2 to 1 say "Better commander in chief"
I just heard George Stephanopoulos quote this poll :
The focus on foreign policy crises over the past month, including the Russian invasion of Georgia, has played to McCain's perceived strengths among the electorate. He holds 2 to 1 leads over Obama in the new poll as the candidate with better knowledge of world affairs and the one who would make a better commander in chief. He is also regarded as superior to Obama in combating international terrorism and has a slender advantage on international affairs generally, the latter thanks to a clear edge among independents.
My question to Democrats (and even Republicans, Independents as well as you vocal foreigners), Is how do you reconcile the fact that in a race that seems to be 50/50 +/- a few%, McCain has a 2 to 1 lead in who is perceived a better Commander In Chief ?