NP Rank:
9/12 "Million MOB March" A Success Without MSM Help
9/12 "Million MOB March" A Success Without MSM Help
Here in Carter's Second Term, many thought that life would carry on in a business as usual, politics as usual kind of approach.
Sure, Barack Obama made history by becoming the first man with African DNA in his blood to be elected as President of the United States, and sure, he ran and campaigned on being the one man who could reach across the divides in this country by being the first "post-racial" and "post-partisan" chief executive to hold the office ... but that was not meant to be.
Under his leadership (and the leadership of the Democrat-Party controlled Congress), the debt has quadrupled - that is TIMES 4, not a rounding error - with the passage of two large spending bills (Stimulus and Omnibus), a further executive spending initiative known by TARP, started by the previous Administration (Bush) but expanded and used as a tool to take-over two of the three domestic automobile manufacturers in the United States and change the ownership matrix away from investors and place labor unions in the majority ownership position, along with the Federal Government. A serious attempt to take-over about one-sixth of our economy and bring into a single-payer Government program of CONTROL making all decisions about ones health the power of government boards (death panels) while driving out free enterprise. And lastly, an energy policy that would make some forms of common energy (coal and petroleum) virtually unavailable if not very expensive and scarce.
Enter the Tea Party movement.
Named after the uprising and revolt that eventually led to the formation of this country after, as a colony of England, the territory occupied by people who, for the most part left England to start a life free from excessive Monarchical control over their lives from the King of England, had large taxes places on many goods and services produced or imported in the country. A revolt in Boston led to the dumping of bales of tea being imported into the country but this tea had new taxes placed on its sale and so, in a show of defiance, the tea was dumped into the harbor and the Boston Tea Party was born into the lore of the United States.
Today, people (53% and rising) are not happy that their elected representatives are not listening to them. The representatives are voting on, and passing legislation into law without reading the bills that they are voting on. The government is not even allowing any time or the ability for the people to see and read proposed legislation so that they understand what the representatives are committing WE THE PEOPLE to pay for and to do!
September 10, 2001, our country was safe and life was good. September 11, 2001, our country was viciously attacked by a group of 19 islamo-fascist terrorist that wanted to take away the freedoms we enjoy in this country. The day, September, 12 of any year has stood as a response that our freedoms will never die and we will all stand up as Americans to proclaim this to be true.
September 12, 2009, a perfect storm of grass-roots protest came together in Washington DC and it did not have the sponsorship of any political party, no support from special interest groups and/or unions, and absolutely no help from the established "Fourth Estate" known in this country as the Main Stream Media (MSM).
This excerpted and edited from Michelle Malkin -
Celebrating the 9/12 rallies; Turnout estimated at 2 million
By Michelle Malkin • September 12, 2009 10:06 AM
It’s been an unprecedented year for limited government activism. It would never have been possible without the early initiative of grass-roots leaders in the #tcot community on Twitter, Smart Girl Politics #DontGo — and concerned women like Keli Carender and Amanda Grosserode who stood up in their communities against reckless spending in Washington before anyone was listening. Before the cable news was paying attention. Before it became fashionable for politicians to latch on.
Activists were derided as amateurs who couldn’t turn out a crowd. Then they were smeared as corporate shills. They were criticized for not having a coherent message. Then they were mocked for ideological single-mindedness. They are resented by professional strategists who accuse them of organizing empty protests that won’t translate into electoral gains. But the movement has given birth to a new generation of movers and shakers who have rejected establishment partisan politics for nimble, Internet-facilitated, issues-based advocacy.
----
The Tea Party Express blog is here.
12:34pm Eastern: Police estimate 1.2 million in attendance. ABC News reporting crowd at 2 million — tweets Tabitha Hale from D.C.
Teeny, tiny fringe, huh?
----
Update: Tabitha Hale says Parks & Rec estimated 1.2 million. An ABC News correspondent says it wasn’t national ABC News network that reported 2 million figure. I take them at their word — and am checking to find out more info.
So, how many were there? Allah looks at the numbers reports here.
Reference Here>>
COMMENT (to attendance article made at a social media portal):
ABC News, citing the DC fire department, reported that between 60,000 and 70,000 people had attended the tea party rally at the Capitol. By the time this figure reached Michelle Malkin, however, it had been blown up to 2,000,000. There is a big difference, obviously, between 70,000 and 2,000,000. That's not a twofold or threefold exaggeration -- it's roughly a thirtyfold exaggeration.
The way this false estimate came into being is relatively simple: Matt Kibbe, the president of FreedomWorks, lied, claiming that ABC News had reported numbers of between 1.0 and 1.5 million when they never did anything of the sort. A few tweets later, the numbers had been exaggerated still further to 2 million. Kibbe wasn't "in error", as Malkin gently puts it. He lied. He did the equivalent of telling people that his penis is 53 inches long.
Malkin, who to her credit later corrected the error, frets that it might be used to by liberals to "discredit the undeniably massive turnout". She's right to be worried -- it absolutely will be used that way. If you don't want to be discredited, then don't, as Kibbe did, tell a ridiculous (and easily disprovable) lie.
RESPONSE (by author of this post to comment on attendance article made at a social media portal):
The photos do not lie but maybe the MSM did a little pumping up so that people who support this type of political leadership could make the counter-argument that you are making.
The truth is that the New York Times, the Washington Post and many other MSM print outlets are embargoing (not mentioning) the fact that a march ever took place. The photos confirm that one of the largest gatherings EVER in the mall at the nation's capitol took place.
Just because official estimates have been done away with through policy after the much hyped "Million Man March" (remember that socialist and race-centered fiasco? ... 200,000 at best) was such a bust, let us just half the estimate of a few broadcast MSM outlets and call it a solid million people ... and report it as a very successful protest against the policies of a One-Party rule government.
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
-
Edmund Jenks
Los Angeles, California, United States
Recommendations (31)
-
Rory Cripps
New Port Richey, Florida, United States 
Anonymous users (3)
-
Albert Milliron
Columbia, South Carolina, United States -
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke
Redwater, Alberta, Canada -
Susan Marie Kovalinsky
Ledgewood, New Jersey, United States

















Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (11)
at 14:19 on September 13th, 2009
Let me see if I understand correctly, the teabaggers lie about the size of the crowd, but it was a success with only 70,000 attending even though a news chanel gave it plenty of free advertising, but the million man march with your own number of 200,000 was a bust? And you wonder why right wingers are no longer taken seriously?
at 14:59 on September 13th, 2009
Must be blind or his little computer (or cell phone) does not have the programming to allow it to play moving pictures ... sad, really.
Must read only NYT or WaPo besides NowPublic ... because Now Public, of the three choices, actually recognizes that the event even took place!
Also, GE/NBC Universal reported that "hundreds of thousands" of people lined the mall in DC and we all know that this outfit would not want to report anything that would upset the parent company's Cap & Trade agenda.
Try looking that one up, it should be easy with a computer that actually has programming installed in it.
at 07:46 on September 14th, 2009
Even Faux did not try to claim there was over 100,000 there, and given how much they supported it with free advertising you would think they would want it to be bigger than it was. Nice lying though, you are such a good right wing nut, your handlers have taught you well.
at 19:05 on September 13th, 2009
Multiple sources claim "largest gathering ever", except they lie.Here's the ultimate source.Oh, this is SOOOOO rich!Repugnuts claim www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/09/912_demonstration_a_record_dc.html that 9/12 is a record turnout. To quote "..The truth will out. Despite mainstream media attempts to characterize turnout as in the thousands, a spokesman for the National Park Service, Dan Bana, is quoted as saying "It is a record.... We believe it is the largest event held in Washington, D.C., ever."Democrats and their media acolytes may wish this weren't so, and they may even employ the Ostrich Strategy, burying their collective heads in the sand, pretending that a major important political movement isn't happening. But they only hasten their own demise in doing so...."BUT the actual link they quote is to the BostonGlobe dated 2009-1-12 the OBAMA INAUGURATION!BWHAHAHAAA! These people can't even be smart when they LIE!!www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2009/01/22/inaugural_crowd_size_reportedly_dc_record/Looks like the Kool-aide is selling well on Faux!!
at 22:32 on September 13th, 2009
An interesting comment by a person named Bo, left at a place where this article had been re-posted:
I did something interesting, I took the place where everyone was gathered. It is about a mile to the Washington Monument to the Capitol Building.That is 5,280 feet.And it is 1/4 mile wide......that is 1,320 feet. Multiply them together and you get 6,969,600 square feet.
Now people were shoulder to shoulder the whole length and then some.But if you divide six million nine hundred sixty nine thousand and six hundred by 3 allowing a three foot clearance around people. You end up with 2,323,200 just about what some of the estimates said.
5,280
4 ÷
--------------------------
1,320 =
5,280 ×
--------------------------
6,969,600 =
3 ÷
--------------------------
2,323,200
(NOTE: Ditch the Faux ... it is soooo 2008. It is a little like Hope and Change, get it?)
at 07:43 on September 14th, 2009
I saw that same phony equation listed on Sodahead, and I must say I laugh at your suppositions. No one estimated the crowd at over 2,00,000, the only place that figure came from was the same guy who lied and said ABC had estimated the crowd at over 1,000,000. You are entitled to believe what you want, but do not pee on my leg and expect me to believe it is raining.
at 07:44 on September 14th, 2009
your math is a little fuzzy, if we allow 3 feet between people that would be 9 square feet per person for a crowd of 775,000. still a huge crowd by this estimate. using a 3x2 footprint, the crowd would be 1,120,00. more than the libtards would ever acknowledge......
at 09:14 on September 14th, 2009
Actually, that would be Bo's math, the person who left the comment. The absolute truth is that the crowd on the mall was TEAMING and way more than an early ... a very early report issued by ABC citing a DC firefighter as saying the crowd was 70,000 people, with the first comment coming at 1:23AM on 9-12-2009, a full seven hours before the event even got started.
Also, who could even count a crowd that did not even exist unless the firefighter was counting people who slept overnight so as not to miss the activities of even the most conservative estimates of a shade under one-million to at least i.5 million citizens who were not angry, just concerned that our country was being hijacked!
at 05:11 on September 15th, 2009
UPDATE:
The latest analysis of photos and videos by thr DC Department of Parks places the crowd estimate at a solid 1,7 MILLION PEOPLE who showed up to push back on the direction this One-Party leadership is taking our country.
at 11:44 on September 21st, 2009
It is just frustration for these guys who can only get 20 folks from Moveon.org to protest Wilsons office.
at 05:33 on September 23rd, 2009
Edmund Jenks,The DC Department of Parks put the figures around 70k, not 1.7 million -- that's the study done by some unknown fella at University of Illinois. I have done my own study base on a devised stationary methodology and calculation which you can find here:deathbymedia.wordpress.com/2009/09/22/912-washington-dc-tea-party-rally-crowd-estimation/It's backed by visual evidence (pictures and clips) all available in the same entry, plus determining the boundaries of the rally and calculation of the final tally derived from the density of the crowd at each given block. My calculus puts the figures around 130k up to 160k.