America is overpopulated: who is talking?

by YankeeJim | April 30, 2012 at 05:46 am
832 views | 5 Recommendations | 6 comments

Photos

Presidential candidate families

Presidential candidate families

see larger image

uploaded by YankeeJim

I wrote an article for the Examiner.com observing that none of the Presidential candidates are addressing America’s overpopulation problem. I wonder if anyone in the NowPublic audience has a concern about this. Here is my story.


“Family planning or left to chance

James George

Politics Examiner

What is the optimal size for the American family?

Let’s see the presidential candidates’ answers by outcomes.

Obama – two children

Romney – five children

Gallup asks Americans nearly every year what they think the ideal number of children is for a family to have. The answer in 2011 was averaged at 2.5 children. Let’s consider the distribution:

53% of the respondents said “two” children, 33% said three or more; 5% said none or 1 leaving 9% “no opinion.” The mode answer is to replenish and not exceed replacing the parents.

http://www.gallup.com/...8/children-violence.aspx

The U.S. population as of June 2011 is 311,591,917.  Therefore, if we exercise our “planned” behavior, Americans will add 15,595,958.5 new people to the economy through additional births.

How many additional people do we plan to add by immigration?

What is the optimum size for America? Answering this question approaches the subject of “overpopulation.”

“What is overpopulation?

Overpopulation occurs when an area is populated too heavily for the available resources and the capacity of the environment. When an area is overpopulated, its population cannot be maintained without destroying nonrenewable resources and without affecting the carrying capacity of the environment (the earth’s ability to support current and future inhabitants).

Is overpopulation a problem in the United States?

The U.S. is the only major industrialized country still growing, and we show no signs of stopping. The Census shows we grew by 10 percent between 2000 & 2010--and by 68 percent the last 50 years! You can see evidence of the problem all around you--vanishing open spaces, water and energy shortages, soil erosion, and air pollution, as well as overcrowded schools, urban sprawl, and traffic congestion.

At 311 million Americans, we’re already well over our carrying capacity, and Census projections say we could grow to over 400 million by 2050–that’s another 100 million people to feed, clothe, educate, and house.”

http://www.npg.org/faq.html

I don’t hear presidential candidates addressing this problem, though the economic symptoms abound indicating that we are outstripping our resources.”


http://www.examiner.com/article/family-planning-or-left-to-chance

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
3
YankeeJim

How many kids does 30-06 have?


5
"thirty-aught-six"

Enough! Like all other social criteria this too should be controlled by government. After all -think of all those people who haven't had children and all those unfortunate children with out parents. The government should make them adopt until these people become part of the norm. The herd is scattered all over the map and that is not good husbandry. Another Obama and progressive America failure. Parenting needs to be regulated and laws established so no child is with out family. Regulation would also get rid of the bad parents because all parents would be closely monitored by the federal government under a child welfare police act. Then once we have every child with in a family structure we could begin mandatory tubal ligation for both men and women who are not selected by the State to reproduce according to the State's careful eye on DNA quality control and future employment needs not met by illegal immigration. Of course none of this would apply to Black's, Hispanic's, Asians, or any other cultural minority. We don't want to be racist about it or fail in our endeavor to be politically correct.

4
YankeeJim

I am looking for every familiy to give up .5 children.

4
"thirty-aught-six"

We'll have to convene a board of progressive government union employed parents first who could determine by all the rules of political correctness and the social angst of the day which .5 children of every family is the greatest victim and thus excluded from any post birth abortion rights. It couldn't be a standards-based reform because like NCLB that wouldn't be fair for the children. Perhaps a lottery. You know you won when little johnny or Mary doesn't come home one day and instead you get a lovely letter describing how your financial burden has been reduced by the State for the benefit of the state.... and the environment.

3
YankeeJim

Pretty soon everyone will have a Romney cousin.

4
someguy

China has had it's "one child per couple" population control program in place since 1978. Personally, I would prefer an "in your face" population control program in American rather than a covert infertility program (some reports have indicated this program may have already been implemented). Although where I live, the population has been steadily declining for at least the past twenty years. Must be an anomaly in the statistics.

 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from