All European Life Died In Auschwitz

by Barry Artiste | August 29, 2009 at 03:42 am

545 views | 36 Recommendations | 30 comments

Barry Artiste Op/Ed

The Spanish news seem to hit the nail on the head when comparing the eradication of Jews in Europe to what is going on in the Middle East by Muslim Extremists, Taliban etc. Though the World unfairly lumped all Germans in the complicity of killing 6 million jews, one should not be quick to judge all Muslims as Extremists in eradicating the West and Israel! Though a peaceful and workable solution in all this needs to be found, a final solution by the Taliban is certainly not the answer as History repeats itself once more it seems.

Caminaba por la Rambla del Raval (Barcelona) y lo vi claro:

"La verdad no se casa con nadie" (refrán español)

Nosotros asesinamos a 6 millones de judíos, para acabar importando 20 millones de musulmanes por lo común integristas.

¿Qué no es posible generalizar? Bien, en vista de como nos han ido las cosas yo creo que sí se puede generalizar. ¿Qué si hay excepciones? De acuerdo… pero son excepciones.

The translation of this News story above is provided below on this news story.

All European Life Died In Auschwitz

By Sebastian Vivar Rodriguez - Spanish Writer,

I walked down the street in Barcelona, and suddenly discovered a terrible truth – Europe died in Auschwitz. We killed six million Jews and replaced them with 20 million Muslims.

In Auschwitz we burned a culture, thought, creativity, talent. We destroyed the chosen people, truly chosen, because they produced great and wonderful people who changed the world.

The contribution of this people is felt in all areas of life: science, art, international trade, and above all, as the conscience of the world. These are the people we burned. And under the pretence of tolerance, and because we wanted to prove to ourselves that we were cured of the disease of racism, we opened our gates to 20 million Muslims, who brought us stupidity and ignorance, religious extremism and lack of tolerance, crime and poverty due to an unwillingness to work and support their families with pride.

They have turned our beautiful Spanish cities into the third world, drowning in filth and crime. Shut up in the apartments they receive free from the government, they plan the murder and destruction of their naive native hosts. And thus, in our misery, we have exchanged culture for fanatical hatred, creative skill for destructive skill, intelligence for backwardness and superstition.

We have exchanged the pursuit of peace of the Jews of Europe and their talent for hoping for a better future for their children, their determined clinging to life because life is holy, for those who pursue death, for people consumed by the desire for death for themselves and others, for our children and theirs.

What a terrible mistake was made by miserable Europe. * This is a free translation of an article reportedly first published in a Spanish newspaper (original article in Spanish). The editor of this site could not confirm the name of the author. A variant of the name is Sebastian Villar Rodriguez. The author's name appears to be a pseudonym, apparently to avoid attack by Arabs.

0 See all footage | View Slideshow

Share: email story | add to any | | facebook | stumbleupon

recommend This comment thread is now closed

albertacowpoke

at 03:47 on August 29th, 2009

An interesting way of looking at things.

Barry Artiste

at 03:54 on August 29th, 2009

Thanks ABCP

jazzyzazzy

at 04:19 on August 29th, 2009

Revealing.!...................

Roy C

at 06:15 on August 29th, 2009

Hungarian Jewish culture was one of the germs of European culture that got destroyed. Some got transferred to the US where the music, for example, was one of the stimuli that created big band music.

rng

at 06:50 on August 29th, 2009

Hungarian Jewish culture was one of the germs of European culture

I think you meant gems, so you might want to edit it

Roy C

at 06:58 on August 29th, 2009

No, rng, I meant GEMS. GEMS, as in something magnificent.

rng

at 07:11 on August 29th, 2009

I think you meant gems, so you might want to edit it

Err, calm down, that is what I said

Rory Cripps

at 06:16 on August 29th, 2009

The name was changed to protect the innocent.

It's refreshing to read something that's not watered down with political correctness. Particularly the use of the term "Muslim extremists". After all, the extremists themselves are the first to admit that they're conducting their extremism in the name of their religion. Hitler didn't even do that.

Roy C

at 06:21 on August 29th, 2009

The Europeans, idealists fully gripped by their "superiority", fail to grasp what it is about them that created fascism and communism- their idealism.

They cloak their evil in their idealism and the disease is growing rapidly here as well.

rng

at 06:49 on August 29th, 2009

The Europeans, idealists fully gripped by their "superiority", fail to grasp what it is about them that created fascism and communism- their idealism. They cloak their evil in their idealism and the disease is growing rapidly here as well

Europeans are evil? Are you serious?

As to the original article, if you invert the races it is the same sort of hate thinking that caused the Holocaust. It is also erroneous logic to assume you can make any conclusion about a whole ethnic group by limited observance of a few. I have seen quite a few fat, lazy and stupid American but I would never draw the conclusion that they are all that way. Any reasoning that lumps millions of people with a single behavioral trait is flawed. When it is done to indicate a negative trait of the whole ethnic group , it is racism

Rory Cripps

at 07:08 on August 29th, 2009

I have seen quite a few fat, lazy and stupid American but I would never draw the conclusion that they are all that way.

Rng: A lot of Americans are! LOL! I think many in the western world are not quite certain as to the level of support that the Muslim world has for extremists within their ranks.In other words, how many throughout the Muslim world support terrorists . . . 10%, 20%? I know that here in America there are Muslim organizations, such as CAIR, that are ready to sue anyone at the drop of a hat that questions their motives and obvious support of terrorist organizations.

rng

at 07:23 on August 29th, 2009

There was some interesting work done on this by Gallup. Browse around some of the findings here http://www.gallup.com/consulting/worldpoll/26410/gallup-center-muslim-studies.aspx. You have to scroll down the page and open the PDF's as they are naturally protective of their IP.

Religiosity is often a cloak, nor is poverty necessary the cause of terrorism per Prof Aberdie's work http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~aabadie/povterr.pdf

Professor Abadie’s research, using different data sets and sources, corresponds with the findings of the Gallup poll that the most radicalized population sectors within the Muslim world are better educated and have higher income than the average. The radicalization is not driven therefore from ignorance or religious dogma, but actually by a desire for political and sovereign actualization, including democratic self-determination.

Roy C

at 07:02 on August 29th, 2009

If I had said "Americans", I would get an agreement from you.

Yes, there is an idealist streak in European culture that derives from Platonic idealism and narcissism and created the Church, and Marxism and Fascism as well.

The GERM, in this case, of Europe's evil is this elitist culture and consequent narcissism. Jung talks about it as well. And, we, as heirs of European culture, have our share of the disease of idealism as well.

I am European of origin, mother and three grandparents all immigrants. I know what I am talking about from observing them and from living there for a decade.

rng

at 07:14 on August 29th, 2009

Okay then Roy, you go with the line that European are evil, I just don't think you'll get much traction with it as a concept in the broader world

Roy C

at 07:19 on August 29th, 2009

I didn't say that all Europeans were evil. I said that they cloak their evil in their idealism. I know many good Europeans because I lived there for a long time, but the peace that has been in place for fifty years and counting was imposed by us. As soon as the Soviet end of the imposition fell, the Europeans went right back to war.

European basically ran the world for four hundred years because they had the most power and the most capacity to project it.

And, they are responsible for a lot of good, but if you ask them about their war-like tendencies, they will deny them and if you ask them how it is that the people of the Renaissance and the Enlightenment killed a hundred million people in the name of Marxism and the Mussolini-invented "national socialism", they never have an answer. Never.

But, Jung, a European himself, did: idealism

rng

at 07:26 on August 29th, 2009

I said that they cloak their evil in their idealism

If someone is cloaking their evil, then they are evil but just hiding it. Now, idealism is evil too. Wow!

Is there anything non-America that can earn the seal of approval then?

Grace H

at 09:06 on August 29th, 2009

In the name of Marxism? You are joking right. What they had was the anti-thesis or Marxism. We kill people in the name of saving Capitalism too. I belive pople in the Renaissance were killed by the Inquisition in the name of God.

Furthermore, considering Marx lived in the 1800's I doubt his philosphies led to anyone's death during the Renassaince or the Enlightenment. Lol.

Roy C

at 09:31 on August 29th, 2009

LOL, you read too fast, there, "Grace". Europeans are the people of the Enlightenment, which gave birth to the US conception of fundamental rights. How did these people get so twisted so that they ended up backing systems of barbarity such as Marxism and Fascism is the question.

Marxism led to Marxist-Leninism, a police state application of Marxism, a Marxism imposed on unwilling people by a communist party that has substituted itself in the Marxist equation of history for the proletariat, as the central committee substituted itself for the party and Lenin, substituting himself for the central committee became the de facto czar/emperor/king/monarch of all Russia.

The Enlightenment led to the US constitution and you missed my point, very, very much, Miss "LOL", which is just my reaction here to your post. How much we seem to be enjoying each other's misinterpretations.

Marxism is an attempt to come up with a "scientific" view of history and economics, that would a cure for "alienation". It didn't work and it is clearly based on idealism.

Fascism, invented by ex-socialist Mussolini and taken up by ex-communist Adolf Hitler, had everything to do with Marxism as it was the aspect of history that was not predicted by Marxism, rendering it pretense of historic scientific analysis as bunk.

Everyone kills people in the name of their "-ism". That is what "idealism" is about. Full inflation and self-exaltation from thinking you own the truth and the right to impose it "by any means necessary".

So, there, Miss LOL, "Grace", fascism, a form of idealist socialism based on national identity was created by the reaction to the excesses of Marxist-Leninism.

You can even find Lenin writing his objections to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, so sure he was that everything you needed to know about philosophy and physics was already in Marxism.

Grace H

at 09:45 on August 29th, 2009

Hmmm. Its possible, but the wording does not lend to clarity... But what they did is not representative of Marxism. Its a utopian idealism, so it most likely will never be set up.

rng

at 10:01 on August 29th, 2009

Fascism, invented by ex-socialist Mussolini and taken up by ex-communist Adolf Hitler, had everything to do with Marxism..

Hmm...a little bit of interpretative license there. Fascists are first and foremost nationalists, often also obsessed with race. They reject the collectivism of communism and the individualism of capitalism It grew out of a rejection of both systems.

QueensHart

at 07:29 on August 29th, 2009

Actually only 50 % of the world will bother to look inside and understand why and how they perceive.That is my guess.. Jung said a long time ago 40% is mentally ill...so that means today it could be 60%?

We can go to the moon but very few will look inside.

Roy C

at 08:43 on August 29th, 2009

Here you go! Some nice, fresh, anti-Semitic lies, and right out of European newspapers.

The Hebrew Scripture is replete with passages of unforgettable beauty, and many of the most beautiful are to be found in the Book of Psalms. Psalm 119, the longest in the book, is studded with such pearls, in particular verses 103-05, which read (in the King James translation):

How sweet are thy words unto my taste! Yea, sweeter than honey to my mouth! Through thy precepts I get understanding: therefore I hate every false way. Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path.

These words resonate ironically today, when the words one hears and reads everywhere around us about Jews, about Zionists, and about the state of Israel are not “sweet” but sharp and bitter. The “precepts” we receive in the various media, print and electronic, do not promote “understanding” but seem instead to justify “every false way.” The biblical “lamp” seems to have been extinguished and the “path” is shrouded in darkness.

The most recent case in point comes from the left-leaning Swedish tabloid Aftonbladet, which reported in a double-truck spread on August 18, 2009, that Israeli soldiers regularly abduct Palestinians to harvest their innards for the international organ trade. (This is the same daily that, on Easter 2003, referred to “the crucifixion of Arafat.”) The source for this ludicrous fable consists of a number of Palestinians whose depositions are accepted as gospel. How Swede are their words! The story now comes full circle back to its Palestinian source to be confirmed by the Palestinian news agency Ma’an (which is, incidentally, financed by Denmark and Holland). The feature cites a certain “expert” whose evidence for the claim consists of a rather peculiar factoid, namely, that Israel returns the bodies of Hezbollah fighters minus their organs! The obvious question remains unasked: why would Israel send back these scavenged bodies if it wished to avoid detection and avert a scandal? The absurdity is palpable, but logic and common sense are clearly beyond the cognitive abilities of anti-Semites. And then, as we know, there is the inconvenient medical fact that the organs of people who do not expire under clinical conditions, when organs can be removed immediately, are not viable for transplant.

Anyone who is even remotely familiar with the Palestinian propaganda machine and the robust anti-Semitism of the Swedish media and officialdom (not to mention Norway, Spain, the UK, and several other European countries) might consult another verse from Psalm 119: “The wicked have laid a snare for me.” And indeed they have. The most popular Dutch newspaper, De Telegraaf, cleared the way for its Swedish counterpart to launch its newest calumny, publishing an article on August 8, 2009, accusing Jews of creating swine flu as part of a pharmaceutical conspiracy to profit from the sale of antidotes.

The despicable lies perpetrated by Aftonbladet and De Telegraaf are only the latest in what seems like an endless chain of defamatory utterances and slanderous fictions about the Jewish people and the Jewish state. We recall the notorious Mohammed al-Durah hoax, in which the Palestinian 12-year-old was ostensibly shot by the IDF (Israel Defense Forces) at the Netzarim junction in Gaza on September 30, 2000, propagated by the France TV 2 network and picked up by every major news outlet on the planet. We now know that the episode was rehearsed, directed, and staged with the collusion of Palestinian stringers and cameramen. It constitutes perhaps the most conspicuous contemporary chapter in the never-ending and constantly mutating hate-campaign against the Jewish people.

Then we had the so-called Jenin massacre, which turned out to be anything but, except for the 22 young Israeli soldiers who died trying to avoid civilian casualties when an American-style air strike would have done the job of scrubbing out the terrorist nest. Next, the blame for the 2006 Lebanon war was laid at Israel’s doorstep although the conflict was triggered by the Hezbollah incursion into Israeli territory, resulting in the kidnapping and killing of several Israeli soldiers. Britain’s Independent went so far as to accuse Israel of using uranium-tipped weapons, a claim so manifestly outrageous it defies both reason and belief — and should rightly have defied publication.

rng

at 10:00 on August 29th, 2009

Press excitement and inaccuracy is hardly confined to the European media, so your point is moot. You think it isn't evidenced here, there and everywhere else?

Roy C

at 10:26 on August 29th, 2009

Well, you would think that the people who set up the Holocaust by active or passive participation were not going to repeat anti-Jewish lies, wouldn't you?

But, the lies are back.

"Inaccuracy" is itself a lie. "Inaccuracy" describes a relatively honest mistake, one of quantity, rather then one of fact.

Here the "inaccuracy" is a blatant attempt to further hatred. All well-informed people already know about these lies and, if you didn't, you would be obligated to validate the information before printing it since it is such a scathing accusation.

So, "inaccuracy" is inaccurate, and, worse, a buffer against conscience, a defense mechanism.

rng

at 11:48 on August 29th, 2009

Well, you would think that the people who set up the Holocaust by active or passive participation were not going to repeat anti-Jewish lies, wouldn't you?

That's abut as logical as saying that American as slave owners in the past will still be racist now...no...wait.

Roy you accuse everyone else of evil, narcissism and idealism but then present a rigid, race-sex absolutists, and pre-formulated world view. The same value set dictates your position on every issue. Can't you even recognize the irony of what you say?

The_Cynic

at 10:08 on August 29th, 2009

Europeans are pro-war!? How that assumption is made I have no idea!

The only people I have met that are pro-war are those who still believe in the inalienable right of imperialism - and they are on the right, certainly not on the left or even liberal left.

If people insist on looking at Marxism as the USSR then there cannot be any debate, because the premise is flawed before the debate begins.

As for the Muslim situation I would look to those Muslims who fought the Japanese during WWII, ask them about war.

Is there a problem with certain Muslims and Islamic thinking - well, yeah! Yet all Muslims are not Islamists - ask those who survived the London bombings, there question was "Why? This isn't the Quran I read."

If we are going to throw out dubious arguments of whom is the worst - and utilise history to back our argument up, which part of history do you wish to start in?

The Pharaohs or the Land grab of Lincoln? The Renaissance or Mao? WWI or the Ottoman Empire?

History is stained with the blood of both rich and poor, all in the name of money and power - that is what we have to adjust, it's just we have not grown up enough to understand that - yet.

Roy C

at 10:38 on August 29th, 2009

No, not pro-war per se, but, given the history of recent conflict in Europe, they are not anti-war or perhaps we should say that for being "anti-war", they had started the worst in the history of humanity.

The problem is that idealism, the exaltation of one ideal at the expense of its necessary complement, is at the root cause of strife. And the Europeans are very much idealists and those wars derived from that idealism

Now their idealism has pushed them to create a society where, for example, 30% of German women have no children.

In effect, they have chosen to destroy their future. Their older people will have to work, and the European continent will gradually lose its "indigenous" people and its culture as well.

The_Cynic

at 11:15 on August 29th, 2009

30% of German women have no children.

You will have to give me some context as to why that is relevant to idealism, Roy.

The history of both wars can be read - yet, if we look at WWI with an open mind that was the last hot war of the imperial age. You also have to look at the whole structure of European society at the time. 2nd or early 3rd stage industrial revolution. Horses were still used in the beginnings of that war as both transport and war machine, plus the tactics of war then was very much Nepolionic.

It was called the Great War, or the war to end all wars, not great because it was a good fight to the death but because so many died during it.

The second world war was fought against fascism, with, I may add, Britain being left to fight that war on her own for a significant period of time. Britain didn't want that war - Hitler pushed, and pushed until there was no option - and the people knew that, as did the USSR once Nazi-Germany turned the focus there.The USSR didn't want war either - one side did.

Whether you call that idealism, then that is up to you - but the ideal that was concurrent throughout Europe was that the vast majority did not want war.

Both liberals, Conservatives of all hues stood together once that war was engaged.

You would have to then go and look at the Korean war - how was that an ideal of Europe?

IF,as we now have to, look at the idealism of the USA - it is an obvious conclusion to come to but why did the 2nd Iraq war start? I know that over 1 million people marched in the UK alone against that war and still the ramifications are being felt.

That war was started, proposed and executed predominately by the USA. Where is your idealism when you look at that war? Can the same be said for Afghanistan? There is a broad consensus with Afghanistan as it is UN mandated, as was Korea - yet a war for the rights of another land was not started nor wanted by Europeans - the idealism in Europe is one of not wanting to fight if you don't have to.

the European continent will gradually lose its "indigenous" people and its culture as well.

Roy, the European continent doesn't have a stagnant 'culture'. All you have to do is look at each individual nation and see how each culture has changed over 2000 years. The indigenous people of Europe are what, exactly? Europe was and still is a greater melting pot than the US. I can say that, in my case alone, I have traced my lineage back as far as I can and from that evidence my name/roots came over during the 1066 invasion.

Am I therefore indigenous British or French/Norman?

rng

at 12:06 on August 29th, 2009

the European continent will gradually lose its "indigenous" people and its culture as well.

The remark is only understandable in context. If you world view is racialist, you see each ethnic group as discrete and having certain characteristics, therefore a German is a German and a culture is static. The culture is then diluted bu immigration and becomes less than its former self. It is the same logic as the loonie who keeps posting on the other threads than homosexuality is less than heterosexuality as it precludes monogamist reproduction or some other such tripe. Such thinking assumes a paradigm and then any variant to the paradigm as a corruption. Such a concept is generally flawed, but especially so when it is applied to culture. Culture is never fixed, it is always evolving and is always a product of the ebb and flow of peoples, moral codes and accommodations. A culture is a living thing. It is just a error in logic to think a culture can be 'lost'

a211423

at 11:40 on August 29th, 2009

The earliest hominid to be discovered on European Continent--so far--is homo georgicus who lived approximately 1.8 million years ago in Georgia. So, I guess that means all of us who claim European heritage are really Eurasian and children of the steppes.