NP Rank:
Wiki growing pains: mo' money mo' problems
The "free encyclopedia that anyone can edit" is in the midst of an identity crisis. Having evolved far beyond its original, modest vision of collaborative knowledge and free information, it needs to decide what it is, and what to do next.
Although Wikipedia has studiously avoided bowing to commercial interests such as advertising, Ms. Gardner knows the site could easily get rich if it began acting more like a big media company. That is, if it began selling its audience to advertisers. That's 57 million unique users in the U.S. alone last month.
Once an unassuming little website, it is now an Internet powerhouse.
"We hear it all the time: you're leaving billions on the table," she said. "It's hard for people to understand."
Such a change could make Wikipedia worth billions, and make the recent $1.8-billion (U.S.) purchase of online news pioneer CNet by CBS Corp. look like chump change.
But advertising is out of the question, since the site is backed by a charity. So the problem for Ms. Gardner is how to harness Wikipedia's potential in order to sustain the foundation's growing costs - new servers, more staff, new technology - without straying from the notion of Wikipedia as a not-for-profit. The organization needs less than $6-million a year, with most coming from fans who donate between $25 and $500,000 - but it wants to grow.
"A lot of things have been discussed like board games and TV shows. And I'm not ruling that out," Mr. Wadhwa said. "But what we'd really like to do is focus on things that are more directly associated with our mission."
While the debate between business interests and non-profit independence is often black and white for Wikipedia, the Bertelsmann deal, struck before Mr. Wadhwa arrived, is an example of an acceptable venture that exists in the grey area between those two categories, he said. That's the message Mr. Wadhwa is taking to companies. "We're actually open to suggestions that can be bounced back and forth."
Wikipedia is allowing others to help write its strategy - a familiar approach. "Our business plan is like a wiki. That's a good way of putting it," Mr. Wadhwa said.
By the numbers
8,000
The percentage amount
by which Web traffic has
grown in the past five years.
11.2 million
The number of unique visitors
in Canada in March, ranking it
6th in traffic with half that
of top-ranked Google.
17 minutes, 51 seconds
The average time spent by U.S. visitors to the site in April
Source: Nielsen Co.,
comScore.com
Crowd Power
-
Zeitfixierer
Schönebeck (Elbe), Sachsen-Anhalt, Germany -
jerryfletcher
budapest, Germany -
jeffhester
Aliso Viejo, California, United States -
Miro-Foto
Foothill Ranch, California, United States -
Another Hue
Ireland -
iamthemikeb
Oakland, California, United States -
AtariGracinhaMarco
Newport News, Virginia, United States -
celina.uemura
Japan -
Siim Teller
Estonia -
Nicolas Perriault
France -
jmerelo
Palmerton, Pennsylvania, United States -
petantik
United Kingdom -
jvoss
Germany -
yhassy
Japan -
zwanzig
Littleton, Colorado, United States -
nswlearnscope
Australia















Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (5)
at 19:45 on May 26th, 2008
Rob Peters, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 02:18 on May 27th, 2008
I would not object to Wikimedia including ads for financing. I think there is a grey area between a non-profit backed by charity and a big media conglomerate that steps over dead bodies. There are not just these two extremes. Wikimedia could create a special policy that states that advertising customers have no right whatsoever to interfere with what's published on Wikimedia sites. Ads could be included on a random basis to make sure that ad placement cannot put pressure on the content.
I know this would be a very difficult change that a lot of people would disagree with, but I think it's feasible.
at 02:52 on May 27th, 2008
Rob Peters, I like this story. It's good stuff.
maybe wiki should invite all the N.G.Os who are doing charity work to device a formula.
at 04:44 on May 27th, 2008
iamthemikeb has contributed a photo to this story.
at 16:55 on May 28th, 2008
My colleague captured this last year after our page to capture the national LearnScope project was deleted. LearnScope was a not for profit government funded project for the upskilling of teachers in e-learning. It was a project worth sharing and there was no advertising or financial gain from the site.
nswlearnscope has contributed a photo to this story.