An Update: AMA Apologizes for Racist History

by Karen Hatter | July 16, 2008 at 01:12 pm

1380 views | 68 Recommendations | 43 comments

press release issued by the American Medical Association (AMA), dated July 10, 2008, reads in part:  

.... In 2005, the AMA convened and supported an independent panel of experts to study the history of the racial divide in organized medicine, and the culmination of this work prompted the apology. Details of the panel's work will be made public on the Web site of the AMA's Institute for Ethics to coincide with publication in the July 16 Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).*  

The American Medical Association (AMA) was founded by physicians from the University of Pennsylvania in 1847and in that year, hosted a two day convention.  

The convention's two main points of focus: a code of ethics and standards for medical education and training. Black physicians were not allowed entry into the organization.  

In response to their exclusion, Black doctors formed the National Medical Association (NMA) in 1895, which the AMA refused to acknowledge.  

According to this article found at Medpagetoday.com:

Over the years, the AMA turned away many efforts by the NMA and others groups seeking closer ties. For example, in 1944, the AMA rejected a proposal that NMA members be allowed "associate membership" in the AMA.

Dr. Wynia and colleagues found the AMA failed to adopt 10 separate proposals from 1948 to 1965 to expand African-American membership.


It was not until the late 1960s that the AMA began applying anti-discrimination policies to its state affiliates.

The AMA did not require state level chapters to desegregate until 1968.  

The AMA apology, along with commentary, is to appear in a soon to be published edition of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

  An abstract from the article, available on line for purchase at the JAMA website, states:  

Like the nation as a whole, organized medicine in the United States carries a legacy of racial bias and segregation that should be understood and acknowledged. For more than 100 years, many state and local medical societies openly discriminated against black physicians, barring them from membership and from professional support and advancement. The American Medical Association was early and persistent in countenancing this racial segregation. Several key historical episodes demonstrate that many of the decisions and practices that established and maintained medical professional segregation were challenged by black and white physicians, both within and outside organized medicine. The effects of this history have been far reaching for the medical profession and, in particular, the legacy of segregation, bias, and exclusion continues to adversely affect African American physicians and the patients they serve.

According to an article at Baltimoresun.com, dated July 11:

Without membership in medical societies, black physicians were denied admitting privileges at hospitals, financial support such as loans to open practices, leases for office space and even medical malpractice insurance, said Dr. Matthew Wynia, director of the AMA's Institute of Ethics. Continuing education was also difficult because black doctors couldn't attend meetings to learn about new treatments and research.  

Click here for the original article.  

Update:  

From the Journal of the American Medical Association  (JAMA) paper titled, African Americans Physicians and Organized Medicine, 1846-1968: Origins of a Racial Divide, appearing in the issue dated July 16, 2008:  

Summary  

In the United States, organized medicine emerged from a society deeply divided over slavery, but largely accepting of systemic racial inequities and theories espousing black inferiority. Emblematic of existing societal values, and practices within the profession, medical schools, residency programs, hospital staffs and professional societies largely excluded African Americans. For more than 100 years, many medical associations, including the AMA, actively reinforced or passively accepted this exclusion. Still, throughout this history, vocal groups of physicians- black and white and within and outside these associations - challenged segregation and racism.

  From a report entitled, Report on Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care, released by the AMA:

Overview

Almost thirty years ago and over one hundred years after the end of the Civil War, our nation was confronting head-on the racial hatred that is all too evident in our history. The civil rights movement was in full blossom, blatant segregation was disappearing and many people were smug in the assumption that "we shall overcome." However, while our society did not appear to be agitated on the surface, the reality of persistent racial tension springing from our history of inequality was rolling to the point where actions were about to be taken that would demonstrate the intensity of the need for empowerment in the minority communities.

The summer of 1967 witnessed horrendous examples of racially based disorders in American cities, most notably in Detroit and Newark, and prompted President Johnson to appoint a special commission under the leadership of then Illinois Governor Otto Kerner. The Commission's 1968 report, Report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorder, examined the root causes of what The New York Times characterized as the "violent racial crisis in America today."

The disparity in meeting the health care needs of the non-white population was cited by the Commission as one factor underlying this racial crisis. ....

recommend Add a comment
jordan
  • super editor
jordan
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 13:14 on July 16th, 2008

Great find. (I also see that you stared down the formatting bug, and forced it to blink)

0
Karen Hatter

Thanks, Jordan. Yeah, I'm growing mighty weary of that bug!

julianw
julianw
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 14:01 on July 16th, 2008

Karen Hatter, thanks for this. I'd be interested to hear more when the apology appears in the JAMA.

0
Karen Hatter

You're welcome, Julian and thanks for the flag. I'd like to see that issue myself. 

amyjudd
  • super editor
amyjudd
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 14:20 on July 16th, 2008

Karen Hatter, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Wow, they should have been forced to apologize!

0
Karen Hatter

Thanks, Amy. I guess the question is who could have forced them to do so? 

0
amyjudd

Yes, I agree - good question indeed.

StandUpToRacism
StandUpToRacism
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 16:17 on July 16th, 2008

Karen Hatter, The AMA apologized... and I think The Republican Party... sort of... apologized... now if each person would look into their heart... and see if they need to apologize for any of their past behavior.

Will.

0
Karen Hatter

Thanks for the flag, StandUpToRacism. An apology lays the ground work for healing. An apology without reformative action is worthless.

politisite
politisite
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 17:59 on July 16th, 2008

Karen Hatter, I like this story. It's good stuff.  Bout time

0
Karen Hatter

Thank you, Al.

Rhonda J Mangus
Rhonda J Mangus
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 18:03 on July 16th, 2008

Karen Hatter, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
Karen Hatter

Thanks, Rhonda. 

Barry Artiste
Barry Artiste
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 19:43 on July 16th, 2008

Karen Hatter, I like this story. It's good stuff. You know Karen, it boggles the mind how an association of humanity, apparently did not even recognize female doctors let alone black doctors until the 20 century, for instance that Dr. Whats her name, Medicine woman tv series, yeah like that really happened in the 19 century. 

0
Karen Hatter

It was Dr. Quinn, Barry. Mind boggling? No, not if one acknowledges the contradictory nature of American society's development.

0
Barry Artiste

Thats it, Dr. Quinn, though I have never watched an episode, I have seen snippets time to time when looking for the Simpsons.  Now who said I was an intellectual?

0
CJaye

Being a Nurse I feel Apologizes are nice and a article in the JAMA is great as well.  What about the National Medical Association (NMA)?  The Association was formed, it's not 1847 anymore.  Why haven't any of the black physicians pushed to have this reinstated?  This is something to very proud of.  I would want to be associated to the NMA if it were available.  We didn't learn that in school thank you for advising.

0
Karen Hatter

Hi CJaye. I am not a member of the National Medical Association (NMA) so therefore, I cannot speak for them. But, I'm sure it's safe to speculate that they have pushed for inclusion, seeking acknowledgement from their fellow physicians in the American Medical Association (AMA).

The need for and functioning of the separate organization for Black physicians arose out of exclusion from the organization that accepted only White doctors, not a desire for Black physicians to have their own association.

As written here, after the formation of the National Medical Association (NMA), the American Medical Association (AMA) didn't recognize those having membership in the NMA as colleagues. 

As I stated in the above intro for the linked article, the American Medical Association (AMA) did not require local chapters to desegrate until 1968, four years after the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Depending upon how Black physicians view efforts by the AMA to address issues of major concern to the NMA, this may be the first step toward merging the two organizations. This is purely a guess on my part.  

 

 

duo
duo
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 04:36 on July 17th, 2008

Karen Hatter, I like this story. It's good stuff.  When I read the original article, I hope I will find that the AMA apologized not only because of discrimination toward black doctors, but also practicing discrimination against black patients, such as making blacks test subjects. The AMA apologizing was a good gesture that is long overdue.  Looks like some rifts are healing.  When prejudice is completely eradicated, America will accomplish even greater things than we already have!

Mary Neal

0
Karen Hatter

Thank you, Mary. I have not read the AMA's actual apology yet but, several articles I have read state that there isn't a head on acknowledgement of lower standard of care and services to the Black community but, it is sort of hinted at in the articles.

The use of Black test subjects and the mentally disabled, disadvantaged and poor, is another issue to be addressed as well.

My sense was the apology attempts to acknowledge placing Black physicians in an undesirable set of circumstances, in many ways hampering and making difficult their ability to practice medicine and heal the sick within the Black community, which, of course, translates into some form of difficulty for the Black patients themselves.  

0
duo

Well, in that case, it would certainly be a very weak and half-hearted apology.  Sort of like the terrorists who destroyed the Twin Towers issuing an apology for stealing our planes.

Mary

0
Karen Hatter

Good one! However, after studying information from various sources over a three year period, that's why the apology was drafted. The AMA has also created, in conjunction with the NMA, an organization meant to address health disparities. Undoing and re-crafting so many issues and elements needing to be addressed, with a more than one hundred year legacy that has created real feelings, among many, of exclusion, isolation and mistrust, couldn't and won't happen overnight.      

Caoimhin1
Caoimhin1
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 05:00 on July 17th, 2008

Karen Hatter, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
Karen Hatter

Thank you, Cao.

0
AlvarezGalloso

I like this story also.

0
Karen Hatter

Thank you, AlvarezGalloso.

ifindtrends
  • editor
ifindtrends
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 14:29 on July 17th, 2008

Karen Hatter, I like this story. It's good stuff.

I think everything has been said. Always a good read from your stuff.

"We are all one race, The human Race"

0
Karen Hatter

Thank you, Ifindtrends. Good to hear from you!

0
Barry Artiste

Wel save for those Smug Belgians, ooooooooh how I hate their smarmy know it all ways.

0
CJaye

FYI

National Association of Doctors

American Association of Physicians and Surgeons,INC

World Medical Association

Arab Doctors Association

Chinese Medical Association

American Association of Physicians of Indian Orgin

Why can't everybody be under one Association?  This makes my head spin.  Good Lord I had no idea there were so many. This is just some of them, there are more.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

July 16, 2008 at 01:12 pm by Karen Hatter, 1380 views, 43 comments

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from