NP Rank:
We must attack Iran before it gets the bomb
We must attack Iran before it gets the bomb
By Toby Harnden in Washington
Last Updated: 3:32am BST 16/05/2007
# Audio: John Bolton on Blair's 'poodle' tag
Iran should be attacked before it develops nuclear weapons, America's former ambassador to the United Nations said yesterday.
Former US ambassador to the UN John Bolton said Iran should be attacked before it develops nuclear weapons
John Bolton has close links to the Bush administration
John Bolton, who still has close links to the Bush administration, told The Daily Telegraph that the European Union had to "get more serious" about Iran and recognise that its diplomatic attempts to halt Iran's enrichment programme had failed.
Iran has "clearly mastered the enrichment technology now...they're not stopping, they're making progress and our time is limited", he said. Economic sanctions "with pain" had to be the next step, followed by attempting to overthrow the theocratic regime and, ultimately, military action to destroy nuclear sites.
Mr Bolton's stark warning appeared to be borne out yesterday by leaks about an inspection by the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) of Iran's main nuclear installation at Natanz on Sunday.
The experts found that Iran's scientists were operating 1,312 centrifuges, the machines used to enrich uranium. If Iran can install 3,000, it will need about one year to produce enough weapons grade uranium for one nuclear bomb.
advertisement
Experts had judged that Iran would need perhaps two years to master the technical feat of enriching uranium using centrifuges - and then another two years to produce enough material to build a weapon.
But the IAEA found that Iran has already managed to enrich uranium to the four per cent purity needed for power stations. Weapons-grade uranium must reach a threshold of 84 per cent purity.
Mohammed ElBaradei, the IAEA's head, said the West's goal of halting the enrichment programme had been "overtaken by events". Iran had probably mastered this process and "the focus now should be to stop them from going to industrial scale production".
Mr Bolton said: "It's been conclusively proven Iran is not going to be talked out of its nuclear programme. So to stop them from doing it, we have to massively increase the pressure.
"If we can't get enough other countries to come along with us to do that, then we've got to go with regime change by bolstering opposition groups and the like, because that's the circumstance most likely for an Iranian government to decide that it's safer not to pursue nuclear weapons than to continue to do so. And if all else fails, if the choice is between a nuclear-capable Iran and the use of force, then I think we need to look at the use of force."
President George W Bush privately refers to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who has pledged to
Crowd Power
-
Edmund Jenks
Los Angeles, California, United States





Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (1)
at 20:32 on May 15th, 2007
is there any evidence that Iran actually intends to build a bomb?
at 03:18 on May 16th, 2007
An then lets go after Korea and maybe Pakistan, sure their allies now, but we've overlooked that before and they already have the bomb! And what about those freaking Canadians? They've got the cabability to make the bomb, and lord knows they're a bunch of pinko terrorist harbouring medicare providing communists... Nuke Ottawa and keep the Stanley Cup American!!!!
But I digress...
at 16:09 on May 17th, 2007
Butv wait!! There's more!!
America has a bomb (well lots) Perhaps they should attack themselves....
And France has nuclear power - ooh they could build a bomb, nuke them to, and every other nation that has nuclear power....