizabeth_a_terrell

Rachel, glad I could contribute the photo; thanks for asking. It originally appeared on the National Taxpayers Union's blog, GovermentBYTES!, http://www.governmentbytes.com, and we have been covering the stimulus story on  as you will see from mentions of the word stimulus on our blog :http://tinyurl.com/446lsh .

I actually had the opportunity to talk to Cognressman Garrett today in a blogger meeting here in DC and in discussing the stimulus bill that produced these checks. He specifically stated it was a, "'rebate' with no 'bate.'"  It was a redistribution of income.  Will this fuel the economy to some extent, sure-  lower economic classes are more likely to have incurred debt and as such have a higher coefficient of consumption on income. 

However, if that money had remained in its current income earners hands or even within the corporations for reinvestment we might have seen a much larger stimulation and at the same time a solidification of business's standing which are located in the United States.  I urge you to consider the nature of multipliers:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&ct=res&cd=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fbooks.google.com%2Fbooks%3Fid%3D1RuA4wU2BnsC%26pg%3DPA93%26lpg%3DPA93%26dq%3D%2522investment%2Bmultiplier%2522%2B%2522consumption%2Bmultiplier%2522%2Bus%26source%3Dweb%26ots%3DswjECm1fPq%26sig%3DSbH4-pAh-qQ8Q0VNkHS4_rBv3kc%26hl%3Den&ei=f50XSLXbDqLQiAG2orybDw&usg=AFQjCNHFvv1Dp5H919k5al2wyz02TXjttQ&sig2=guA55ICnVbDAiBtndFDf1w

 

Congressman Garrett has introduced a bill HR 5109 http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.05109:

"[The]Economic Growth Act of 2008 - Amends the Internal Revenue Code to: (1) repeal the dollar and other limitations on the expensing allowance of depreciable business assets; (2) reduce to 25% the maximum corporate income tax rate; (3) provide for an inflation adjustment to the basis of certain capital assets for purposes of determining gain or loss; and (4) reduce from 35 to 15% the alternative capital gains tax rate for corporations."

This means that businesses will not have to set aside dormant funds for expensing items for buinsess operations on a quarterly basis, it will expense them immediately. The bill also encourages corporate reinvestment at a taxation level that many eastern bloc countries have adopted and reduces the capital gains rate for corporations to the rate it stands at for individuals.   Additionally, the inflation rate adjustment would be factored into the affect inflation has on businesses so they are not taxed as heavily in light of inflationary periods. All in all, this seems to encourage reinvestment of profits domestically. Corporate entities may pull us out of this mess if we give them the breathing room to do what they do best: make money by employing people.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Rhonda J Mangus
First Flagged at 11:02 AM, Apr 28, 2008 by Rhonda J Mangus
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in Tech & Biz

 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from