NP Rank:
YouTube announces ban on violent videos
After dithering for long popular video sharing website YouTube has decided to control objectionable video content that “incites other to violence.” The decision came after some US Senator have been demanding content control on the YouTube site. There are many terrorist-affiliated videos on the site, many of which even had Al Qaeda logos stamped in the corners and that led to the increase in the demand to remove the clips.
YouTube as a policy of not pre-screening any videos but have a user flagging system to mark out any inappropriate submissions.
YouTube has moved to ban videos that incite violence following criticism in the UK and US that it needed to toughen its policies.
Google-owned YouTube has updated its community guidelines - specifically pointing out that a new addition is to make sure no videos "directly incite violence".
"We realise it's not always obvious where we draw the line on content that's acceptable to upload," said YouTube in a blog post.
"We've updated the community guidelines… included in the update are a few new things to steer clear of, like not directly inciting violence."
Within YouTube's community guidelines section, the updated rules include two points on violent videos.
"Graphic or gratuitous violence is not allowed," points out one guideline. "If your video shows someone getting hurt, attacked or humiliated, don't post it."
The second relevant guideline highlighted as a "common sense rule" relates to hate speech.
"We encourage free speech and defend everyone's right to express unpopular points of view," states the rule.
"We do not permit hate speech (speech which attacks or demeans a group based on race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, gender, age, veteran status and sexual orientation/gender identity)."
YouTube was taken to task in the UK in July over its policing of the "dark side" of the internet by a culture, media and sport committee report looking at harmful content on the internet.
In a press briefing on the topic, committee chairman John Whittingdale criticised YouTube for not going far enough with proactive measures, beyond a pledge to take down material when it is "flagged" up by users.
He cited one specific example of "concern" that involved a video of what appeared to be a gang rape that was viewed around 600 times.
He said that YouTube was made aware of the content by a user but it was not taken down until a second warning came through.
Crowd Power
-
Sanjay Jha
New Delhi, India





Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (3)
at 00:32 on September 15th, 2008
thats great news mr sanjay, this will help children in a long way,violence in any form virtual or real should be discouraged.
at 00:48 on September 15th, 2008
Sanjay Jha, I like this story. It's good stuff.
I am all in favour of that ban.
at 03:33 on September 15th, 2008
They also need to ban videos that incite crime. I have seen videos of kids chucking stuff on railway lines. I contacted my MP and he more or less, said his hands were tied and said our Government wasn't as tough on them. I think Youtube needs to go much further, although no doubt other sites, will continue to use them.