Why Nothing gets done in New Orleans

by René | May 14, 2007 at 04:32 pm
793 views | 7 Recommendations | 8 comments

Photos

One 'Chocolate City' response at the Rex Parade Mardi Gras 2006

One 'Chocolate City' response at the Rex Parade Mardi Gras 2006

see larger image

uploaded by René

Why nothing gets done in New Orleans Tuesday, May 1 2007

Uncategorized CB 7:00 am

Have you’ ever wondered why New Orleans lags so far behind in the “recovery”? Ever wonder why nothing seems to get done in New Orleans? Ever wonder who is in charge in New Orleans? Ever wonder why the public education system is so poor? Ever wonder why people are leaving New Orleans?

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
TheArgus
TheArgus
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 18:04 on May 14th, 2007

I am sure Nagin, the roll model of leadership that he is, will get right on it. With the very next spot that opens up on the local radio station, he'll get on the air and scream, "Won't somebody help us with this!"

davidjon
davidjon
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 13:06 on May 15th, 2007

René, I like this story. It's good stuff.


New Orleans - a microcosm of 60 years corruption under un-challenged Democratic "leadership." And Schoolbus Nagin believes the thousands who left will someday return? Dream on. 

0
René

I really liked that "Ray Wonka" picture, but it wouldn't copy when I highlighted it.

so ya'll just have to click the link to see it

 

You shoulda seen the response last year at the Mardi Gras parades about chocolate city etc. I bet they were even better this year.

I got one pic from that. Maybe I'll upload it. later.. 

0
PMN

I know why New Orleans lags behind in recovery. Visit Haiti. Visit Zimbabwe (formerly Rhodesia and the breadbasket of Africa). Visit South Africa (once the economic powerhouse of the continent). All black-ruled now and all totally dependent on economic and food aid form Western nations (America and Europe). There is no single exception. Politically incorrect? Absolutely? A sad truth? Without question.

The populace in New Orleans is waiting for The Man to come in and fix it all up for them. The descendents of slaves rely on the descendents of slaveowners to care for them more than a hundred and forty years after the end of the evil practice. People in Africa who were never slaves (and sold their brethren into slavery) rely on the Europeans to take care of them. Medical science is now proving that race is not a "social construct"; it's strictly biology. It's going to result in a mean and cold truth for the egailtarians and Marxists. Those who vehemently disagree are entitled to do so. Me? I might change my mind once I consider a Liberian engineered automobile; or an energy-efficient Congonese washer and dryer; hell, I'd settle for a wooden salad and fork serving set from Watts. But it ain't gonna happen.

0
René

You are wrong! They aren't waiting. Some even started before the floods totally receded. But it's damn hard to get work done on houses when there's no electricity, no water, no utilities, or trash pickup in areas hardest hit. Waterlines were damaged and clean drinking water isn't even available in many parts of New Orleans, and this is a major American City, almost two years after Katrina!

See my story New Orleans Rescues Itself

According to you: "The populace in New Orleans is waiting for The Man to come in and fix
it all up for them. The descendents of slaves rely on the descendents
of slaveowners to care for them.."

You obviously know nothing about New Orleans, Loiusiana, or the South. The slaves were doing all the caretaking, don't you know, that's why Reconstruction lasted so long in the South, the caretakers were gone.

Are you saying everyone now in New Orleans are descendants of slaves? 

 

 

0
PMN

"slaves were doing all the caretaking"? Not all. Far from it. You must be a transplanted Northerner. 93% of Confederate soldiers did not own slaves nor had a vested interest in defending the institution (as a matter of fact, they were in direct competition on many levels (skilled and unskilled) with slaves for paid labor). Anyhow, back to your ridiculous comment "slaves were doing all the caretaking"- those slaves who were, had to be provided both directions and materials to do so. It's akin to saying riveters built the space shuttle and ignoring the engineers, planning and funding.

I'll wager I know much more about the South and history than you. And I am talking about facts. Not what you may have seen on a television serial drama and concluded was true as it fit comfortably into your worldview. Of course, you are entitled to your own opinion- but not your own facts.

0
René

You might lose that wager. I grew up in the South, and studied local and area history avidly. In fact, at La Tech, Civil War History was a required subject, two semesters of it.

Nevertheless your 'general statements'  are opinion, not fact.  I am not denying the injustice and harm of slavery on both those owned and the owners. Unfortunately slavery has not been eliminated in the world, and is quite rampant in Africa. Those doing the enslaving are mostly Islamic, which was also true during the Western world's slave era.

You have shown your ignorance of who the residents of New Orleans actually are. 

Did you just sign up yesterday so you could flame and inflame? 

0
PMN

I disagree with your facts and you begin hurling invectives? Who knows what you may have been taught at La Tech- they either did a poor job (likely if you graduated recently as the version you were handed was politically inflected) or you misunderstood. Reconstruction lasted years for a number of reasons. Some states emerged earlier than others. The primary reason it was prolonged was that Johnson was a Southern Dem and was placed on the ticket with Lincoln as he was the only Southern senator not to leave office upon secession. But Johnson was not sympathetic to the Republican party or reconstruction efforts. This was the largest cause (or at least equal to some others) that prolonged the implementation of reconstruction as it began. And it ended in Louisiana in 1868- a relatively short time. Your "slaves doing all the caretaking" theory is just simplistic. I can go on and on about the real reasons, but it would do no good to present facts you cannot grasp or refuse to accept.

We can agree about Africa. There are more slaves today than there have ever been. A shocker to the uniformed. And the institution thrives on one continent in particular and is sanctioned by one religion specifically. Where is the outrage? Life must be particularly dirt cheap in Sudan.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

TheArgus
First Flagged at 6:04 PM, May 14, 2007 by TheArgus
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in World

 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from