9/11 Meteor

As this is a forum I encourage comments and debate. However, there is something suspicious about yours. Specifically, although on the surface they appear to be based on some sort of science, they are actually conjecture. You state that "Nearly every large building has a redundant design that allows for loss of one primary structural member, such as a column".  On what "facts" is this statement based? How would you know that it is one or one hundred? You don't. 

Then you state "However, when multiple members fail, the shifting loads eventually overstress the adjacent members and the collapse occurs like a row of dominoes falling down." "Multiple members" which means what? Which members are you referring to, the outer members or the massive central core constructed of...
“Some of the core columns apparently had outside dimensions of 36 inches by 16 inches. Others had larger dimensions, measuring 52 inches by 22 inches. The core columns were oriented so that their longer dimensions were perpendicular to the core structures' longer, 133-foot-wide sides.”

“The core columns were steel box-columns that were continuous for their entire height, going from their bedrock anchors in the sub-basements to near the towers' tops, where they transitioned to H-beams. Apparently the box columns, more than 1000 feet long, were built as the towers rose by welding together sections several stories tall. The sections were fabricated by mills in Japan that were uniquely equipped to produce the large pieces.” -Found at: www.911research.wtc7.net –Emphasis added by author

...and 
“Then it is impossible that the jet fuel, by itself, raised the temperature of this floor more than 257° C (495° F). Now this temperature is nowhere near high enough to even begin explaining the World Trade Center Tower collapse.” 

“It is not even close to the first critical temperature of 600° C (1,100° F) where steel loses about half its strength and it is nowhere near the quotes of 1500° C that we constantly read about in our lying media.” -The full calculations can be found at: 911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian 2/wtc/how-hot.htm] –Emphasis added by author

...and
“A telegraph from the architectural firm Richard Roth, partner at Emery Roth & Sons, was distributed to reporters on February 14, 1965. The telegraph was in response to claims by real estate baron and Lawrence Wien that the design of the Twin Towers was unsound.”

“THE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS CARRIED OUT BY THE FIRM OF WORTHINGTON, SKILLING, HELLE & JACKSON IS THE MOST COMPLETE AND DETAILED OF ANY EVER MADE FOR ANY BUILDING STRUCTURE. THE PRELIMINARY CALCULATIONS ALONE COVER 1,200 PAGES AND INVOLVE OVER 100 DETAILED DRAWINGS.” 

“4. BECAUSE OF ITS CONFIGURATION, WHICH IS ESSENTIALLY THAT OF A STEEL BEAM 209' DEEP, THE TOWERS ARE ACTUALLY FAR LESS DARING STRUCTURALLY THAN A CONVENTIONAL BUILDING SUCH AS THE EMPIRE STATE BUILDING WHERE THE SPINE OR BRACED AREA OF THE BUILDING IS FAR SMALLER IN RELATION TO ITS HEIGHT.” 

“5. THE BUILDING AS DESIGNED IS SIXTEEN TIMES STIFFER THAN A CONVENTIONAL STRUCTURE. THE DESIGN CONCEPT IS SO SOUND THAT THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER HAS BEEN ABLE TO BE ULTRA-CONSERVATIVE IN HIS DESIGN WITHOUT ADVERSELY AFFECTING THE ECONOMICS OF THE STRUCTURE. -City in the Sky, p 134-6” –Found at: http://stj911.org –Emphasis added by author

You then state...
"As the joists on one or two of the most heavily burned floors gave way and the outer box columns began to bow outward, the floors above them also fell. The floor below (with its 1,300 t design capacity) could not support the roughly 45,000 t of ten floors (or more) above crashing down on these angle clips. This started the domino effect that caused the buildings to collapse within ten seconds, hitting bottom with an estimated speed of 200 km per hour."

This statement is complete conjecture and disinformation. If as you state the heat was sufficient to melt and fracture the area where the floor was attached to the uprights, and this led to a "domino effect" this clearly proves that the massive central core would be still standing. If it collapsed at the same time as the floors the changes of symitry and a smooth decent is zero. Your words are very slippery and nonsense. 

Much appreciated. Try not to be so sensitive. In looking at your channel it appears that all you do is attach to someone else's work. Do you actually contribute?