Who Pwns Ya, Baby? Fighter Jets Vs Kill Switches

by Jordan Yerman | May 1, 2008 at 06:48 am
166 views | 0 Recommendations | 0 comments

Photos

With this chip, Mister Bond, I shall bring your hemisphere down

With this chip, Mister Bond, I shall bring your hemisphere down

see larger image

uploaded by Jordan Yerman

Electronic warfare is no longer the stuff of 007 lore anymore, but an accepted practice. In light of this, how secure is the Pentagon's array of weaponry? To be sure, the chances of a "kill-switch" attack against a  squadron of fighters are pretty remote, but far more likely than someone warping the laws of physics to cause hydrogen peroxide to explode in a water bottle.

Imagine if the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter could be effectively shut down by a foreign adversary with the flip of a switch?

That same basic scenario is cropping up more frequently lately, and not just in the Middle East, where conspiracy theories abound. According to a U.S. defense contractor who spoke on condition of anonymity, a “European chip maker” recently built into its microprocessors a kill switch that could be accessed remotely. French defense contractors have used the chips in military equipment, the contractor told IEEE Spectrum. If in the future the equipment fell into hostile hands, “the French wanted a way to disable that circuit,” he said. Spectrum could not confirm this account independently, but spirited discussion about it among researchers and another defense contractor last summer at a military research conference reveals a lot about the fever dreams plaguing the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD).

Feeding those dreams is the Pentagon's realization that it no longer controls who manufactures the components that go into its increasingly complex systems. A single plane like the DOD's next generation F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, can contain an “insane number” of chips, says one semiconductor expert familiar with that aircraft's design. Estimates from other sources put the total at several hundred to more than a thousand.

While the USA arguably owns the deployment of top-flight war-tech, they definitely do not own the means of production for the brains of those machines, and that is a long-overlooked weakness.

Comments (0)

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from