Terror War, Case Haneef: Is Australia Still A Democracy?

by Daniel Neun | July 16, 2007 at 05:36 am
456 views | 0 Recommendations | 0 comments

Photos

Kevin Andrews, Australian Immigration Minister.

Kevin Andrews, Australian Immigration Minister.

see larger image

uploaded by Daniel Neun

Brisbane: In spite of a court´s decision the executive branch in
Australia keeps Dr. Mohammed Haneef still in prison, without proof of
anything but being a muslim.

It´s holding him because of a failed "character test" by the
Australian Government. It can do so, because in Australia the
government can withdraw a person's visa if the immigration minister
"judges" a person is not of "good character".

And that´s why Dr.Haneef is violating immigration laws.



Is that a joke?





A GUILTY MUSLIM IS A MUSLIM - AN INNOCENT MUSLIM IS A CLEVER MUSLIM



Mohammed Haneef, 27, who practiced at a hospital in Queensland state, was detained on July 2 at Brisbane International Airport.

He just wanted to see his sick little daughter and his wife, who had
been given birth to her a few days before, his Mum told the press in
Bangalore, India, on July 4.



Dr. Haneef worked at the Halton Hospital in Runcorn, northern England, until 2005.

He got arrested for being a terrorist and involvement in the alleged
"terror attacks" in London and Glasgow on Juni 29/30 - in 2007.

A bunch of allegedly dangerous doctors - who parked their dangerous
cars under a "no waiting" sign in London and also rammed a garbage can
in front of the club "Tiger Tiger" they would try to blow up - were
known to the MI5
.

This club (!) received a 53-page document from police warning them
about vehicle-borne explosives only a few days before the attack, which
was even predicted on a website just hours before it happened. (2)



According to media reports US-intelligence warned of airport attacks in
Glasgow, but the information allegedly was not passed on to British
officials, officials said.

Nevertheless, George Bush praised Mr. Brown's "strong response" to the attacks.



Though the Royal British Prime Minister, "Mr." Gordon Brown,
immediately tried to enforce new "security" bills, Scotland's first
minister Alex Salmond said there was nothing in the current
investigation that supported arguments that the law should be changed
from 28 to 90 days' detention for "terror suspects".



Chief constable Colin McKerracher of Grampian police, the president of
the Association of Chief Police Officers in Scotland, said after the
"attacks" he was confident police had "everything we need" in the
current investigation in terms of terror legislation.

Tony Blair in the end got thrown out of Downing Street because he tried this "terror legislation" in 2005. (2)



"I reasonably suspect that he has, or has had, an association with
persons engaged in criminal activity, namely terrorism, in the U.K.,"
the Australian Immigration Minister Kevin Andrews said to this.



Who cares about a minister who suspects anything about anybody? Been down there under something?





"THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE HELPLESS" OR "JUST MURPHY´S LAW"?



Cameron Murphy, secretary of the Australian Council for Civil
Liberties, remarked the government was undermining judicial
independence.



"The reason we have an independent court system is so these incredibly
important decisions are made for the right reasons, and aren't subject
to political interference," Murphy said.

"It is not appropriate for the government to just keep him incarcerated
because they don't like the decision of the magistrates court."(1)



So, Cameron, would you please tell an interested worldwide Court of Public Opinion what you are going to do about this?


Advertisement

Comments (0)

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from