The Price of E-Voting Secrets: 82 Bucks

by Jordan Yerman | February 16, 2007 at 09:16 am
339 views | 10 Recommendations | 1 comment

It's frightening how simple these machines are, and how breathtakingly easy it is to bend them to your will. It's articles such as this that cement my belief that we should all upgrade to paper ballots.


For a mere $82 a computer scientist and electronic voting critic managed to purchase five $5,000 Sequoia electronic voting machines over the internet last month from a government auction site. And now he's taking them apart.

Princeton computer science professor Andrew Appel and his students have begun reverse-engineering the software embedded in the machines' ROM chips to determine if it has any security holes. But Appel says the ease with which he and his students opened the machines and removed the chips already demonstrates that the voting machines are vulnerable to unauthorized modification.

Their analysis appears to mark the first time that someone who hasn't signed a non-disclosure agreement with Sequoia Voting Systems has examined one of its machine's internals.

Appel bought the machines from election officials in Buncombe County, North Carolina, who offered them for sale at GovDeals.com, a site for government agencies to buy and sell surplus and confiscated equipment. The county sold 144 machines in lots of varying amounts. It paid $5,200 for each machine in 1997. To buy the machines, Appel had to pay $82 and only needed to provide a name, address, phone number and e-mail address.

Sequoia and other voting machine companies have long resisted calls from voting activists to make their proprietary software transparent to the public, because they say it would allow hackers to study the software and devise ways to plant malicious code in it. But Appel says his purchase of the machines shows how easy it is for hackers to obtain and study the software anyway.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
publicreader
publicreader
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 09:53 on February 16th, 2007

What an interesting and important story- in addition to showing how vulnerable the voting machine tecnology is, it shows how completely disconnected from each other government departments are. Anyone with even a modicum of security sense (not to mention public relations nous!) should have been able to prevent a public auction, for heaven's sweet sake, of voting machines. I've flagged this item as good stuff for importance, headline, and intro.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from