NP Rank:
Advertisers Face Hurdles on Social Networking Sites
It is interesting that FACEBOOK refuses to make their position on advertising revenues public, because the company is privately owned. Remember, it was set up originally with the help of former CIA and DoD execs., so I'd say the agenda isn't entirely about making profits from advertising.–For interest, see an earlier post re. who owns FACEBOOK here on Now Public.–
Advertisers Face Hurdles on Social Networking Sites–
By RANDALL STROSS
December 13, 2008
FOR some time, Procter & Gamble, the world’s largest advertiser, has been dipping its big toes into the vast pool of Facebook, now the world’s largest social network. I recently knocked on the doors of both companies to hear how the experiment was going. Neither was inclined to say much.Independent experts on Web advertising have been watching, however, and what they see is a myriad of difficulties in making brand advertising work on social networking sites. Members of social networks want to spend time with friends, not brands.
When major brands place banner advertisements on the side of a member’s home page, they pay inexpensive prices, but the ads receive little attention. Seth Goldstein, co-founder of SocialMedia Networks, an online advertising company, wrote on his Facebook blog that a banner ad “is universally disregarded as irrelevant if it’s not ignored entirely.”
When advertisers invite members to come to pages dedicated to their products, they can attract visitors only by investing in expensive creative material or old-fashioned promotions like prize contests.
And when they try to take advantage of new “social advertising,” extending their commercial message to a member’s friends, their ads will be noticed, all right, but not necessarily favorably. Members are understandably reluctant to become shills. IDC, the technology research firm, published a study last month that reported that just 3 percent of Internet users in the United States would willingly let publishers use their friends for advertising. The report described social advertising as “stillborn.”ll Web sites that rely on ads struggle to a greater or lesser extent to convert traffic, even high traffic, into meaningful revenue. Ads that run on Google and other search engines are a profitable exception because their visitors are often in a buying mood. Other kinds of sites, however, can’t deliver similar visitors to advertisers. Google’s own YouTube, which relies heavily, like Facebook, on user-generated content, remains a costly experiment in the high-traffic, low-revenue ad business.
Financial data would show the current state of Facebook’s advertising, but none are available. Facebook is privately held and a spokesman told me that it does not disclose revenue or any information about its ad sales.
Crowd Power
-
Maireid Sullivan
Melbourne, Australia
Recommendations (17)
-
Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan -
RoryKearney
Voorhees, New Jersey, United States -
amyjudd
Vancouver, Canada




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (5)
at 17:59 on December 17th, 2008
I can totally see what they are saying here - it's so difficult to advertise on any site that has a large customer base and is more about social networking than anything else - you would think facebook would have it easier, but I suppose not...
at 21:54 on December 17th, 2008
In all my years scouring the web, I don't think I've ever actually looked at an ad. I've noticed, especially after the US Presidential campaign, that advertisers are using clever and expensive looking short films to deliver their message via viral marketing.
at 23:38 on December 17th, 2008
You don't have to click on a link to be indoctrinated with a product. We are victims of subliminal affectation.
Thanks for the info on the founders of facebook. I had no idea.
at 16:24 on December 18th, 2008
As the song says, "I want to do right, but not right now".
Yes, its all about recognition!
I rarely watch tv (we're movie buffs)- but the other night I watched, and saw an ad for a NEW house cleaning liquid that promises to get rid of dirt and germs in one fell swoop. I thought that would be great. So I went to the shop next day, and looked at the cleaning product shelves - all full, except that new brand. Only a couple left. So the ads do work. But I read the ingredients and it is one of those total toxic products! I just couldn't bring myself to use those poisons. Right next to it was one that used natural ingredients. I bought it and it works really well and is 100% safe for environment and people. People still aren't reading the ingredients listings, they are following the tv ads. We MUST get over the urge to do it even tho' it is bad for health and habitat. We have choices now.
I recommend the little pocket book, "The Chemical Maze" because it lists and simply explains all ingredients.
at 23:41 on December 17th, 2008
Good Post. Great Info.