On 9/11: the exploitation

by The_Cynic | September 11, 2009 at 09:14 am
160 views | 42 Recommendations | 7 comments

Though not American I can remember the very scene I was in when the first plane hit. And the second. And my shock.

It was a day that I knew would reign in infamy for decades - maybe more. There was massive loss of life, both American and other nations.

I was transfixed on the screen watching the re-runs, the analysis, asking myself why this had happened, though I knew the answer to that in reality.

Being mindful of the shock and the empathy I felt for Americans that day - I cannot, though I have tried, really put into words how much distate and dejection I feel toward those who would exploit the death and carnage.

But, as the old cliché goes "Only in America".

Glenn Beck will be launching his 9/12 project on Saturday - basically to utilise and politicise 9/11 - and corporations within the US are supporting him.

Here is Rachel Maddow's take on this.

I am truly disgusted in Beck for doing this.

recommend Add a comment
3
Amy Judd

Hear hear

1
Paschen

"Only in America" in deed.

0
Rory Cripps

Only in America? What does that mean to y'all? I'm scratching my head, because I've been an American for over a half century  and I still don't know what that means! Clue me in please! Help me! Help me! Apparently Glenn Beck has now scratched a nerve throughout the world! WOW! Glenn Beck--more powerful than the President of the United States!  Beck . . . superman! Yes, there is now no doubt that Glenn Beck is superman!  Glenn Beck has been  pulling President Obama's strings right from the very beginning and people are now just catching on. Americans really are slow, aren't they? There's no doubt in my American mind that Glenn Beck told President Obama the other day to get rid of Van Jones and President Obama  did so without hesitation. See how easily the American voter can be fooled? They voted for President Obama and got Glenn Beck instead! Perhaps if they vote for Glenn Beck, in the next election, they'll get President Obama instead. Only in America I guess!

1
rng

Only in America? What does that mean

I think that an inaccurate statement, I really do. There are issues with the quality and depth of some elements of the American media, it goes lower than most countries, and I think that is what they may be referencing. It is not so much only in America, but more only on some American media channels. Beck is not powerful. He makes money for his masters is all.

0
Rory Cripps

Rng: Now I'm really confused! I thought that Glenn Beck is the one that's pulling the strings and that he's the master! LOL! I agree with you 100% about the quality and depth of some elements of the American media.

1
rng

Beck is a divisive character intent on using a crude wedge to garner attention for the scared and confused segment of the populace. It is a tried and true media tactic...morally despicable but none the less effective as a cash cow.

0
Rory Cripps

Rng: There are plenty of divisive media and political characters out there and they're on both ends of the political spectrum. Their words, actions, and deeds speak for themselves--therefore, it's not necessary to exaggerate and make up stories about those characters. People are obviously pissed off over the fact that certain media personalities have made a big name for themselves and that those same personalities espouse a particular ideology. Guys like Beck, Limbaugh, Hannity, etc. have a huge following and have had so for years. I think that there's a little more to that huge following than just "the scared and confused segment of the populace." There has been a concerted effort to get Beck and those of his talk radio ilk to shut up. And now the effort has been stepped up because Beck has recently played tapes of Van Jone's speeches and comments and has quoted Van Jones and others that are in (or connected to) the Obama administration. Van Jones' words speak for themselves and it was President Obama--not some conservative talker--that accepted Van Jones' resignation. In my opinion, and the opinion of many others, Van Jones is also "a divisive character intent on using a crude wedge to garner attention for the scared and confused segment of the populace." Again: There's divisiveness on both ends of the political spectrum and if we're going to go down the slippery slope of getting our political opponents to shut up and thrown off the air waves, instead of engaging in open and honest dialogue and debate without calling each other names, then the first amendment to the U.S. Constitution will be rendered meaningless. If that should occur, we'll be in big trouble as a nation.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Amy Judd
First Flagged at 10:11 AM, Sep 11, 2009 by Amy Judd

Related Stories

Recommendations (42)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from