Terror List for Iran Guards

by phrolen | August 15, 2007 at 08:16 am
386 views | 4 Recommendations | 1 comment

Photos

Terror List for Iran Guards

Terror List for Iran Guards

see larger image

uploaded by phrolen

    The United States seems to be one step closer to a face-off with the radical theocratic governing regime in Iran. Recent indications have shown Tehran playing an active role in anti-American efforts on the battlefields, and it appears that the Bush administration is losing patience.

During his news conference on Thursday, President Bush addressed the Iranian people directly. “My message to the Iranian people is, ‘You can do better than this current government,’ ” Mr. Bush said. “ ‘You don’t have to be isolated. You don’t have to be in a position where you can’t realize your full economic potential.’ ”

In that same news conference Bush also seemed to signal a change in battlefield tactics which would take a much tougher stance against Iranian meddling in Iraq;

President Bush seemed to signal a tougher approach to Iran last week when he called attention to what American officials have said was an active role by the Revolutionary Guard in providing munitions, training and other support to Shiite militants who have been attacking American troops in Iraq. “When we catch you playing a nonconstructive role, there will be a price to pay,” Mr. Bush said of Iran during a news conference on Thursday

Administration warhawks seem to be winning points with the president lately calling for a much tougher stance regarding Tehran and many, including the office of Vice President Dick Cheney, calling for perhaps military strikes. The latest administration moves seem to signal that it is ready to place Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps, Iran's largest military wing, on the U.S. International Terror Watchlist. Such a move would mark the first time a governmental entity had been placed on the list.

According to European diplomats, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has warned of the move in recent conversations with European counterparts, saying that a delay in efforts to win approval from the United Nations Security Council for further economic sanctions on Iran was leaving the administration with little choice but unilateral action.

 
A move toward putting the Revolutionary Guard on the foreign terrorist list would serve at least two purposes for Ms. Rice: to pacify, for a while, administration hawks who are pushing for possible military action, and to further press America’s allies to ratchet up sanctions against Iran in the Security Council.



Senior administration officials said current plans called for the declaration to be made this month, but cautioned that it could be put off, and that the effort could still be set aside if the Security Council moved more quickly to impose broad sanctions on Iran over its nuclear program.

 
The officials said the declaration was being pushed by Ms. Rice, and would not say if it had been endorsed by the National Security Council or the Pentagon.

All indications seem to point to active anti-U.S. operations in both Iraq and Afghanistan with large volumes of weapons, originating from Iran, reaching the hands  of forces opposed to coalition efforts.



In June, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said the volume of weapons reaching the Taliban from Iran made it “difficult to believe” that the shipments were “taking place without the knowledge of the Iranian government.” In a television interview the same day, Assistant Secretary of State R. Nicholas Burns said there was “irrefutable evidence” that the weapons were coming from the Revolutionary Guard.

The decisions, if made, would mark decisive change in American handling of the Iranian problem and might signal an overarching shift away from a seemingly failed diplomatic policy and put coalition forces on the fast track for imminent confrontation with the Revolutionary Gaurds.


 

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
ryan
ryan
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 08:24 on August 15th, 2007

phrolen, thanks for the added context and insight. as i mentioned in my comment here, the designation of Iran as a terrorist group is huge shift in strategy - fighting a unified army of over 100,000 is very different than fighting insurgents roaming the streets of Baghdad so I wonder how this shift in policy will affect actions on the ground.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from