The burden of proof falls reasonably upon whom?

by ched macquigg | December 24, 2006 at 11:48 am
225 views | 0 Recommendations | 0 comments


I aver; the leadership of the APS offers no opportunity to be held
accountable for their character or their competence. And further, that
that is proof of mal, mis, and non feasance as public servants; and as
role models for 98,000 of our sons and daughters.
Am I to prove the negative? Am I to produce every sheet of paper that
they have printed, to show than not one has on it a system that offers
a principled resolution of a complaint made against them? And further
that not one of those sheets of paper shows a record of honest
accountability to even the student standard of conduct?
Or is the burden of proof upon them to produce that one sheet of paper?
What do I have to do to get them to surrender it? I have been asking
for it for fourteen years. I have asked the newspapers to ask to see
that proof; or report that it does not exist. I have taken them to
court. I have run for the board.
Beyond any reasonable doubt, there is no record that proves honest
accountability to any meaningful standard of conduct.
Incontrovertibly established by self evidence; voters have a right to
know the truth while there is time enough to participate meaningfully
in the decisions that must soon be made.
Diogenes’six

Advertisement

Comments (0)

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from