When Journalism became transcription...

by biverson | April 28, 2007 at 09:57 am
334 views | 10 Recommendations | 2 comments
So rather than, say, do the real work of reporting news, journalism has become a profession that is almost entirely about PR, transcription and packaging Establishment spin for news copy. This is why, for example, many of the highest-profile political “journalists” like Joe Klein and David Broder never bother to actually report anything anymore - but instead spend most of their time pontificating on horse race polls and campaign gossip, expecting us to believe that’s real “news.”
All I can say personally, is that is why, even as a journalism educator I don't watch TV news or give it much credit as "news" or "journalism." This reminds me of Studs Terkel's great line about embedded reporters -- he claimed it was his age and infirmity, but he thought they had called themselves "in bed with" journalists...

Beinart admits that despite his preening around as an expert, he’d never actually been to Iraq, but nonetheless insists that he is “a political journalist.” So Moyers naturally asks that as a “political journalist” what kind of reporting did he do to make sure his prewar cheerleading was substantively sound. Here’s Beinart’s answer:

    “Well, I was doing mostly, for a large part it was reading, reading the statements and the things that people said. I was not a beat reporter. I was editing a magazine and writing a column. So I was not doing a lot of primary reporting. But what I was doing was a lot of reading of other people’s reporting and reading of what officials were saying.”

Ha, ha, remember the Firesign's line, "I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV," and another favorite is Dr. Science, who tells us over and over, I'm not a doctor-- I have a masters in science.  So don't these pompous "commentators" come off like, "I'm not a reporter, I play one  at press conferences." What journalism doesn't need is another syncophant lickspittle apologist for the rich and powerful.


journalism was about sifting through the B.S. in order to challenge power and hold the Establishment accountable. Bill Moyers and the folks I’ve gotten to know at McClatchy Newspapers who Moyers highlights show that that long tradition still exists. But the fact that they are such rare exceptions to the rule also show that the incentive system in journalism today is to reward not the people who challenge power, but the people who worship it

This is why Murrow and some of the pioneers of early broadcasting like Harry Skornia wanted the  airwaves to be "common carriers" not the personal province of monied interests. Telecomm reform in the 80s by both Republican and Democrat interest groups worked to put the broadcast and media channels out to bid to the ones who could pay the most. When GE buys the company you work for, how critical can you be of weapons manufacture and other businesses they own. Net neutrality is a key issue if there is to be any non-capitalist dominated discourse in the USA.


Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
Jordan Yerman
Jordan Yerman
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 09:20 on April 28th, 2007

biverson, your work is thought-provoking and clever, and this is no exception. MSM is the opposite of the net-neutrality concept of unbiased access; for example, the pre-invasion coverage of Iraq by  MSM was little more than a collectiion of adverts for stealth bombers.

Working a Dr. Science reference in there was the real coup...

Good stuff.

0
chaz

"journalism has become a profession that is almost entirely about PR,
transcription and packaging Establishment spin for news copy. "

 

Didn't someone once say "the first casualty of war is the truth", if they didn't then "they" should have.  The sad part is that, before and after war, the truth has also  become (MIA). In an attempt to make money, push an agenda and plain lack of conviction  for the  truth, the body News has faded into mediocrity.  Journalists or Media specialists, is there a difference and who among us cares? 

 

It appears the more money involved, the better regulated and educated things become, the more mediocre it also becomes.   

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from