"Terrorists" or "freedom fighters?"

by ngungun | July 14, 2007 at 04:16 pm
377 views | 2 Recommendations | 3 comments

HERE in Australia some of us have decided to join Gordon Brown in the UK by not using the phrase “war on terror” any more. It is a small step, but it might be important. From now on “terrorists” will be identified more accurately “freedom fighters.”

The past fortnight has seen our useless media caught up in another hysterical episode as our Federal Police Force got their hands on a young India-born doctor, who left London last year to come and work in Australia. Before he left he handed over his SIM card to his cousin because it had unused  credit which would be no use to him in the far-away antipodes.

After a week of solitary incarceration, during which the police wrecked his home searching for evidence, and then several hours of intense questioning beginning at three o'clock in the morning  Dr Mohamed Haneef made a startling admission: He had not asked his cousin if he was a “terrorist” before handing over his phone card.

Haneef's cousin is one of the two freedom fighters who tried to blow up Glasgow Airport at the end of last month, in a failed  exercise that seems almost comical. The car they used, a Jeep Cherokee which they presumably had loaded with considerable explosive material, caught fire and was engulfed in flames yet even then failed to explode.

Now Haneef has been charged in Australia under Section 102.7 (2) of the Crimes Act of 1995. Clearly the evidence gained so far has been insufficient to charge him under the Anti-Terrorist Act of 2004, even though he was detained under that Act and held incommunicado for a week.

The charge reads that police allege that he  “provided support to a terrorist organisation by recklessly giving them a SIM card,” and the maximum penalty is fifteen years jail.

Federal Police Commissioner Mick Keelty told reporters that the specific allegation involved “recklessness” rather than “intention.” He said, "The allegation being that he was reckless about some of the support he provided to that group, in particular the provision of his SIM card for the use of the group."

As the tired, unshaven, manacled Haneef  appeared before the court, encased in a bullet-proof glass cage in clothes he had been wearing for a week, it was difficult not to feel some sympathy for him. He has a wife and new-born baby in India and had been allowed to talk to his wife on the telephone for just 60-seconds top tell her what has happened to him. In the meantime, his landlord is about to evict him and his possessions from his flat for unpaid rent.

In the meantime, the incident does nothing for thousands of patients around Australia awaiting treatment and surgery.  In its obsession with returning budget surpluses for the past eleven years, the Howard government has failed in its duty of care towards the people of this nation by failing to provide for the education of enough home-grown doctors to care for them.

The result has been a frantic campaign to recruit overseas doctors to come here to work under a special visa.  After this incident, I would have to advise them not to. You'd never know when or whether you'd be locked up as a freedom fighter, especially if you happened to be black.

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
pierre pouliquin
pierre pouliquin
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 23:21 on July 15th, 2007

ngungun, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
ngungun

A new development to this story is that a Brisbane magistrate has decided that Dr Haneel should be released from custody on a $10,000 surety, must report to the police three times a week and surrender his passport, surely a more than reasonable decision given the flimsy basis for his being charged at all.  But there is an election looming in Australia and our Federal Governmnent, facing a landslide defeat, has decided that Mr Haneef may be their saviour if they show how tough they are on people who want their freedom (not that Mr Haneef has been shown to be a freedom fighter at all, just a decent young doctor trying to make a living). The government has cancelled the temporary work visa on which he came to Australia at our invitation, and is to take him into immediate detention at the Villawood detention centre in New South Wales and effectively they will throw away the key. For he will remain in detention at the pleasure of the Immigration Minister. He will be separated from his legal support in Queensland. He will be allowed out only for his trial, which is likely to be many months, even years away. It is a vicious, self-serving government decision made at cabinet level to override the justice system and it makes me ashamed to be an Australian under the ruthless totalitarian rule of John Winston Howard.

0
pierre pouliquin

Last subtile touch about "presumption of innocence", "fair go", etc....The minister for immigration said....he will be expulsed from Australia after the trial....whatever the result of the trial....

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from