NP Rank:
The marriage industrial complex
If you've been to a wedding in the past few years (or
have staged one yourself), you won't be surprised to learn that weddings
are a booming business. Last year, the average American ceremony cost
$27,852; the average dress, $1,025. If such figures don't shock you
(and keep in mind, the numbers are far higher in pricey cities such as
New York and San Francisco), maybe a few comparisons will: The median
household income in the United States is $46,326 and a 5 percent down
payment on a $500,000 condominium is $25,000.Even more disturbing, perhaps, is how quickly and effortlessly the
$161 billion wedding industry seems to have insinuated itself into
every corner of the culture -- and how impossible it has become to
escape its trappings, from diamond rings (which, before the 1930s, were
not a de facto wedding accouterment) to wedding planners, bridal
registries and glossy magazines that perpetuate weddings as fairy-tale
fantasies. In fact, the extravagant, over-the-top gala has become such
a fixture of American life that most people don't question it anymore.
And why should they? If marriage is supposed to be a sacred undertaking
that happens once in a lifetime, why shouldn't you do it wearing Vera
Wang?"At the beginning of "One Perfect Day" you point out that
marriage used to signal that you were becoming an adult or herald the
start of your sex life as well as your departure from the family home.
Now that we do all of these things before marriage, do you think it's
the extravagant ceremony itself that has become the rite of passage?Precisely. It's amazing the number of people who say, "If we can
get through this, we can get through anything," or "This is the first
challenge of our married life together." And you think, "Jeez, you have
no idea what you've got coming!" It's not like it's a death in the
family or anything like that.This is sort of a psychoanalytic argument, but I think that people need for a wedding to feel traumatic. Because it used to be
a traumatic transition. You left your parental home. If you look at
documents -- diaries or letters from women in 19th century rural
America getting married -- leaving their mother was a very, very big
deal. Wrenching away from your birth family was a very big deal. Now,
most of us have done that years earlier. And to some degree, even those
people who are living at home are still leading more independent lives.But I think that people still need to feel that this transition is
a viscerally affecting experience. Because being married is very
different from not being married. I don't mean that if you get married
tomorrow, suddenly your life is going to be different the next day. But
it is a different commitment, as anybody who is going through a divorce
will tell you. It's much harder to break up a marriage than it is to
break up a nonmarital partnership. So I think people need the sense of
"Wow! Something really big has just happened.""The purpose of honeymoons has evolved in a similar way, hasn't
it? You point out that they used to be a chance to visit the bride's
relatives and friends, and then they were all about sexual intimacy ...
Yeah, and now, if you talk to any couples or look on the Knot.com,
you see that people perceive the honeymoon as a time when they can
recover from the stress of planning the wedding!"
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
-
egoigwe
Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (16)
at 08:13 on May 21st, 2007
$100 for the license and a bucket of KFC I say... who says romance is dead? -> Good stuff.
at 08:37 on May 21st, 2007
Way to go ... with a most distinguished Col Sanders as best man! I'm drinking to that already ... bottoms up, kind Sir!
Ego
at 06:56 on May 22nd, 2007
One should never confuse romance with Marriage.
at 07:25 on May 21st, 2007
For those just tuning in, this ties in nicely with Ego's post from this past weekend. As for the diamonds that adorn the ring, that's a whole other story!
at 08:32 on May 21st, 2007
Let me tell you a little story J. My friend Wolfgang lives in Sweden with his very pretty wife and he spent all of $3000 getting her wedding ring. Now, at the time Wolfie was just settling in and still jockeying around for some form of stable income. Jason, Wolfie's brother-in-law and a successful stock player, got married to his second wife two years later and liking Kimberley's wedding ring figured it would be nice to get something like it for his new bride. So Wolfie took him for a look-see and he ended up getting the same ring as Kimberley's. When he got home and presented it to his bride to be ... wouldn't you know it ... she completely freaked! "You spent only $4000 on my wedding ring?! That's about how much your brother-in-law spent on your sister's ring ... and he didn't even have a decent job then!" She wouldn't accept that ring because Jason was a lot better off than Wolfgang and she expected him to get something much more expensive ... imagine if she found out they were identical rings!! What I found unsettling also, was the fact that only after 2 years the value of that same ring had jumped by almost 50%!
Talk about diamonds being a whole other story!
Ego
at 09:38 on May 21st, 2007
When my brother proposed to my sister-in-law , he gave her a new pair of ski gloves, with a band of gold material around the ring-finger of the left glove. She cried tears of joy, I'm told, as she loves skiing more than rings!
at 10:20 on May 21st, 2007
Amd that, fantastic Sir, is my definition of one very lucky guy!
Ego
at 06:01 on May 22nd, 2007
You know that when someone dies and gets cremated, you can have their ashes(carbon) made into a diamond. Finally a good use for diamonds.
at 05:48 on May 22nd, 2007
Thanks so much for the post - I’ve been thinking about this a lot lately as my sister recently got engaged. Your comment about the apartment struck me at the core – I had a good friend get married – they must have had 400+ people at the wedding (I don’t think I even had time to say hello to half the people there!), I’m sure they spent a small fortune. They now live in a small apartment because they can’t afford anything more… if they put the cost of even half that wedding down, they’d have had a payment on a place 2 times as large… it’s mind boggling
I struggle with wanting my sister to have a wonderful wedding while keeping things sane and not spending a fortune (and I’d much rather see them put the money into a house or apartment or anything for that matter). I swear that if you even mention the word wedding the cost of everything starts sky rocketing… “oh… you want this space for a wedding?” It is a racket, very much the industrial complex, and it makes me sick. The sad reality is that they are getting a fraction of what they want / expected for a lot more then what they expected…
+1 for KFC!
at 06:29 on May 22nd, 2007
And that's really what's all so depressing about weddings ... how couples just throw caution to the wind, trying to make it all so memorable at the very expense of their well-being. What couples must try to make memorable is the union and not some transient process advertising it!
Ego
at 05:16 on May 22nd, 2007
The best wedding I ever went to (better than my own, but shhh) was a pot luck dinner with BYO beer. A couple hundred people showed up and a great bluegrass band played for free; sheer heaven, and it probably cost the happy couple about $100.
at 07:50 on May 22nd, 2007
Hey Brain, it's not me who'd be telling ... it's those reporters from "High Times" that didn't get an invite!
Ego
at 05:28 on May 22nd, 2007
Perhaps Mass Weddings are the way to go. As in the story from India about Couples not having enough money to marry.
Story Link
at 07:08 on May 22nd, 2007
Great idea, find someone elses party/Kegger, then get married there, why be stupid and broke?
at 10:54 on May 22nd, 2007
Thanks, egoigwe (although you should remember to try to put some of your own words with your pieces). Very interesting, though.
As the first woman to comment on here, I just wanted to say that we as females are put in the interesting polarizing position of either supposedly wanting the whole shebang or being diametrically, feministically opposed. As a girl who just went to a wedding this weekend, and who thought a lot about it, I'll say this: for most of us, as with everything, the lines are not black and white/yes and no/fancy or forget it...most of us feel pretty torn between the two.
When I was 15 I said "I'm never getting married." Then I got a bit older and said, "Well, if the right person asks." Now I say, "Christ, I have no idea...and if I say yes or no some part of me is going to regret it either way." Hard spot to be in...nevermind the money or the dress.
at 12:04 on May 22nd, 2007
Hmm ... but I pretty much think it's about the same for most guys except perhaps that the pressure to get married is more on the ladies, same for the stigma of not being married ... at least in Africa it is. I think that too, tends to explain why you're the first lady to join in this discourse but I'd bet my bottom dollar that 90% of the hits to my post came from ladies reading this on the sidelines. It's still quite every lady's dream to get married to her prince and that allows for no contradiction and so the sidelines, you know, like in let's see what the guys are really thinking about this ... after all they get to do the spending not us!
I'm curious, now why wouldn't you want to get married as a 15 year old? I'd really like to know Kaitlin, I'm like whatever happened to you at 15 to put such thought in your head my fair lady?
As for adding some of my own words to the piece, I think I already said quite enough here.
Ego