NP Rank:
Allah lovers release Polish beheading video
by Ahmar Mustikhan | February 8, 2009 at 11:24 pm
23170 views | 42 Recommendations | 41 comments

The Taliban in Pakistan have released a seven-minute video showing the beheading of Polish engineer Piotr Stanczak.
In the background was a big black banner that read, "There is no God but Allah; Muhammad is the prophet of Allah." Two Taliban terrorist, their faces covered in black hoods and holding kalashnikovs, are also seen in the video.
Some among the 60 in jail the killers wanted freed were involved in the beheading of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl on Feb. 1, 2002.
Crowd Power
First Flagged at 11:44 PM, Feb 8, 2009 by Sanjay Jha
These members have powered this story:-
Ahmar Mustikhan
Washington, District Of Columbia, United States
Recommendations (42)
-
israeli.agent
India -
RoryKearney
Voorhees, New Jersey, United States -
René
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States -
Sanjay Jha
New Delhi, India 
Anonymous users (13)
-
Fred Miller
Friendswood, Texas, United States -
Fripouille
Lyon, France -
harringtola
Town-send, Massachusetts, United States -
158
St. Louis, Missouri, United States -
Barry Artiste
Vancouver, Canada




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (41)
at 23:31 on February 8th, 2009
This is terrible and horrific. The world must act to dissolve Pakistan.
at 23:44 on February 8th, 2009
Good Post. This incident will further dent Pakistan's international image and bolster the fact that Pakistani government is not fighting with fundamentalist terrorists on its soil.
at 00:26 on February 9th, 2009
The video should be taken down. I do not think that we want to encourage beheading here nor give terrorist prime time on this site for that would just encourage more such videos to be made and meaning more victims. Some times censorship is appropriated and I am would suggest you do it your self.
at 01:22 on February 9th, 2009
The video does not show the execution -- it only bares the mindset of the killers.
at 06:06 on February 9th, 2009
You are not reporting as a CJ, but rather propagating hate and encouraging Defamation of a religion with your title and video. Wish I think is neither good CJ nor ethical.
at 13:05 on February 9th, 2009
If you don't mind me saying so Paschen, your comment would have been more credible if you had posted similar ones on some of the many, and you must have read them, outrageous titles and article content referring to Jews and Israel during the recent fighting. But you did not. Your silence on those posts was deafening.
If you are going to present yourself as being against "propagating hate and encouraging Defamation of a religion", you should put it into practice yourself and use the same standards for all.
Child-Killers, extermination, Nazis, genocide.....Isn't THAT hate?
Those posts are still there, all over the site. Why don't you go do the same there as you so promtly did here.
Ethics Sure! That cuts both ways.
Thanks.
at 15:52 on February 9th, 2009
I did post similar comments on a great many occasions over the Israeli-Gaza conflict, the Mumbay attack the Afghan Killing of Japanese NG worker, The Tamil Crisis and so on. Do you have any idea how many such post appear?
Using words out of context is dangerous Fripouille, What you mentioned here as example are words that have their place in proper context same has this title in another context and with another "tournure de Phrase" the words are fine then.
I do no read every post either Fripouille nor do you. And what you are doing here is defaming and insulting.
at 16:13 on February 9th, 2009
"And what you are doing here is defaming and insulting".
I am deeply disappointed to read that Paschen. If disagreeing with you politely, but firmly as was my intention, with no inference whatsoever that you were being anything else but one-sided in your point of view in my personal opinion, leads to your saying that my conduct is "defaming and insulting", then I suggest there's a big problem here.
Defamation of others and insulting them is not permitted here. If that's how you see it, then maybe you should signal my defamatory and insulting remarks....
I stand by my comments, which were in no way intended to do anything else but ask you to apply the same standards to yourself as you do to others. Don't you agree? Fine, say so, as you began to do, but the reaction contained in the last sentence of what you wrote is not something I shall let go unchallenged.
That comment does you no credit I'm afraid, in my humble opinion.
Well well.....
at 04:18 on February 9th, 2009
I have a problem with the title of the article. Even as an atheist I find the term "Allah lovers" offensive towards Muslims and otherwise trashy. I can't understand why it was promoted to the front page.
at 04:41 on February 9th, 2009
I agree with Ms. Negativity and Paschen.
at 05:00 on February 9th, 2009
I believe in citizens journalism we call a spade a spade........
at 05:16 on February 9th, 2009
You may call a spade a spade, however there is such a thing as morals and ethics to up hold.
at 14:37 on February 9th, 2009
Morals and ethics as conceived by an individual should be universally and evenly applied by that person Paschen. If not, they are not morals or ethics, but just a point of view.
Thanks.
at 19:58 on February 17th, 2009
Dear Fripouille: I am afraid I need to inform you that if Morals and Ethics were the same in every spot of this world, we would have less conflicts or at least easiest ways to solve them. Un/fortunately (depending on the point of view) they are not universal standards. Additionally human beings develop agreements, revise points of view and have discussed and modified limits through all history. Is a dynamic process and many examples can be mentioned for instance slavery is not accepted anymore, but remember it was perfectly correct once upon a time to "own" someone for you or your family.
at 05:14 on February 9th, 2009
What is written in the banner? Urdu or Arabic? And translation also please..
Agent.
at 05:28 on February 9th, 2009
I think calling the criminals Allah lovers is wrong. They are just criminals. I think no religion in the world has permitted the killing of innocent people. These people have committed a great crime therefore, they should be called as criminals not Allah lovers. Allah Almighty never allows the killing of innocent people. Polish engineer is the guest of Pakistan and killing of guest is being considered a coward act. These terrorists should be called as criminals not Allah lovers.
at 06:44 on February 9th, 2009
voiceforpeace "I think no religion in the world has permitted the killing of innocent people" would you like to reword that statement for it is not actually correct the world has seem many religions one or more permitted cutting out the heart of a young innocent maiden so it could be offered to the gods or a god. Also the great catholic religious movement has a very lucid past.
However I agree yes these criminal should not be termed servants of any God. But the problem is they shout very loud that they are doing the work of Allah this does not fool most sensible people we know exactly what these un-human people are.
at 06:05 on February 9th, 2009
They should be referred to as 'BASTARDS' !
at 06:36 on February 9th, 2009
This is mistake in the name of polish engineer . His name is Piotr Stańczak .
at 06:59 on February 9th, 2009
The taliban conflict inflict horrific abuses and the west is best left out of it, cause damned if you do, and damned if you don't interfere! Of course we in the west must abide by the rules of war, red cross and geneva convention, yet the Terrorists, Poo Poo this idea of rules of engagement and prisoners unless it happens to be them at stake, then the cowardly chicken shits spout abuse, abuse, please abide by the rules of war, red cross, geneva convention, then whiny little asses that they are plead for the world to stop their incarceration at Gitmo as inhuman as they slice into the human flesh of an innocent for their imaginary friend Allah! I say execute em on sight and save the taxpayers the bother of imprisoning them. Sure as shooting Canada may revisit this if it accepts terrorists from Gitmo.
at 07:17 on February 9th, 2009
I think the title might have read "Self Professed Allah Lovers" rather than implicating all Muslims. I really think the point is HATE, control and power and not love at all. Additionally, the Taliban, is sometimes promoted to be a legitimate group , non-terrorist, (as in Pakistan where they are trying to get resettled) and I think this is never the case. I think the entire basis for the Taliban is terrorism at it's core. The abuse of certain groups (specifically all women in this case) to enforce control through terror and is a basic terrorist tactic.
at 07:33 on February 9th, 2009
I agree with Harringtola.
The title is not appropriate. 99% of Muslims are not violent. That a minority who claim to be Muslims would do this should not incite hatred of all Muslims. This story is important and deserves to be told byt the culprits are Taliban, not all Muslims.
I have spoken out against labeling all Jews as child killers and I also oppose implying all who woorship Allah are terrorists.
at 07:44 on February 9th, 2009
I, too, find the title offensive. I am a Christian, but people who claim to be Christians have done many crimes against humanity. I would not like to see a headline over their deeds saying "Jesus Lovers." It would be unfair to make the behavior of a few representative of the entire religion. The same thing goes here, I believe.
Mary
at 12:35 on February 9th, 2009
Sorry to hear about this story, but the title should read something like "God lovers...." maybe "Taliban....." unless you meant to offend the whole Islamic world?
at 08:26 on February 9th, 2009
The Taliban are pushing their extreme and twisted views and trying to create fear within the public. Negative stories are always the big scoop, but in order for us to fight against this type of extremism we have to educate and report positive aspects of Islam. The more we know about the religion and its teachings the better off we are against such extreme ideas.
They're using the media as a tool and a lot of mainstream networks are giving them front and centre stage labelling The Taliban as Muslim Terrorists. The networks have to do a better job at distinguishing the difference between the two. They shouldn't even be called muslims because their extreme ideas don't even represent Islam.
at 11:45 on February 9th, 2009
I think the title is fine. If Christians were (still) doing this kind of crap, I would think that titling the story "Jesus Lovers" would be very fair. 99% of Muslims may (or may not) be non-violent, but atrocities are being committed in the name of that religion daily. What bothers me is that I don't hear any great outcry from so-called "non-violent" Muslims. By their silence, they endorse this terrorism. In the absence of an extremely vocal denouncement from all Muslim leaders, I don't see how you can argue that this isn't the type of thing Muslims go for. When that bishop denied the holocaust, the pope said "take it back or else." I don't hear that type of condemnation from Muslim leaders directed toward these animals.
at 11:57 on February 9th, 2009
Much like saying all black people are like OJ Simpson. Blame the criminal not the group.
Muslims do not have a Pope. There is no overall head of the Muslim religion. Each Muslim can choose which religious leader to follow.,
at 11:45 on February 9th, 2009
.. we will remember this murder and here is the message to Pakistan people: KEEP AWAY FROM MY COUNTRY (POLAND) AND ME. We will kill you as well as you kill our innocent man.
cheers
M.
at 12:41 on February 9th, 2009
Saying like this you equals to this murders
STOP VIOLENCE
STOP WAR
STOP TERRORISM
at 12:46 on February 9th, 2009
I too do not think the title of this post is appropriate.
I would not agree however that the video (which doesn't work lol!) should be taken down on the pretexts that it "encourages" beheading. After all, there are pictures on NP at this very moment showing terribly injured children in Gaza and a video showing a dying child purported to have been a victim of shelling in Gaza, but that does not mean that they were put up to encourage the killing of children.
Any video showing extreme violence should be labelled sensitive material, but not cut.
Thanks