NP Rank:
47.4 Million Americans Live in Poverty
A startling 47.4 million Americans live in poverty, at least that's what is being reported by the National Academy of Science. That means about one in six Americans is at or below the poverty line.
However, there is a great disparity between NAS' findings, and those made by the government's official figure. The Census Bureau's number is 39.8 million, or about 7 million less than the figures calculated by NAS.
The reason that the Census' numbers are way off is because its measurements, designed in 1955, are antiquated. They don't include factors such as "rising medical care, transportation, child care or geographical variations in living costs".
The NAS formula shows the poverty rate to be at 15.8 percent, or nearly 1 in 6 Americans, according to calculations released this week. That's higher than the 13.2 percent, or 39.8 million, figure made available recently under the original government formula.
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
-
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
Steven McDonald
United States
Recommendations (42)
-
Mritunjay
Mumbai, Maharashtra, India -
Hugh Askew
Omaha, Nebraska, United States -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States
-
a211423
Clearlake, California, United States -
Spydermonkey
huntsville, Alabama, United States -
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke
Redwater, Alberta, Canada -
Ninja Mayhem
Middlesex, United Kingdom






Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (13)
at 03:52 on October 21st, 2009
Out of curiosity, i would be interested in knowing what percentage of those living in "poverty" have cable television, internet connection, more than one car, or a big screen teevee.
"poverty" being relative, i'm guessing the truth is what someone wants it to be.
at 05:31 on October 21st, 2009
hi hi
at 05:47 on October 21st, 2009
its sad to see so many poor people in a land of plenty, poverty means not being able to feed your family....have seen it up close and personal...it isnt pretty nor nice
at 05:59 on October 21st, 2009
Doesn't really seem possible it in such a wealthy country it very sad to be honest. I'm glad i live in western europe where welfare and healthcare are free all be it at a basic level.
at 07:45 on October 21st, 2009
roy perhaps they are "fat" because of poor nutrition/does that mean the skinnier you are the richer you are..............
at 07:58 on October 21st, 2009
often, it is lack of exercise, as much as diet. just sayin'
at 14:44 on October 21st, 2009
Roy C. You might try a little compassion. Obviously you don't know what you are talking about, especially about the food poor or rich people eat for that matter.
at 15:05 on October 21st, 2009
I probably know more about nutrition than you could ever hope to know, let alone understand. As for diet books, they are only on the market to make money. Doesn't sound like you know much about healthy eating. And yes it does take money to eat healthy, The cheapest foods, at least in the U.S., are potatoes and rice. Also sugar is a big part of the problem of obesity.
Also helps to have good parents who see that one has a good understanding of what it takes to be healthy. Which includes proper exercise and lots of fruits, veggies and nuts.
You can consider this your lesson for the day.
at 15:19 on October 21st, 2009
In Canada and the UK it's way cheaper to eat badly than it is to eat well. As someone who doesn't eat meat and who likes to eat tons of fruit and vegetables, I spend way more money on my food bill thank some of my friends. It would be way cheaper for me to eat badly and buy white bread and pre-packaged deli meat and cheap mayo, but I just can't eat that stuff so for me to buy whole grain bread, fresh vegetables and real mustard, it's way way way more expensive.
I can't say I know about the US though, but that's what I know about shopping in Canadian and British supermarkets, having lived in both countries for many years.
at 15:22 on October 21st, 2009
Roy
Instead of beating poor people over the head with your nutrition stick, wouldn't it be better to suggest ways to get the message out about what constitutes healthy eating with a low budget?
There needs to be a campaign similar to the "stop smoking" campaigns that had ads on tv, radio, newspapers, etc. Good nutrition on a budget can be done, but people need to have some guidence about how to do it. I grew up thinking everything was fried......even bologne! And I had to learn about broiling and not re using bacon fat to fry with. The next generation hopefully will have better, healthier eating habits than I had as a young adult.
at 08:10 on October 22nd, 2009
And the subsidies we pay farmers for corn, soybeans, ect. push down the cost of most all processed food.
Roy, here is a challenge for you, next time you go shopping look at the cheapest foods, now find one without "high fructose corn syrup" you can, BUT it will probably be a "diet" version, & just because it doesn't have it listed doesn't mean much see also maltodextrin & a number of other added sweeteners that are used in processed food (know any diabetics? they have to read ALL labels for that reason)
at 09:06 on October 28th, 2009
Hi all, For anyone that is interested about the information on food labels, the quick and easy way is: on the Nutrition Facts find the Total Carbohydrate then find the sub-group Sugars. The closer those two numbers, the worse the item is for you. Fats are important , but not half as important as carbs. It's not fat that is the problem as much as ALL those left over carbs that the body goes and coverts into fat to store. For those that my question this, yes I'm diabetic 60 units daily (NPH and Reg.).Nutrition is a complex problem that can not be solved by simple methods, access to and affordability of healthy food is not always easy; nor is the availability of food stamps open to just any and all.This is a good thread and will be interested to see where it goes.
at 22:17 on November 8th, 2009
why does poverty stop people from eating?