The Truth Behind the Cartoon News

by war on terrr | February 6, 2006 at 09:58 pm
398 views | 0 Recommendations | 4 comments

Photos

Demonstration of Published Cartoon Row: London, England

Demonstration of Published Cartoon Row: London, England

see larger image

uploaded by Koosha

 

"We’re starting to see the details of the conspiracy behind the Danish cartoon scandal. The Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten, which started the problem by actually commissioning cartoons that would make Muslims furious as an experiment to see if political correctness would prevent the cartoons from being published – you can’t make this stuff up! - supports the anti-immigration Danish governing coalition, and has historic ties going back to the 1920s and 1930s to European fascism.

 

The editor in question, Flemming Rose, apparently has ties to Daniel Pipes (as if we couldn’t see that coming!). The point was clearly to incite Muslim riots to enforce the idea that the ‘clash of civilizations’ means that immigration to Europe - particularly Muslim immigration - must be stopped, and to lead credence to the idea that Muslims are all irrational and violent, and can’t be dealt with except through violence. "

 

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
war on terrr

I commented earlier that this event carries the markings of a classic false flag operation.  Not sure what that is?  See what wikipedia has to say:

"False flag operations are covert operations conducted by
governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed
to appear as if they are being carried out by other entities. The name
is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than your own." 

0
tomywomy

These conspiracy theories are very hard to believe. For this to be true, we have to believe that the danish newspaper knew that publishing a cartoon would actually invoke widespread riots and then did so on purpose. Frankly, the TV show 24 is more plausible.

0
Troy

Tomy,

Insulting  the Prophet is a completly different issue.  

You are playing with THE MOST IMPORTANT VALUE of 1 billion muslims. 

This is the biggest help Bin Ladin can get ...........
 
"One's freedom ends where other's freedom starts"
 PS: Why are you guys picking up the worst pictures...I
saw a picture of a kid holding a banner saying " Jesus is our Prophet,
Moses is our Prophet,  Mohammad is our Profit, Show respect to our
Profits". Real muslims do belive in Jesus, Moses, and respect them...

Peace...

 

0
Shorebreak

100's of thousands of people in multiple countries across various regions of the world do not rise up simultaneously with signs and banners to protest cartoons that are months old - without significant planning, coordination, and influence over the community.


 That tells me at least two things. The first is that this recent uprising is likely not a surprise to Western authorities who monitor the activities of activist Muslim groups. The second is that this coordinated effort is not a response, but is more likely the foundation for a catalyst. The timing, preparation, and organization of these banner carrying protestors suggests that this entire episode has been staged to "generate" a response, not "as" a response.


From this, the only logical conclusion is that some group or groups anticipate receiving a benefit from the protests. The question then becomes "Who is/are these groups, and what do they expect to gain?"


The organizers are obviously skilled at disseminating information and in influencing people. This suggests that their strategic goal has most likely been planned and thought out to the same degree as the planning to stage protests and to generate broad international cultural support for the effort.


Not knowing what the specific goal may be, but understanding that a great deal of planning and forethought has gone into orchestrating recent events, we can speculate at some of the possible results by asking a few pointed questions.


1. How will these protests influence Western populations? As a result, are Westerners likely to be more sympathetic to Muslim concerns, or less sympathetic?


2. How will these events influence Muslim populations - particularily in predominantly Islamic nations? Are Muslims likely to be more sympathetic to the West, or less?


3. Are these events more likely to "increase" Western public support for broader action in the Middle East, or to "decrease" Western public support?


4. Looking at the protests as a potential planned catalyst with an end game in sight, do they generally support the goals of the Middle East and the Muslim community, or do they support the goals of the Western governments seeking the further 'democratization" of the Middle East?


5. Considering the timing of events, the ultimate question here is "Are Europeans and Western populations now more likely, or less likely, to support military action against Iran or other Islamic nations?


These protests have been planned for months. Who stands to benefit the most?

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from