NP Rank:
Weblogs 'need content warnings'
[q
url="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6540385.stm"]Readers
should be warned when they are reading blogs that may contain "crude
language", a draft blogging code of conduct has suggested.
The code was drawn up by web pioneer Tim O'Reilly following published threats
and perceived harassment to US developer Kathy Sierra on blogs.
The code begins: "We celebrate the blogosphere because it embraces frank
and open conversation."
The draft says people should not be allowed to leave anonymous comments.
Blogs which are open and uncensored should post an "anything goes"
logo to the site to warn readers, the code suggests.
Readers of these blogs would be warned: "We are not responsible for the
comments of any poster, and when discussions get heated, crude language,
insults and other "off colour" comments may be encountered.
Participate in this site at your own risk."
The draft will now be assessed and amended by bloggers around the world.
The code states: "We are committed to the 'Civility Enforced' standard: we
will not post unacceptable content, and we'll delete comments that contain
it."
The draft defines unacceptable content as anything included or linked to that
is being used to "abuse, harass, stalk, or threaten others".
It also refers to libellous material, infringement of copyright or trademark
and violations of privacy.
Prominent
blogger Kathy Sierra called on the blogosphere to combat the culture of abuse
online after a series of death threats forced her to cancel a public appearance
and suspend her blog.
Ms
Sierra described on her blog how she had been subject to a campaign of threats,
including a post that featured a picture of her next to a noose.
At
the heart of the issue is the degree of freedom afforded to people who want to
comment on blog posts.
"If
those published comments could be construed as a threat, and the perpetrator
doesn't withdraw them and apologise, we will cooperate with law enforcement to
protect the target of the threat," the code states.
The
code has had mixed support among bloggers.
Jimmy
Wales, the co-founder of Wikipedia, told BBC Radio 5 Live's Pods and Blogs
programme: "The question is: Do we allow people to use our blogs as places
to embark on threatening behaviour and really abusive personal insults?
"You
don't have to insult people to be frank."
But
the code was not welcome by blogger and commentator Jeff Jarvis, who called it
"misguided".
On
his blog, he wrote: "This effort misses the point of the internet, blogs,
and even of civilized behavior. They treat the blogosphere as if it were a
school library where someone... can maintain order and control. They treat it
as a medium for media.
"It's
a place. And when I moved into the place that is my town, I didn't put up a
badge on my fence saying that I'd be a good neighbor."
He
added: "I don't need anyone lecturing me and telling me not to be
disagreeable."
[/q]



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (3)
at 14:47 on April 10th, 2007
In the META tags there is a tag that indicates if the page is for everyone, mature, or what ever. You could Google META TAGS and find the ratings, These inform the Bots or search crawlers of the page content. So it's there, it just needs to be used and accessed by the sensitive public if that's what you're suggesting.
People need to deal with it. I'm not my brothers keeper. How about the religious quotes from the pious? It offends me.ROFL Then there's... everything offends someone. Foreign languages that I can't read are offensive. Jews are offended by Nazi slogans, so where will it all end? Gay's offend some, sexual content some? Lawyers speak makes me want to heave, So how do I discern libelous material and how would it be excluded? I can't stand to hear about medical illness and surgery and puss and sputum, and all that.
USUALLY THE GIVE AWAY IS THE TITLE.
Beyond that a little light skimming of sites and blocking the URL's from your browser, sounds mildly smart. Nothing like being Self reliant.
Tell me where this has been instituted in books and magazines? Is Mickey Spillaine, Dirty or classic?
"I recently watched an old interview with Mickey Spillane. In the interview, he was asked about the sex and violence in his books, more specifically, about the ending to I, The Jury. He explains how the scene operates on many levels, that it wasn't just some lurid confrontation between a woman killer and the man sworn to avenge her victim." Mickey Spillaine
__________________________________________________________
Posted -by aspirationjones-
"should be warned when they are reading blogs that may contain "crude
language", a draft blogging code of conduct has suggested." - Weblogs 'need content warnings' -
__________________________________________________________
I'm not all that well read, but I've never seen the warning in a preface or on the cover of books. The Bible has some fairly harsh stuff in it, should it carry a warning?
at 15:00 on April 10th, 2007
I agree with the above. The Internet is a community in and of itself, though it's considerably less regulated in real terms than the physical world. Still, you interact with strangers and exchange info that may or not be "work-safe". It's best to keep your eyes open for stuff that offends you and do your best to steer your kids towards healthy surfing habits, but a Net Nanny State seems a bit unnecessary.
Thanks for highlighting this article-- it's an excellent talking point!
at 11:50 on April 11th, 2007
Here is another thread on this.