What Does it Mean to Have a Sustainable Brand?

by mvellandi | July 31, 2008 at 05:15 pm
309 views | 4 Recommendations | 6 comments

Photos

What Does it Mean to Have a Sustainable Brand?

What Does it Mean to Have a Sustainable Brand?

see larger image

uploaded by mvellandi

A friend of mine, Lewis Green, asked the following question to his readers:

Sustainability is Hot! Are you? What does it mean to have a Sustainable Brand and/or be a green company? Do today's businesses, some of whom are rushing to be labeled green, get it? Is authenticity key or can a company use marketing to get consumers to see they are green?

With some great responses you can read from his post, here is mine:

It means to be both environmentally conscious and be economically minded, through extreme efficiency and a goal of zero waste in operations, manufacturing, marketing, and product development. Setting goals and auditing to meet performance metrics will determine progress.

Authenticity and transparency are important. The degree to which you want to promote it though, will be up to the organization and the circumstances. In many cases, companies are already being responsible in their supply chain or other areas. The point is then to responsibly create an awareness program that at least states the facts, as part of a public relations package on corporate social responsibility. For other firms that are seizing the market opportunity on sustainability, obviously their communications are much stronger on the green/clean message. But their responsibility toward ethical communications remain the same.

But when the product is supposed to be green/sustainable, one must naturally be careful and not claim superfluous attributes that are vague. Perhaps the deep truth is real. In that case, marketing copy, language and graphic design has to be carefully constructed so as not to be critically/vaguely perceived. Third party audits and certifications are helpful, but only to the degree that the third party is recognized and credible. There is literally a fight going on among organizations that want to claim their label as being the best. Much of it is ego-driven, but most of it is about money. The labels with the most recognition and adoption by reputable companies will win. However, the government is the largest purchaser of most goods. It's their actions to really watch under the radar, because although they're slow as dinosaurs, they have a responsibility to the public to be very fair and objective. I'm still talking about product-orientation, everything else is CSR related and another world of its own.

Much of this reminds me of health food marketing. But claims like "99% fat free" (by weight doh!), won't work in the green space because misleading claims are going to be found out about, blogged on, and criticized by others (and the competition).

. . .

What do YOU think?

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
julianw

Interesting comment. Companies greenwashing their image while making no substantive cuts to their pollution is definitely a concern. I hope environmentalism can become popular enough that it'll be a public relations disaster to be accused of greenwashing.


0
mvellandi

Julianw, I hope so too. In browsing the social news networks lately, I've come across video compilations of greenwash advertising. I think it's great that activists on any issue can use social media to express their feelings of either support, discontent, or mere neutral thoughts.

I for example, believe that carbon offsetting is a huge branded sinwashing industry, capitalizing on the fad of 'carbon-reduction' as a trendy notion that an individual/org can feel good about, and exclaim to others through paper certificates and product/website/annual report badges claiming organizational virtuosity. However, since I subscribe to relativism, I know there's some good that can be done through offsetting....it's just that the effect is minimal on the environment (global warming's sources are multi-variate, not simply limited to CO2) considering that time is short. Extreme efficiency and a policy zero waste (or go further and take a 'cradle-to-cradle' philosophy which results in net benefits), are the single best programs to pursue, because not only will they increase resource productivity, but also because they're incredible investments into reducing costs (seen and unseen [the mysterious 'overhead']) and becoming more competitive (being future-oriented).

World_Groove
World_Groove
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 07:46 on August 1st, 2008

 

SOLARLIFE
SOLARLIFE
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 08:27 on August 1st, 2008

mvellandi, thanks for encouraging us "What do YOU think? Well first what is a not sustainable or green product: A laptop computer with good energy rating, but no end of life 95% recycling rate, have a look to the LI-ION battery, recycling? Not green, people who sell you a Eco light bulb, but don't take it back for mercury recycling ( and if they throw it just in the garbidge)

What is sustainable economy? It's the economy for the next generation to survive, with a closed loop materials/recycling managment. Have to invent it now. In sustainable brandnames I don't believe to much; sustainable company management by owners yes.

0
jessica.lam

So much effort is being put into appearing green - resources are wasted in the end...

0
mvellandi

@solarlife - The 'sustainable-ness' of a product has to be scored. Because we're talking about a systems design with multiple parties though, a manufacturer's product can only be graded so far. For disposal of CFLs, there's either the local hazmat disposal facility, or there's IKEA and Home Depot (insert other retailer in case they have a program). Because of this situation, Paul Hawken and other environmentalists have called greater emphasis on products as services to be rented/leased, instead of owned, so that the burden of disposal isn't placed on the user.

@jay.el - yes, many efforts are being wasted. Primarily it's inappropriate image-based advertising and half-ass efforts like carbon offsetting and cause-related marketing. But the effort of appearing green can be good, IF there is substance behind the product's attributes and the company's operations. Investors should know how a company is performing on the CSR front, and from a financial perspective (where benefits may be attained). Secondly, consumers should be able to identify and vote with their dollars, what products provide the value proposition they're looking for AND happen to have green attributes.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from