Truemors
is reporting from
Member
NP Rank:
NP Rank:
Changes in the Sun’s Surface to Bring Next Climate Change
Share:
by atomcat | January 6, 2008 at 08:52 am
2682 views | 12 Recommendations | 6 comments
Photos
Changes in the Sun’s Surface to Bring Next Climate Change
January 2, 2008
Today, the Space and Science Research Center, (SSRC) in Orlando, Florida announces that it has confirmed the recent web announcement of NASA solar physicists that there are substantial changes occurring in the sun’s surface. The SSRC has further researched these changes and has concluded they will bring about the next climate change to one of a long lasting cold era.
Today, Director of the SSRC, John Casey has reaffirmed earlier research he led that independently discovered the sun’s changes are the result of a family of cycles that bring about climate shifts from cold climate to warm and back again.
“We today confirm the recent announcement by NASA that there are historic and important changes taking place on the sun’s surface. This will have only one outcome - a new climate change is coming that will bring an extended period of deep cold to the planet. This is not however a unique event for the planet although it is critically important news to this and the next generations. It is but the normal sequence of alternating climate changes that has been going on for thousands of years. Further according to our research, this series of solar cycles are so predictable that they can be used to roughly forecast the next series of climate changes many decades in advance. I have verified the accuracy of these cycles’ behavior over the last 1,100 years relative to temperatures on Earth, to well over 90%.”
As to what these changes are Casey says, “The sun’s surface flows have slowed dramatically as NASA has indicated. This process of surface movement, what NASA calls the “conveyor belt” essentially sweeps up old sunspots and deposits new ones. NASA’s studies have found that when the surface movement slows down, sunspot counts drop significantly. All records of sunspot counts and other proxies of solar activity going back 6,000 years clearly validates our own findings that when we have sunspot counts lower then 50 it means only one thing - an intense cold climate, globally. NASA says the solar cycle 25, the one after the next that starts this spring will be at 50 or lower. The general opinion of the SSRC scientists is that it could begin even sooner within 3 years with the next solar cycle 24. What we are saying today is that my own research and that of the other scientists at the SSRC verifies that NASA is right about one thing – a solar cycle of 50 or lower is headed our way. With this next solar minimum predicted by NASA, what I call a “solar hibernation,” Full report here:
space-and-science-research-center.pdf
Advertisement
NowPublic on Facebook
What is NowPublic?
NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.
Most Recommended Comment
Crowd Power
Albert Milliron
Columbia, South Carolina, United States
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (6)
at 14:58 on January 6th, 2008
You referring to the Political Blog: "Blowing our tax dollars on wind farms", the nuke industry pays you for clicks?
p.s Windfarms are the greatest business opportunities for your generation with germany and china worldleaders.
They will also produce Hydrogen for clean fuel cell cars. Don't mind petrol and uranium are finished before 2050.
If you blame the sun, means you could continue to CO2 pollute the planet, means you have no oxygen to breath
when 3 bn India-Chinese start to follow you. Reality is quiet diifferent. Climate engineering and terraforming next
industry.
at 15:25 on January 6th, 2008
Solarlife, My blog is not political and I wish I was getting paid by someone. I'm not. In fact it has cost me about $40,000.00 so far. I do what I do as a matter of principal. Truth is hard to come by these days. When media only expresses one side of a story, global warming in this case, it should cause people to ask questions and demand answers to those questions.
Thanks for your comment and if you would like to send me some money let me know. It would be appreciated.
Ron
at 20:05 on January 6th, 2008
atomcat, Good stuff.
I was Just Warming up to the idea of Global warming! Now I have chills up my spine.
If the solar cycle 24 produces sunspot number index in the 50s it has implecations for radio commnications as well. Maximum Usable frequencies will be lower. AM radio be much better at nighttime. Those ham radio operators out there will finally get 100 countries on 160 meters (1.8-2.0 Mhz). If you have old radio gear, the tubes will keep you warm as well.
I read a Russian Scientist came up with the same theroy of Global Cooling, but with differant premises. Does this mean that Albert Gore has to give his Nobel back?
Thanks for the article
Albert Milliron, AL7KT
at 08:11 on January 7th, 2008
The Space Science Research Center located in Orlando, FL is the name given to the effort of one person, John Casey. Mr. Casey has created the SSRC by renting 'virtual' office space (that is, he pays for a receptionist, call-taking and message-forwarding services, etc.) from Intelligent Office of Orlando (which provides the same service for 200+ other 'companies' at his Orlando location. [http://www.intelligentoffice.com/list.html])
In this recent press release, John takes a NASA press release from May 2006, and 'confirms' the findings within it. There is no evidence that he gives of any science (or analysis) that he has performed on the science that NASA has done.
John then takes NASA's year-and-a-half old report of the slowing of the Sun's Great Conveyor Belt which is expected to lead to reduced sunspot activity in the year 2020 (or thereabouts), and uses it to (unsupportably) undergird his belief: We will experience a deep wave of global cold temperature which will cause riots, famine, and disease.
NASA's scientists make no such claim. They say that reduced sunspot activity will result in fewer (and less intense) solar flares and radiation storms. That is all.
at 15:20 on January 7th, 2008
Moonwolf
The people who are pushing Global Warming don't seem convinced about it's reality
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming,
water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill …All these
dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed
attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome.
The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”
- Club of Rome,
The First Global Revolution,
consultants to the UN.
“…we need to get some broad based support, to capture the public’s imagination…. So we have to offer up scary scenarios,
make simplified, dramatic statements and make little mention of any doubts…. Each of us has to decide what the right balance
is between being effective and being honest.“
- Stephen Schneider,
Stanford Professor of Climatology
lead Author of many IPCC reports
“We’ve got to ride this global warming
issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing
the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy.“
- Timothy Wirth,
fmr US Under Sec of State,
current Head of the UN Foundation
“No matter if the science of global
warming is all phony… climate change provides the greatest opportunity
to bring about justice and equality in the world.”
- Christine Stewart,
fmr Canadian Minister of the Environment
“The only way to get our society to truly change is to frighten people with the possibility of a catastrophe.”
- emeritus professor Daniel Botkin
“We are on the verge of a global transformation.
All we need is the right major crisis…”
- David Rockefeller,
Club of Rome executive member
at 20:37 on January 13th, 2008
atomcat, I like this story. It's good stuff.