NP Rank:
’04 Election Apologists Still Unmoved By Mountain of Evidence: Columbus Dispatch Ignores Facts by Bob Fitrakis
I'm posting this oped because it's recent and gives a good overview of documented problems with the 2004 US presidential election; anyone interested in learning more about election integrity and the opportunity for (and evidence of) fraud in the US electoral process can get a good start at freepress.org. Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman et al of the Ohio Free Press have been doing yeoman's work in documenting the problems with the voting systems and elections in Ohio (and elsewhere). This article is a good overview and his claims are backed up in articles and documents previously published on the site. Democrats, Republicans, 3rd parties and independents should all be in favor of having elections that are transparent and secure; how else can we be sure that the elections represent the will of the people? A government that doesn't have the appearance of legitimacy loses legitimacy, and that is destructive to democracy and the Republic. Who would want that?
Columbus Dispatch articles explaining the 2004 election irregularities all embrace the same formula: ignore the more than 1000 signed affidavits and sworn testimonies of disenfranchised voters; rely only on the word of OSU Law Professor Dan Tokaji who has no background in statistical analysis and who always tells the Dispatch whatever they want to hear; and then apologize for former Ohio Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell and fail to mention what is routinely reported in every other major newspaper in the state of Ohio.
In the Sunday, August 10 Dispatch front page story, the paper conveniently avoids reporting on Blackwell’s well-documented activities. There’s no mention of: Blackwell’s directive that returned voter registration applications that weren’t on “80-bond paper weight”; Blackwell’s refusal to count the votes for the first time in modern Ohio history if voters were at the right polling place but the wrong precinct table; the fact that Blackwell outsourced Ohio’s official vote count tabulation to Michael Connell, a Bush family partisan who sent the vote tally to a Republican server site in Chattanooga, Tennessee tied to the White House; or of his full-court blitz on TV trying to get Democratic Presidential candidate John Kerry to concede with 250,000 uncounted votes
The Dispatch claims “there’s no direct proof of widespread fraud.” This may be true. But, in an election where the exit polls showed Kerry winning by 3 percentage points, all you need is a “little bit of” fraud to flip the numbers. And that’s exactly what the exit polls showed. That instead of Kerry winning 52% to 48%, Bush wins 51% to 48.5%.
So biased was the Dispatch reporting that they either engaged in deliberate propaganda or made errors so simple that they would have flunked Intro to Politics 101 at any college. Tokaji, who admitted to having no training in exit polling, told the AP, and hence the world, that the unexplainable discrepancy between the exit poll numbers and the actual vote count was not a problem.
A few more I grabbed quick just to get you started:
Ohio will likely face big vote-counting problems in 2008 by Steven Rosenfeld December 19, 2007
The GOP's cyber election hit squad by Steven Rosenfeld and Bob Fitrakis April 22, 2007
Crowd Power
-
Erik Larson
Washington, District Of Columbia, United States




Comments (0)