NP Rank:
AFA Calls To Stone Killer Whale Tilikum For Drowning Trainer
The American Family Association calls for killer whale Tilikum to be stoned after tragedy involving trainer Dawn Brancheau
Tilikum, the killer whale that drowned its trainer Dawn Brancheau, is an object of heated discussion. The whale will stay away from performances after the tragedy, but it now remains to be decided what the animal's fate will be. The American Family Association, a conservative Christian organization, calls for the whale to be stoned. It says the Scripture says, ""When an ox gores a man or woman to death, the ox shall be stoned, and its flesh shall not be eaten, but the owner shall not be liable." (Exodus 21:28)" Moreover, the AFA says the Scripture also lays blame on the curator at SeaWorld because the whale was not put down after previous incidents that involved killings.
Meanwhile, some experts say the whale should be set free because it is likely to re-offend. However, SeaWorld maintains that the best place for Tilikum is in his pool. The water park resumed its killer whale shows on February 27, three days after the tragedy.
The Incident
On February 24, Tilikum killed its trainer Dawn Brancheau when he dragged her underwater and thrashed her body around during one of the shows as horrified audience looked on. The whale killed before - in 1991, Tilikum dragged a marine biology student who fell into its tank. In 1999, a man sneaked into Tilikum's enclosure. His body was found in the pool the next day.
The SeaWorld is currently investigating why the trainer came in such close contact with the whale when the rules demand that trainers maintain adequate distance from the animals. It appears Brancheau was dragged out from the partially submerged ledge.
NowPublic on Facebook
Most Recommended Comment
Recommendations (18)
-
Pat Garcia
La Paz, Mexico -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
Hugh Askew
Omaha, Nebraska, United States -
Susan Marie Kovalinsky
Ledgewood, New Jersey, United States -
Amy Judd
Vancouver, Canada



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (32)
at 13:45 on March 3rd, 2010
I think this is a fantastic idea and I can't think of anybody better than the good folks at the AFA to carry it out. Of course, whale blubber is very thick so they will have to be very close to the whale to be effective with the stones. With this in mind, I would suggest the actually get in the tank with the Orca so they can execute a clean and effective stoning of the animal. :D
at 14:59 on March 3rd, 2010
hahaha you win the internets
at 21:57 on March 4th, 2010
Quite right, Les. I'm in total agreement with you, although it's going to take a while before they can execute the animal, of course. Someone is going to first have to sew a burka big enough for the 12,000 beast to wear to its stoning. I suggest the polygamist mormons in lower Utah take on this task. They're good at sewing large garments. Meantime, why don't we feed the rabidly anti-gay but--oops--newly outed gay state senator from California to the whale as its last meal? I think that's in the bible someplace, is it not? I'm so glad we've got it all cleared up now that the United States of America are ruled by ancient Judaic scriptures. All this time I was under the misapprehension that you Americans were governed by a secular constitution written a mere 220 years ago. It's such a relief to know that instead you're a Theocracy run by righteous Puritans quoting Leviticus who have no hesitation in slaying a vulgar, bloated and murderous beast. So when are they taking Mr. Cheney to the quarry?
at 06:33 on March 14th, 2010
You are sick siding with the AFA Whats the point in killing tilikum when it not going to make a difference. Anyways dunno y you have to make such a comment didnt even affect you at all
at 14:25 on March 3rd, 2010
i am writing this cos i think that the whale should not be killed cos its a wild animal and should not have been in a tank. it is a very horrible thing that happend and i really feel for the family of the trainer. but he belongs in the sea. and i have read research that keeping whales this size in tanks has a lot of pyscological damage on them and so i think it should be in the best interest of the whale to try and rehabilitated it back to the wild cos it did not have the option to be captured..
at 06:40 on March 14th, 2010
You are right it may have pyscological damage but he cnt be put into the wild for many reasons 1 he has no teeth so he cnt eat without keepers making sure nothing gets caught2 he spends a lot of his time on the surface where in the wild they spend most of their time swimming3 He is very use to captive life like bein fed and bein social with otheres in the wild he would not survive don't just go onto the internet and think you know everything
at 06:43 on March 14th, 2010
You are right it may have pyscological damage but he cnt be put into the wild for many reasons 1 he has no teeth so he cnt eat without keepers making sure nothing gets caught2 he spends a lot of his time on the surface where in the wild they spend most of their time swimming3 He is very use to captive life like bein fed and bein social with otheres in the wild he would not survive don't just go onto the internet and think you know everything
at 14:35 on March 3rd, 2010
wait wait wait this is a christian group saying to kill Tilly r u fucking serious first of all its a damn wild animal yes i said WILD.
at 15:00 on March 3rd, 2010
I don't believe that a true Christian organization would want to stone Telly. That's not the way Christians act - Christ was the example and He didn't act with voilence. Christians don't stone people - in fact, it was the Christians being stoned (for being Christians). And as for Telly, its us humans' fault for using those poor orcas for our entertainment. I don't think God intended for it to be so.
at 15:05 on March 3rd, 2010
In all fairness, if a dog kills a person, they are always put down. Think they do they same with elephants and big cats in zoos and circuses, don't they?
Absolutely guarantee that there isn't any land mammal that would be allowed to live after killing more than one person.
at 22:04 on March 4th, 2010
Hugh, you're quite right. I think the secret is in the price tag. The law now forbids taking Orcas from the wild to put them into captivity, so the only ones allowed in captivity have to be bred in captivity. Tilly is a breeder. What's more, each Orca in captivity is worth $2 million. I think these facts clear up all confusion about why the mischievous pony tail grabbing beastie is still alive and well. Sadly, kept in a tank like that and unable to communicate properly, the poor animal is really in a living hell. A lesser punishment would be execution, in fact. That's the dirty little secret of "Sea World."
at 22:17 on March 4th, 2010
My dear boy, you've got it right again! But let me tell you why this is so. The secret is not in the water versus the land. It's in the fact that United States law forbids the taking of orcas from the ocean into captivity. Only orcas born in captivity can now be kept by these ocean parks and so-called sea worlds. Consequently, each orca is now worth $2 million (US). And on top of that, Tilly is a breeder, which makes him even more valuable. The reason he is alive is nothing more than dollar bills, by dear lad, many, many dollar bills. Welcome to the sad world we live in! Quite pathetic, isn't it? As Shakespeare wrote: "When we are born we cry that we are come to this great stage of fools."
at 19:34 on March 3rd, 2010
Tilly should be set free. Then if Tilly is murderous, we can send the japanese after it.Orcas aren't dumb animals, they're thinking intelligent people. Maybe not as high an IQ as the average human but there's humans with considerably less intellect and they are afforded rights within their capacity to exercise them. So too should the whales of the world. Orca pods recognize lost members even after decades away when they're returned to the ocean. Who would refuse to rehab a POW from overseas after 20 yrs in captivity?
at 22:19 on March 3rd, 2010
I think that the AFA is being a little dramatic. I think that sea world and other animal exhibits should be closed down. Free the orca back into the wild. If the AFA wants to talk about scripture how about going to Genesis and reading the first chapter, everything had a place to be in i.e. whales were placed by God into the ocean because thats where he wanted them not in large fish tanks and used for adam and eve's amusement. Get a grip AFA!
at 00:23 on March 4th, 2010
plain and simple- why keep the whale at seaworld when he is just gonna kill more people? either set him free [ which is the right thing to do] or put him down. but dont freaking keep him there. cause its not safe for the trainers.
at 08:24 on March 4th, 2010
Everybody Must Get StonedCheck out this link about this whale stoning. If you think this is a new idea, see the link where an elephant was hung in 1916 in Tennessee (of course). Photos includednineteen80snore.com/2010/03/04/everybody-must-get-stoned/
at 08:25 on March 4th, 2010
link again of Elephant hanging in 1916nineteen80snore.com/2010/03/04/everybody-must-get-stoned/
at 09:50 on March 4th, 2010
Of course, it's nice to see a fundie group acknowledging the evolutionary link between oxen and whales
at 11:49 on March 4th, 2010
In regards to this topic, The 21st chapter of Exodus states that if an OX kills a woman it is to be stoned to death. This is a Jewish punishment which does NOT fall under the category of Moral law. Since this... See More is not a ceremonial law it by default is classified as a civil law. Since the government was a theocracy and run by God and the "priests" for lack of a better word this is something that was strictly enforced. While an OX is clearly NOT a whale I can see how this scripture is twisted to fit the circumstance. This alone is NOT the unreasonable portion of the issue. The unreasonable portion of this issue is that Jesus abolished the ceremonial and civil laws but told all Christians we are to continue obeying the moral laws. We don't have to KILL women who prostitute anymore or wear those little hats but as Christians we are expected to do laws morally fundamental ( ie: 10 commandments along with others from Lev ) In summery, any Xtian who believes we should stone this whale should be stoned if they ever had sex before marriage or had sex ( in any form ) during their period. Once the government hacks a few heads off in the street for example I bet the AFA shuts the heck up.....lol
at 23:52 on March 4th, 2010
EYE FOR AN EYE ! Let´s DROWN the mofo !
at 02:04 on March 5th, 2010
***ERROR***I was so upset when I originally heard that there was a call to stone the whale. and my thoughts mimicked those of your initial responders. Almost word for word I agreed with the post that said, "let them get close and go ahead and give it a shot". I feel that I made my decision too quickly. When I did a search and found the original article, I noticed that he did not call for the animal to be stoned, he merely mentioned the scripture that dealt with the issue. There is nothing wrong in quoting scripture. There is something wrong in inciting violence against animals in the way that the NOWPUBLIC post suggests. "AFA CALLS TO STONE KILLER WHALE". There was no call made, no siren sounded, there was merely a mention of scripture, saying that if it had been followed this recent tragic event would not have occurred. While he mentions how things would have been in the "good ol' days', I don't think he in anyway meant to call for a stoning, and think that leap was made by NowPublic.It is important not to amplify these instances, it is irresponsible journalism to make that assumption. I don't agree with the literal translation of the bible, and my own personal opinion is that you must treat people fairly, not assume they think something. In doing so NowPublic attempts to become some sort of anger-spewing pundit serving to make people angry and not to solve problems, or incite useful discourse.Matt
at 03:02 on March 5th, 2010
I am so disappointed in everyone that has suggested a stoning of the whale or any animal for that matter should occur. It is barbaric and disgusting. Animals often function off instinct and it's not in any way the whales fault. Whales are wild animals and if kept in a marine park, should be respected. I don't suggest for a second the trainer deserved to die and it was a terrible event. But I am certain she would not want the whale to be harmed in anyway. As a christian myself I am disgusted to be associated with a group that would even suggest the killing of an animal in anyway other than as quick and painless as possible. I can only hope people come to their senses!
at 13:31 on March 5th, 2010
yeah, i don't think you could stone a whale to death. it is a very big animal and i bet there arms aren't strong enough to throw a rock that hard. those rocks would probably also need to be the size of boulders
at 14:33 on March 5th, 2010
WE KILL COUNTLESS OF INNOCENT ANIMALS/MAMALS EACH YEAR AND ONE HUMAN DIES AND WE ARE ALL UP IN ARMS? EYE FOR AN EYE? WE ALL SHOULD WATCH OUR BACKS!
at 15:01 on March 5th, 2010
After all the sushi we eat, is it any wonder that the universe rises up and has a killer whale eat a human? == balance in all things!
at 22:17 on March 5th, 2010
They call the killer whales for a reason. Otherwise they would call them "cute, cuddly, fluffy, snuggle whales."
at 08:53 on March 6th, 2010
i want to agree with what coach brice williams said as far as how we are to obey God's moral laws and the old testament ceremonial type laws (like the animal sacrifices and the stonings)....well Christ freed us from those old laws on the cross. so it's a matter of moral laws. as a christian, i am *appaulled* at the suffering these animals have gone through, i am appaulled that someone would suggest stoning these creatures!! i am not at all suprised that this terrible death of the trainer has happened. the whale has natural, God-given instincts to be a predator. God put the sweet animal where he wanted the animal to live (the ocean) and then humans selfishly ripped that animal from his home to force him to perform.
at 14:44 on March 8th, 2010
This furor comes from a misuse of an ancient law, from the Book of Exodus. In those days, the ancient Hebrews lived close together , for protection from marauding tribes, in agricultural villages. They kept their farm animals in their family living quarters, goats, sheep, cows,donkeys, horses, camels, oxen etc. Their law demanding the death of an animal that killed or injured a person was sensible for that time and place. Farm animals were very valuable, even more so than today, and this law ensured that people would keep their animals under strict control. Such close living made problems that had to be dealt with; an ox goes mad after smelling the blood of a goat slaughtered two houses away. A camel kicks somebody, children tease a donkey to make it buck and hee-haw, and of course, dog bites. I certainly can understand why many people might think that Tilikum, the orca who caused the death of his trainer Dawn Brancheau, or Montefiore, the tiger who bit his trainer Roy Horn, ought to be euthanized. But these people loved their animals as much in death as in life, and so in accordance with their probable wishes, these killings will not take place. If unruly farm animals as well as adulteresses, were to be stoned to death back in ancient times, remember that Jesus intervened to save the life of such a woman. To follow his example, let us assume that He would not want the animals to be killed as well.
at 14:54 on March 10th, 2010
I just can't shake the feeling that this whale knows what it did and is secretly laughing about it (or doing whatever whales do in place of gloating) because it knows that our human sentimentality will keep us from inflicting righteous vengeance upon it. Some animals, like some people, are just murderous "bad seeds" who delight in mayhem and murder. An intelligent creature, as this whale is defended as being, wouldn't lash out in a sort of tantrum and slaughter a person who cared for it. It would have found some other way to communicate its suffering or displeasure. This whale deserves death, maybe by a grenade stuffed into a fish it's fed, a cyanide-tipped torpedo fired by a mini-sub, or maybe a (particularly-appropriate) ritual slaughter by Inuit hunters.
at 22:58 on March 12th, 2010
the stoning in those times were not as you think...they did not throw stones at people to kill them. they would put stones on top of them, thus crushing the rib cage and preventing blood flow from the heart, and ventilation in the lungs. the whale should not be harmed. people make the decisions to train them, and they know the risks. it was unfortunate what happened. that whale may not be the nicest whale such as keiko, whom yearned for human attention and affection, by proving so upon his release into the waters in iceland. he then swam to norway, where he enjoyed interacting with people, even letting them ride him; although the government did not like that. unfortunately he died short after his arrival in norway, from pneumonia. however, not all whales are killers, despite their name.