AUSTIN, TEXAS -- Texas' love affair with guns got a shot in the arm last week when Governor Rick Perry signed into law House Bill 308, expanding the rights of blind game hunters to include the use of laser sighting devices to slaughter their prey. The Bill was sponsored by Representative Edmund Kuempel and passed both houses of the legislature unanimously. In fact, during both the House and Senate hearings on the "blind hunter bill," there was no opposition.
Testifying in favor of allowing visually impaired hunters to use laser sighting devices were representatives from the Exotic Wildlife Association, the Texas State Rifle Association and the Coalition of Texans with Disabilities.
Until now, laser sighting devices and the use of lights has been expressly prohibited in the Texas Parks and Wildlife Hunting Code because the use of such equipment serves to stun the stalked game and gives an unfair advantage to the hunter.
Representative Edmund Kuempel issued the following statement on numerous occasions: "This opens up the fun of hunting to additional people, and I think that's great. I've seen this on TV before, when they're (blind people) taking target practice."
Apparently, Texas has now adopted television as a role model for legislation.
According to the Bill Analysis included in the official record, a blind hunter must be "assisted by a person who is not legally blind, has a hunting license, and is at least 13 years of age."
Additionally, the law requires the legally blind hunter to carry proof of being legally blind, but fails to specify exactly what constitutes "proof." While the new law became effective immediately upon Governor Rick Perry's signature on June 15, the Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission has until January 1, 2008 to adopt rules prescribing what is "acceptable proof" of blindness. Until that rule is adopted, violations of the new law cannot be enforced.
All hunters in Texas born on or after September 2, 1971 and who are 17 years old or older must pass an exam to become certified to hunt in this state. The
Hunter Education Course is available online, as a home-study curriculum, or at various specified locations around the state.
Texas law requires that any computer service offered by the state must be accessible to disabled Texas residents, including the legally blind. The
Hunter Education Course is no different than any other internet-based web site and, unless the blind person owns a device such as a speech synthesizer, the course does not comply with Texas statutes regarding disabilities.
Another factor not considered in the hasty adoption of the "blind hunter" law is the problem of transportation to the hunting lease. A 13 or 14 year old certainly can't drive and, of course, the visually impaired individual can't either. Or can s/he?
According to Chapter 504.201 (2) of the Texas Transportation Code, a legally blind person can apply for a "specialty license plate" and receive that license plate if the application is "accompanied by evidence satisfactory to the department that the applicant or the applicant's vehicle is eligible, and (t)he statement must certify that the person making the application . . . is legally blind or has a mobility problem. . ."
Chapter 681.003 of the Code allows a legally blind person to obtain a "Handicapped" placard.
And, finally, Chapter 522.0235 of the Texas Transportation Code provides for application for a "waiver of the visual standards for a commercial driver's license" if the applicant has had no moving violations during the past three years and agrees to drive only in the State of Texas.
So, listen up, all of you blind Texas hunters. Order a laser sighting device for your rifle; get that special license plate, a handicapped placard, and a commercial driver's license with a waiver for visual impairment. Grab a 13 year old and go kill that deer . . . or tree . . . farmer's cow . . . the farmer? . . . the 13 year old?
Oh well, as Harry Whittington said when Dick Cheney shot him in the face, "It was an accident, just an accident."
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (11)
at 15:06 on June 22nd, 2007
Absolutely loved this story, Anita! Who says Texas isn't a progressive state?
at 15:47 on June 22nd, 2007
Anita when you first told us about this story you were working on, I was very keen on reading it - and you have paid off on it admirably.
First of all, the thoroughness of your research is brilliant..it's all well-written, well-argued, and then punctuated with a delightful stiletto thrust at the end.
"Grab a 13 year old and go kill that deer . . . or tree . . . farmer's cow . . . the farmer? . . . the 13 year old?"
Totally wonderful.
at 15:53 on June 22nd, 2007
Thanks so much. I take your comments to heart.
at 15:51 on June 22nd, 2007
Great work, Anita. This is an amazing story...the kind of thing that makes you laugh and cry simultaneously. Horrendous. Thank you so much for all of your hard work.
at 15:54 on June 22nd, 2007
Thanks, Kaitlin. I think I'll stay away from hunting areas.
at 18:19 on June 22nd, 2007
This gives new meaning to "drive-by shooting"
at 08:23 on June 23rd, 2007
Anita, I really wish that this was a joke; your photo says it all.
Ne'er mind political correctness or equal access: people who cannot see should not be carrying guns, nor should they be driving! You'd think that this would be common sense, but evidently not. Also, on a practical level, I don't understand how a laser sight will help someone who is blind (or nearly blind) to hit a target-- surely they won't be able to see the point of light at anything beyond point-blank range.
As for hunting with a partner, "a little to the left" is pretty meaningless when trying to hit something with a rifle whilst not being able to see.
My favorite quote is "Until now, laser sighting devices and the use of lights has been
expressly prohibited in the Texas Parks and Wildlife Hunting Code
because the use of such equipment serves to stun the stalked game and
gives an unfair advantage to the hunter." I would think that having a gun is a pretty huge advantage for the hunter, too!
Excellent article, and, as ANG says, well worth the wait.
at 08:28 on June 23rd, 2007
Anita Porterfield, this is good stuff, thanks for keeping your eyes open and reporting this!
at 11:10 on October 8th, 2007
Anita Porterfield, a little research on your part would turn up the fact that blind hunting has nothing to do with blind people. Just as window blinds cover your windows and restrict your view, hunting blinds cover the hunter, restricting the view of whatever is being hunted from seeing the hunter.
The are talking about a type of hunting called blind hunting. So "blind game hunters" are hunters participating in the kind of hunting that utilizes blinds.
Don't let your bias continue to blind your reporting.
at 09:49 on October 11th, 2007
mark5534,
i think you should examine the actual bill which clearly states that it is referring to legally blind inviduals.
See excerpt below:
See here .
at 10:29 on November 16th, 2007
Unfortunatly, this bill became the butt of many jokes because of a lack of understanding regarding disabilities and defenitions.
There is a difference between "blind" and "legally blind". A "blind" person cannot see. A "legally blind" person often can. Here is the Federal definition of "Legally Blind", as provided by the National Federation for the Blind:
[T]he term "blindness" means central visual acuity of 20/200 or less in the better eye with the use of a correcting lens. An eye which is accompanied by a limitation in the fields of vision such that the widest diameter of the visual field subtends an angle no greater than 20 degrees shall be considered for purposes in this paragraph as having a central visual acuity of 20/200 or less.
42 U.S.C. § 416(i)(1)(B) (Supp. IV 1986).[1]
("An eye which is accompanied by a limitation in the fields of vision such that the widest diameter of the visual field subtends an angle no greater than 20 degrees shall be considered for purposes in this paragraph as having a central visual acuity of 20/200 or less." is the government's way of saying you can say that the 20 degree vield of vision is the same thing as 20/200 or less even if the forward vision is in reality better than that. Don't argue the semantics, it's the law.)
This means a person who has perfect vision straight ahead but has tunnel vision is considered "Legally Blind". A normal visual field is around 180 degrees. What this means is that a person with normal vision might catch something coming at him from the side with their peripheral vision. Picture yourself standing on a clock dial, facing 12:00. Normal vision would let you see things coming at you from an area between 9:00 and 3:00 (some people have a slightly greater or smaller field of vision.) A person meeting this criteria for being "Legally Blind" would only see things between about 11:00 and 1:00, like having blinders on.
My granddaughter is considered "Legally Blind" but has 20/20 vision straight ahead.
This purpose of this bill is not necessarly allow people who cannot see to hunt. It is to allow people who very likely can see but meet the definition of "Legally Blind" to use a laser sight.
I can't imaging a person who has no vision wanting to hunt unless it is perhaps a person who has been a hunter and is losing their vision, not wanting to completely give-up that part of their life. I think of my friend's father who was dying and wanted to get one last deer...