America’s Oligarchy

by YankeeJim | November 8, 2010 at 03:42 am
409 views | 4 Recommendations | 18 comments

Photos

Powerful | Photo 02

Powerful | Photo 02

see larger image

uploaded by YankeeJim

There is a notion believed by some inside and outside the US that America is “controlled” by oligarchs. I personally have witnessed powerful people who affect American policy such that they and their families benefit personally, in fact, we all have.

The Bush family is surely part of the oligarchy, then who else? If you take any oligarchy family, such as the Bushes, trace their friends and business associates, and you will find them “controlling” large and influential defense contractors and energy interests as well as other strategic materials.

Included in the oligarchy are people like Michael Bloomberg, mayor of New York, with vast interest in news media.

The easiest place to discover the American oligarchy is in the Forbes list of the wealthiest Americans as well as examining the CEOs and board members of the Fortune 500.

CAP-COM

The Economics of Balance
- Capitalism And Communalism
In The Enfranchised Society -

by
Kent Welton

1. ENCLOSURE & NATURAL FREEDOM -

"The lands of Italy, which had been originally divided among the families of free and indigent proprietors, were purchased or usurped by the avarice of the nobles; and in the age which proceeded the fall of the republic, it was computed only two thousand citizens were possessed of any independent substance."

Edward Gibbon,
Decline And Fall Of the Roman Empire

Historic freedom arose from possession of an estate of arable land, whether owned individually or in common, and from which Freemen could come and go from their marketplaces. Within an estate of natural freedom - wherein no person, party, or "factor" (capital or labor) was under duress, and where each was capable of withholding their contribution - real justice, equity, and democracy could arise and prevail. In these free meetings of landed independents truly free markets could arise to benefit all, and exploit none.

In contrast, when either primary factor to the economic equation is less free, landless, burdened by debt, overtaxation, or simply desperate for money-wages to survive then markets are no longer truly free... for all. As a result of the relative lack of freedom of one factor or another we create problematic, factor-imbalanced, markets if not altogether unfree, dysfunctional, and costly markets.

In effect, factor-imbalanced markets give rise to all manner of societal and market distortions, exploitations, deprivations, and revenge-driven cataclysms. With a lack of landed freedom giving rise to dependency, disenfranchisement and factor-imbalanced markets, history thus became one long tale of the traumas and turmoil arising from the resultant fascisms of Left and Right.

Other imperialisms aside, enclosures of land by the ruling classes in England once steadily reduced the number of landed Freemen and greatly increased the number of indebted, urban, wage-bound dwellers who no longer retained their freedom estate or Commons upon the land. Endless rent, mortgage, debt, and wage came to replace natural freedom and a commonwealth in the "free market." Over time, these moves to the city and wage-work translated into lost natural refuge upon the land.

Regardless of reasons, other benefits, or our urban proclivities, enclosures meant then, and mean today, dependency, disenfranchisement, lack of refuge from the market, and a rent and debt-driven desperation for the many. Rather than landed, enfranchised, villagers coming to a free market (or refraining if desired) modern "free markets" are filled with landless, dependent, and wage-bound souls. In relation to the capital they must serve to earn a living, they are increasingly impotent in the marketplace, and so the implications for both society and markets are profound.

This veritable sea-change in the estate of wage-earning majorities is now the ground, the socio-economic set and setting, upon which modern markets engender inequities, misallocations, and endless social and political turmoil. It is for these historic and structural reasons that factor balance and effective democracy must be re-created and preserved throughout our institutions.”

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
3
YankeeJim

When Congress and the Supreme Court treat corporations as citizens, the oligarchy is empowered.

The process is for corporate wealthy to buy politicians, manipulate voters, and control the country at voters' expense. It seems to be working for them.

0
YankeeJim

By the way, it is still a mens club.

1
utilaeastwind

This process happens over and over again. When the Soviet Union dissolved, it was only months until these same "noble" Communist Party and KGB members were able to starve factory workers until they signed their shares, of said factory, over to the current Russian Oligarchy.

In Venezuela, they are 70 years behind. There the State is consolidating power and annexing European and American Corporation holdings. In this case, The Communists are near consolidating control and Venezuela may slip into the Dark Ages for many generations to come. Becoming nothing more than a garrisoned country, ruled by priestly members of the Socialist Party.

The USA has a system that is on the edge of Fascism. When you consider the control that Corporations have through campaign donations, Lobbyists and the Media, one can see that American needs some major fine tuning before any thinking person would consider it a true democracy.

If Americans are able to reign in the current Corporate Dominance in politics by limiting Corporate donations to $1000.00 and criminalizing the Corporate Lobby, the people could then truly be proud of their democracy and enjoy the protection of their Constitution.

As the world is and you look at all the alternative political structures, Chinese Democracy, Islamic Fundamentalism or the Russian Mafia, the American System could be still considered the one of the least undemocratic power-nations on earth.

Put it this way, if my country was going to be liberated, I would rather it be by the USA than ransacked by a band of Bolshevistic zombies, who's Generals send into battle to complete one mission only, and that is to die.


0
YankeeJim

Democracy has slipped from the grasp of the American voter with defective legislation and the court supporting it.

0
YankeeJim

"Fascism (pronounced /ˈfæʃɪzəm/) is a radical and authoritarian nationalist political ideology.[1][2][3][4] Fascists seek to organize a nation according to corporatist perspectives, values, and systems, including the political system and the economy."
That describes the USA. Anyone want to debate that?

2
"thirty-aught-six"

You left out the Kennedy's, the Gore's, and the Clinton's.

0
YankeeJim

This list goes on. Your point is well taken. No party has a corner on oligarchy. The thing that makes America's different perhaps, is the owners of big businesses can swing either way, depending upon the affinity of the politicians.

By the way, my thinking is that a whole lot Tea Party people would be worried to death when the court upheld defective legislation that made corporations equals to voters, and approved their donations cart blanche.

1
"thirty-aught-six"

I don't know. I don't think the law makers had much choice once they declared to treat corporations as individuals period. It isn't just political donations. It sets a precedence for white collar crime. That the corporation is more important then the individual in terms of punitive measures.  Personally, I dislike the direction. It obfuscates the principles of individual rights and freedoms. Individual ought to be singular person by definition and not confused by any adaptation to singular enterprise, which is a collective. For the lawyers, when they can't prosecute or loose in court against individual white collar crimes, they will now work to hold the corporation responsible.  A lot more money is going to be invested in lawyering than in growth or will at least greatly impact on potential growth. Either way the future of business is going to get a lot more conservative in execution and management. One more risk, and a definite unknown,  has been added to the business/corporate equation. 

0
YankeeJim

I am with you. Vigilance and attention needed.

1
t k kidwai

Every so-called democratic country is run by oligarchs.Our oligarch controlled media keeps us reminding that we are a democratic country,the only system of government which empowers every male and female citizen who has attained the voting age.

End of cold war in the aftermath of collapse of Soviet Union,rise of crony capitalism with the help of two notorious financial institutions,IMF and WB,in many so-called democratic countries various political parties merged into one with different names,symbols and election manifestos.In U.S.the Democrats represented labour and lower middle class,ethnic minorities and source of funding for compaign was contribution from trade unions and workers.Gradually,trade unions were systemitically weakened and new sources of funding had to be located.Oligarchs were there to provide money,subject to adavancement of their agenda-tax cuts for the richest,curtailment of workers' right,less spending on social sector like health and education,allocation of more funds for defence and national security.The last two,defence meant defence of their interests,that was capturing more and more markets for raw material and cheap labour;national security meant security of their oveseas investments.

How Democrats could afford to be different from the Republicans.If Regan played in the hands of the American oligarchs,well represented by Wall Street,Clinton,too,did the same,and Obama is doing the same.He promised changes,and proved what some one had said that"Things have to change in order to remain same".

Oiligarchs are same,Presidents are same.But people are not same.They are jobless,homeless,have lost all hopes,feel more insecured than ever before.But their faith in the power of their vote blinds them to harsh realities.A vote for Democrat is a vote for oligarchcy;a vote for Republican is a vote for oligarchy.Wall street is all poweful institution of the American oligarchy.

0
YankeeJim

And...?

Join the NRA?

1
utilaeastwind

Join the Tea Party?

For now the Republicans have been able to reel in Tea Party supporters and even supported Tea Party Candidates on a Republican ticket.

However, the Tea Party Congress members may be much more than the Republicans can handle. The Republicans may find that they are not the majority in Congress, but a more a conservative coalition.

I believe that we could see the Tea Party reveal itself as more of a Revolutionary Party and as it's name implies, encourage tax revolt.

"Taxation without representation is tyranny". Through Corporate domination in the electoral process and through Corporate control of the media the idea of equal representation could become a weak argument, one the Tea Party will surely attack.

   

0
YankeeJim

I am barely a hanger on and surely not a joiner.

1
master_jim2008

You didn't mention the Bilderberg group or the tri-lateralists or the council on foreign relations.

watch The Obama Deception and it'll explain it all


0
YankeeJim

Hey, I am with you.

1
NewWorldOrder

Masonic Government, 'Total Social Control'

www.scribd.com/doc/8717201/Freemasonry-Our-Masonic-Government-and-Their-Hidden-Agenda

1
t k kidwai

@ Master-Jim 2008 ,you are right.Oligarchs and oligarchy are incomplete without mentioning Bilderberg group,Council on Foreign Relations,WB,IMF and UNO, one and same with different faces and names.The hidden agenda of one world government was begotten by Illuminati and carried forward to Freemasonry after crackdown on Illuminati in Austria and now being persued vigorously by these associations and institutions.

But implementation of that sisnister agenda of one government is practically impossible,as one religion,one language and one culture are not possible.Concenteration of wealth in fewer and fewer hands is serving the purpose of oligarchs,they have control over our minds,natural resources and whosoever is elected is of as little consequences as are puppets and pawns.

0
YankeeJim

"Concenteration of wealth in fewer and fewer hands is serving the purpose of oligarchs"
That is the primary purpose.
What is the limit: One lifetime.
A corporate life can be forever, and then their is inheritance.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

utilaeastwind
First Flagged at 8:13 AM, Nov 8, 2010 by utilaeastwind
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (4)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from