Why Jehovah's Witnesses Demand To Be Treated Without Transfusions

by alaaron | May 25, 2007 at 11:43 am
633 views | 0 Recommendations | 2 comments
One of the leading practitioners of "bloodless surgery" says that when Jehovah's Witnesses demand to be treated without transfusions - as parents of premature babies in Quebec City and Vancouver have done recently - they are not relying on junk science.

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
0
ReBuff

Maybe the JW's could build thier own hospitals and have thier own doctors?  Something like the Shriners?  Maybe the JW's could become Shriners??  The whole thing is a circus, isn't it??

0
DannyHaszard

 

It is the Watchtower that has heaped controversy on itself with it's arbitrary flip-flopping decisions on what "parts" aka fractions of Blood are allowed and disallowed.

If you go by the old testament it says to pour ALL the blood onto the ground as dust as it is ALL sacred to God.So,where does the Watchtower get the authority to decide what "parts" of something that is sacred can be used??

Moreover,no question it's more healthy not to put another persons blood or any body parts into your body if you don't need it.In cases of emergency trauma such as in a car crash if I lose 3-4 pints of blood I will die without an emergency transfusion there is no time for fancy modern gadgets or vitamin supplements to 'build up my blood'.
Case in point,I had a 'totalproctocolectomy' major surgery and did all the things you JW's suggest to build up and prep my body for surgery and had two pints of my own blood (forbidden by the WT) on standby that my skilled surgeon did not have to use.BUT I had 3 months to prepare for that surgery.

Some cases need immediate life-saving emergency blood transfusions and the watchtower's doctrine Say's NO.


Too, common sense says in cases where someone is gushing blood there isn’t time to slowly try to bring up blood volume with expanders etc.

The Watchtower WILL excommunicate you if they find out a baptized JW has had a transfusion.To deny this and say it's a "personal conscience matter" is a lie.

It is predicted that in possibly 10-20 years an "artificial souless blood" will be available for everybody putting an end to Red Cross collections and the blood transfusion controversy.
__
Tell the truth don't be afraid,Danny Haszard born 1957 3rd generation JW


Some educational links provided below:
http://www.ajwrb.org/  Jehovah Witness blood policy reform site

http://www.towertotruth.net/Articles/blood_transfusions.htm  Will you die for a lie?

(Jehovah's Witnesses do use many products that are derived from blood banks (so called blood 'fractions') but they themselves won't donate a drop)

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from