NP Rank:
13,000 People Will Be Killed At The 2012 Games : Rockefeller
by UFO Blogger | May 16, 2012 at 09:58 am
674 views | 0 Recommendations | 1 comment
In our last article we had reported "Olympic Attack : London Olympics 2012 False Flag Operation Clues Deciphered" read more
In latest development, we had recived the down below report, what we find interesting is that on page 34 of the Scenario Planning Document of the Rockefeller Foundation, they state specifically that 13,000 people will be killed at the 2012 Olympics.
They state this in the "Past Tense" as if it has already happened or is planned. They also name other disasters following this one by year. read it all
Advertisement


Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (1)
at 10:37 on May 16th, 2012
This Rockefeller report, if legitimate (and it certainly looks like it's real), is puzzling. Obviously, the foundation is "gaming out" the future. But what is the basis for the predictions contained therein, such as the Olympics bomb reference and the scenario that families worldwide will stop vaccinating their children over fears that vaccines are tainted with lethal substances? Some believe that eugenicists are using vaccines to achieve their goal of reducing the world's population (sparing the "elites," of course).
This report reminds me of the pre- 9/11 report from the Project for a New American Century, which seemed to endorse the staging of a "game changing" world event that would set up the conditions for their global, ideological agenda. As stated in Wikipedia:
Section V of (the PNAC document )Rebuilding America's Defenses, entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force", includes the sentence: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor" Though not arguing that Bush administration PNAC members were complicit in those attacks, other social critics such as commentator Manuel Valenzuela and journalist Mark Danner, investigative journalist John Pilger, in New Statesman, and former editor of The San Francisco Chronicle Bernard Weiner, in CounterPunch, all argue that PNAC members used the events of 9/11 as the "Pearl Harbor" that they needed––that is, as an "opportunity" to "capitalize on" (in Pilger's words), in order to enact long-desired plans.
Instead of simply posting this report, someone should try to figure out why the writers chose these scenarios. It does seem to be something of a blueprint, but without further reporting, it's just another oddity.