Abdullah Quits, Karzai Secure, US Approves:Afghanistan

by Amitjha | November 1, 2009 at 10:09 pm
85 views | 40 Recommendations | 12 comments

The voting drama seems to be ending in Kabul, former foreign minister and presidential candidate Abdullah Abdullah quit the contest, scheduled this week. This move removed the hurdle from the path of Karzai. Meanwhile White House approved the move.

President Hamid Karzai effectively secured a second term Sunday when his only challenger dropped out of the race, and the Obama administration said it was prepared to work with the man it has previously criticized to combat corruption and confront the Taliban insurgency.

President Barack Obama has been waiting for a new government in Kabul to announce whether he will send tens of thousands of new troops to Afghanistan, where the war has intensified October was the deadliest month of the eight-year war for U.S. forces. Now the country will likely be led for the next five years by a president chosen in an extremely flawed election.

Former Foreign Minister Abdullah Abdullah announced his decision to quit six days before the runoff election, after last-minute talks led by the U.S. and United Nations failed to produce a power-sharing agreement acceptable to Karzai, according to a Western diplomat who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the negotiations.

In an emotional speech, Abdullah told supporters that he could not accept an runoff led by the same Karzai-appointed election commission that managed the fraud-marred vote in August. The runoff was set for Nov. 7 after U.N.-backed auditors annulled nearly a third of Karzai's votes as fakes.

"I will not participate in the Nov. 7 election," Abdullah said, because a "transparent election is not possible."

The Obama administration, which had been critical of Karzai's leadership, appeared to accept the outcome.

Senior Obama adviser David Axelrod said most polls showed Abdullah would have lost the runoff anyway "so we are going to deal with the government that is there."

"And obviously there are issues we need to discuss, such as reducing the high level of corruption," Axelrod said on "Face the Nation." "These are issues we'll take up with President Karzai."

recommend Add a comment
1
René

seems like a bogus reason to quit.


something else is involved here.


2
Amitjha

Your apprehension is very close to reality, it is dirty world of politics.

1
albertacowpoke

This was also the point of view of Hillary Clinton.  She stated (paraphrased) that since Karzai had agreed to the run-off that it legitimized him.  The election committee has now cancelled the Nov 7th run-off election.  There are apparently still talks to include Abdullah Abdullah in power sharing, however neither him nor Karzai no longer have any interest in this.  Karzai has now been confirmed to be President. 

There will be a cloud on Karzai's presidency though. 


1
Amitjha

Political Analyst say that, Abdullah's exclusion will make situation more worse. Well Karzai is doing well, but playing with the democratic process should not be pardoned. He must ask for fresh mandate.

3
nanute

Did Karzai offer him a piece of the opium trade? This will make the US position much more difficult if the majority of Afghans do see Karzai's government as legitimate. Stand by.

0
albertacowpoke

nanute  There will no doubt be fallout over this, both in Afghanistan and with the American public.  If nothing else, this election illustrated the difficulties that exist in forming a legitimate government.  Power  sharing might have been a much better solution to this problem.

0
nanute

So maybe Obam's waiting to make a decision doesn't look like dithering after all? This is not a good development as you say, for either side. Might just be the catalyst to get the hell out, politics aside.

2
albertacowpoke

Karzai declared President

0
Hugh Askew

Not a good development.

If Abdullah starts up his own merry band of brigands, it could be real bad.

0
Paschen

No point running if the elections may be rigged is the message given by Abdullah.

0
jefhow22

This is not a positive step for the West or Afghanistan... I agree HA that this will lead to a Separatist government and will put our troops directly in the cross-hairs of an even more destabilized situation...I am sure the "O" is jumping foot to foot with glee that, in his mind, this is finally over....but it surely is NOT over...

0
snuffysmith

Commentaries And Analysis

Nation-state Nonstarter -- Arnaud de Borchgrave, Washington Times opinion
With Karzai, US Faces Weak Partner in Time of War -- David E. Sanger, New York Times
The Real Afghan Strategy -- David Ignatius, Washington Post opinion
McChrystal Lite -- Tom Donnelly and Tim Sullivan, Weekly Standard opinion
We need to understand what we mean by the word 'Taliban' -- The Independent
Afghanistan's drug war: The farmers aren't the enemy -- L.A. Times opinion

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

René
First Flagged at 11:13 PM, Nov 1, 2009 by René

Related Stories

Recommendations (40)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from